Larson has the most upside, with lots of time to grow. If he's really 6'4" he could be a heavy. We could use a stopper at heavy.
Larson is nowhere close to 6'4". Would be surprised if he's over 6'1".
Larson has the most upside, with lots of time to grow. If he's really 6'4" he could be a heavy. We could use a stopper at heavy.
Larson is nowhere close to 6'4". Would be surprised if he's over 6'1".
I'll admit that I don't spend any time in the room, but I understand Weatherman passed that threshold a long time ago. That said, Tanner could go '84. He's got the frame for it.