If and I mean IF Boise is somehow invited... please make removal of the smurf turf a requirement.
AT LEAST the MWC forbid the blue jersey on blue field.
If and I mean IF Boise is somehow invited... please make removal of the smurf turf a requirement.
I really hope the big xii.isn't too worried about the BE and not wanting to "poach" their teams. They'll find replacements, and anymore its eat or be eaten in college athletics. Basically them our us.
I think the bigger issue with bowl games is that most of the B12 bowls are in Texas. It would be nice to get some variety.
BYU beatable yup
AF beatable yup
Boise beatable nope
No but some more exposure in Florida would be nice too.Additional exposure in Texas is a bad thing?
For what it's worth....
Insiders in BYU chat are saying that the new teams will be BYU, Air Force and Boise... B12 doesn't want to kill off the BE.
It basically died with the Pitt and Syracuse departures.
Adding BYU, AFA, and Boise would be a sign of pure desperation on the B12's part. AFA cannot consistently compete in the B12 with their academic and service requirements and Boise FB will quickly tank with the B12's academic requirements.
What decided advantage does ISU have over BSU right now? I would argue none. Contrary to popular belief, BSU doesn't accept partial qualifiers anymore. Beyond that, who cares about academics in the Big 12?
What decided advantage does ISU have over BSU right now? I would argue none. Contrary to popular belief, BSU doesn't accept partial qualifiers anymore. Beyond that, who cares about academics in the Big 12?
What decided advantage does ISU have over BSU right now? I would argue none. Contrary to popular belief, BSU doesn't accept partial qualifiers anymore. Beyond that, who cares about academics in the Big 12?
Uh, they may not now, this year, but they have until they joined the new conference. Boise has won a ton of games on the backs of partial qualifiers, just like Fresno State.
Arguing otherwise is foolish. They will suffer in a league that doesn't allow them, just like Nebraska did.
The presidents at UT, KU, Mizzou and ISU especially care about academics as does Boren at OU who desperately wanted P12 membership to raise OU's academic profile. Do you really think the UT Prez and some of the other Prezs are going to approve adding a Mickey Mouse academic school like Boise? I would be shocked if they do.
Boise doesn't have the in-state recruiting base to sustain their success once Chris Peterson leaves. It would be a monumental mistake for the B12 to add Boise assuming UT and OU are staying put.
What decided advantage does ISU have over BSU right now? I would argue none. Contrary to popular belief, BSU doesn't accept partial qualifiers anymore. Beyond that, who cares about academics in the Big 12?
Big XII was, prior to the instability. If Missery stays, I think there's still 5 of the 9 AAU.Then why are we not pushing TTU, OKS and KSU to further academics. We are not an academic conference. The Big Ten, Pac 10 and ACC may be, but we are not.
Big XII was, prior to the instability. If Missery stays, I think there's still 5 of the 9 AAU.
They built a lot of their past success on that. They, like TCU, are a team that's been the flavor of the decade, but who knows if that continues if they're playing the big boys more than a couple of times per year. I don't think they bring much in the way of TV sets, no on academics, limited on sports beyond football and wrestling. Stadium is small and that d*** blue field.
I'm going to side with the others when I say to go east, Big East that is. Less flash, more balanced athletic departments.
I don't believe so. There is no such thing as partial qualifiers in Division 1 as I understand it and I don't think BSU has taken them since they went D1 in 1996. You can petition, I believe for someone to be admitted but that person is ineligible for a year and he must validate qualification, similar to Rony Nelson. I don't know if that was Rony's deal, but it would be a similar circumstance.
Let's say they do, again, what is the decided advantage ISU has?
I'm not for BSU to join. Their endowment is outrageously small but they are abig name and if they could sustain I don't see them being any different than ISU if they were to sustain success. People don't seem to take into account the boost they would get from being a BCS school either. That would help them a lot.