My Wishlist
Duke
Kansas
Washington
Auburn
Louisville
Syracuse
Arizona
UCLA
OSU
Cincinnati
Missouri
UNLV
Duke
Kansas
Washington
Auburn
Louisville
Syracuse
Arizona
UCLA
OSU
Cincinnati
Missouri
UNLV
What schools would you like to see the FBI
- Thread starter Knownothing
- Start date
Kansas Starters
Kansas Reserves
Kansas Red shirts
Kansas Walk ons
Kansas Cheer leaders
Kansas Managers
Bill Self
Bill self's Dog
Kansas Reserves
Kansas Red shirts
Kansas Walk ons
Kansas Cheer leaders
Kansas Managers
Bill Self
Bill self's Dog
I think he was doing stuff against NCAA rules, I'm not sure he reached into FBI probe territory. Oztelberger too. I suppose we'll find out.
Haven't seen LSU mentioned. They've landed some suspiciously good recruits despite sucking year after year. Also Washingon and Missouri.
Duke needs to go down. I think UNC are the good guys to be honest.
UNLV
Kentucky
UCLA - Lonzo Ball puts one more knife in the back of Steve Alford
Kentucky
UCLA - Lonzo Ball puts one more knife in the back of Steve Alford
I think it's a given that Kentucky and Calipari will be on this list, the guy has been caught cheating multiple times already and with all the 1 and done high profile recruits he still gets it would be a HUGE shock if he was actually clean this time. I've always felt Roy Williams has skeletons in his closet that he has been very good at hiding and maybe this time they finally get exposed. Scott Drew at Baylor would be no shock as quick as he turned that around and sustained it after the big scandal there. Pretty much would not be shocked if any blue blood school winds up on the report, it's hard to sustain that kind of high level of success where you can lose a ton of talent to the NBA on a given year and be able to reload with a bunch of 5 start recruits and barely miss a beat. Steve Alford and UCLA wouldn't surprise me considering his history of lack of morals plus he got commits from all 3 Ball kids at one time before that mess blew up on him and we all know how much their father LaVar likes to chase the dollar.
You just hope that we are in the clear, we did get dinged on some compliance issues back in the Hoiberg days with some recruiting contacts made that did not fall in compliance that we self-imposed some sanctions over but as far as we can tell I think the Prohm staff does a good job of identifying talent early and establishing those relationships before other big schools get involved. This year's freshmen are a prime examples, we were one of the first to be in on Wigginton before he started to rise in the recruit rankings and he stuck with his commitment. Lard had a lot of interest from some power 5 schools but he didn't get a lot of offers because of the questions around his eligibility which we benefited from sticking with him while that played out. We were in early on Horton-Tucker for next year too before he started climbing the rankings too.
College athletics in general has just become such a dirty environment. So much money involved in fielding competitive teams that it's not surprising that those involved will bend the rules to gain an advantage.
You just hope that we are in the clear, we did get dinged on some compliance issues back in the Hoiberg days with some recruiting contacts made that did not fall in compliance that we self-imposed some sanctions over but as far as we can tell I think the Prohm staff does a good job of identifying talent early and establishing those relationships before other big schools get involved. This year's freshmen are a prime examples, we were one of the first to be in on Wigginton before he started to rise in the recruit rankings and he stuck with his commitment. Lard had a lot of interest from some power 5 schools but he didn't get a lot of offers because of the questions around his eligibility which we benefited from sticking with him while that played out. We were in early on Horton-Tucker for next year too before he started climbing the rankings too.
College athletics in general has just become such a dirty environment. So much money involved in fielding competitive teams that it's not surprising that those involved will bend the rules to gain an advantage.
I probably should read up on it more, but how does the FBI actually 'prove' some of this? For example, let's say a booster and/or some school is giving lots of gear and financial support to an AAU league in which recruits play. Doesn't mean that's why the recruit chose that school later on.
Yeah - But when federal $ are involved Unc may be in more trouble as an institution than some of the others
Kentucky, ucla, Iowa, North Carolina, duke, unlv, Texas, florida, misery, Arizona, Louisville, syracuse, uconn, Arizona State , florida State, Ohio State, and the ones I missed. That's just my shortlist, lol.
Oh yeah kansas twice. One for crybaby roy and one for self!
Last edited:
UNC - University of No Classes
So appropiate that they won it all last year
Kansas is cheating. It’s been proven that Adidas was paying players to go to their top schools. And Self’s weird response in September sure sounded like he thought KU was in trouble
Colin Sexton was involved with schools busted by the. FBI, includng mighty Oklahoma State. How did he get cleared to play?
So appropiate that they won it all last year
Kansas is cheating. It’s been proven that Adidas was paying players to go to their top schools. And Self’s weird response in September sure sounded like he thought KU was in trouble
Colin Sexton was involved with schools busted by the. FBI, includng mighty Oklahoma State. How did he get cleared to play?
