MLB: Why is David Ortiz Sucking?

Why is David Ortiz Sucking

  • Lied About His Age

    Votes: 6 7.3%
  • Steroids/HGH

    Votes: 25 30.5%
  • Combination of 1 and 2

    Votes: 23 28.0%
  • Natural Decline

    Votes: 28 34.1%

  • Total voters
    82
  • Poll closed .

thatguy

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2009
4,384
1,205
113
42
DENVER
His articles suck for me because it's all-things-Boston. A really talented writer would be able to move away from that. Either that or brand him as a Boston writer.

i went back and re-read my post and it came out wrong. Everyone in the league would rather throw to Ortiz than Manny. My fault.

Sorry last night was sapposed to be one beer, and it turned into three pitchers and five starry nights.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

CrossCyed

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
10,875
2,342
113
sh*t i went back and re-read my post and it came out wrong. Everyone in the league would rather throw to Ortiz than Manny. My fault.

Sorry last night was sapposed to be one beer, and it turned into three pitchers and five starry nights.

Ha I was gonna say I was a little confused.
 

thatguy

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2009
4,384
1,205
113
42
DENVER
Ya Manny always hit before Ortiz and after Ortiz. Ortiz has always been OK before Manny and has struggled horribly after Manny.
 

Cyclonestate78

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2008
12,115
646
113
I agree. Someone who consistently hits around .260-.270 with a lot of power versus someone who consistently hits around .300 who also has a lot of power (but is potentially less powerful than the first guy) - I'd take my chances with the first guy.

He may be the best right handed hitter ever but he was an enormous liability in the field. Manny had an arm like jello and struggled to catch even simple fly balls. As a Red Sox fan I am soooooooooooooooooooooooooo glad that sack of **** is not in Boston anymore.
 

CylentButDeadly

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2009
3,286
266
83
Windsor Heights, IA
33 in baseball years isn't that old. Especially for a guy that DH's a lot. Steroids end of story

What we saw in the "Juiced" era though is that player's primes were extended into their mid-to-late 30s. With the presumed absence of PEDs (and I know that's a pretty bold thing to say), we might revert back to the 80s and the era of "deadball". With that as well, players skills might really start to decline once they hit 32-35. It happened that way in baseball for 80 years, there's no reason to think that a trend as evident as human aging won't be reestablished.

And yes, I realize nutrition and trainging have improved.
 

HiltonMagic

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
6,163
211
63
CA
Visit site
Bill Simmons actually wrote a Boston column? Wow!

He's should not be a featured writer in ESPN until they signify his column is Boston-exclusive. The man sucks.

Let's see, his last 10 columns:

Retro diary of NBA Finals Game 2 - Not Boston
NBA Finals Mailbag - Not Boston
Ortiz column - Boston
Column on officials in the NBA Playoffs - Not Boston
2-part Mailbag - Not Boston
3-part discussion with Malcolm Gladwell - Not Boston
NHL column - Not Boston
Manny column - Boston (but was definitely more than just a Boston story)
Retro diary of Rockets-Lakers Game 1 - Not Boston
Column on player interaction - Not Boston

So he wrote about Boston about 15% of the time. Yup, sure sounds like he's a 'Boston-exclusive' writer to me. :confused:
 

MidwestZest

Well-Known Member
Apr 22, 2006
2,023
101
63
Sycamore, IL
Its hard to believe that it could be steroids? What planet have you been living on?
1. See the rest of that post. I say why. Maybe I should have said "exclusively" steroids. It sure as hell COULD be contributing.
2. Holy Crap I knew there was a reason you were on my ignore list. Stupid "view post" button.....
 

thatguy

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2009
4,384
1,205
113
42
DENVER
He may be the best right handed hitter ever but he was an enormous liability in the field. Manny had an arm like jello and struggled to catch even simple fly balls. As a Red Sox fan I am soooooooooooooooooooooooooo glad that sack of **** is not in Boston anymore.

You're only saying that because he is gone. Nobody was saying, "We can't have Manny in left" when Boston was winning World Series. and if I have a pie thrower in left so be it, if that pie thrower hits .320/25/115
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,634
23,892
113
Macomb, MI
He may be the best right handed hitter ever but he was an enormous liability in the field. Manny had an arm like jello and struggled to catch even simple fly balls. As a Red Sox fan I am soooooooooooooooooooooooooo glad that sack of **** is not in Boston anymore.

Thus, being a fan of both the Twins and the Mets, why I have never said I wanted him to play for either team. While he swings a pretty good bat, there's a lot of baggage that comes with it - for starters, the poor defense that you mentioned as well as a mouth that duct tape couldn't keep shut and an attitude I wouldn't necessarily want in my clubhouse.

You're only saying that because he is gone. Nobody was saying, "We can't have Manny in left" when Boston was winning World Series. and if I have a pie thrower in left so be it, if that pie thrower hits .320/25/115

Even when the Red Sox were tearing it up with Manny I wasn't secretly pining for the Twins to trade half of their farm system to acquire him...
 

RayShimley

Well-Known Member
Sep 9, 2008
6,299
344
83
42
White Bear Lake, MN
He may be the best right handed hitter ever but he was an enormous liability in the field. Manny had an arm like jello and struggled to catch even simple fly balls. As a Red Sox fan I am soooooooooooooooooooooooooo glad that sack of **** is not in Boston anymore.

I wouldn't go that far. He played a pretty big part in the 2004/2007 WS titles. I won't argue that he had to go last year though, I was willing to put up with it up to that point. When the clubhouse turned on him, I knew it was over.
 

Chainsaw

New Member
May 28, 2009
9
4
3
I've watched power hitters decline in the mid thirties all my life, that is, until Steroids and Barry Bonds came along. I don't assume this is due to steroids or that he ever used them.
 

shagcarpetjesus

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
5,684
3,214
113
There's really no way to know at this point whether Papi's decline is PED-related. But I think perhaps the biggest factor is his body type. As a general rule: big, plodding, unathletic sluggers don't tend to age well. Just look at Travis Hafner. Guys like Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, Barry Bonds, Carlos Beltran are the ones who stick around forever and have productive careers, even if they put on weight as they get older. It's pretty clear that Bonds had "additional help" as he aged, but it doesn't change the fact that in general really athletic, all-around players tend to be the ones who age well.
 

CrossCyed

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
10,875
2,342
113
And one of the biggest chokers :)

That said, I think Pujols is probably better.

Frank Thomas still hasn't been connected to steroids in any way. He did it naturally. The book isn't written on Pujols yet, either, although he's been connected through some hearsay.
 

HiltonMagic

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
6,163
211
63
CA
Visit site
Frank Thomas still hasn't been connected to steroids in any way. He did it naturally. The book isn't written on Pujols yet, either, although he's been connected through some hearsay.

Didn't you know, Pujols is a machine?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ml0O-wPwsVU]YouTube - Pujols SportsCenter Commercial[/ame]
 

mplscyclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2008
3,268
135
63
41
Ames, IA
Regarding Manny's defense: I don't think most of you realize how little effect outfield defense has on wins and losses. Yes it was bad, but what he does at the plate makes up (and then some) for the poor defense.
 

mplscyclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2008
3,268
135
63
41
Ames, IA
Frank Thomas still hasn't been connected to steroids in any way. He did it naturally. The book isn't written on Pujols yet, either, although he's been connected through some hearsay.

So if someone did steroids they cannot be the greatest hitter of our generation then?
 

isucyfan

Speechless
Apr 21, 2006
21,371
5,642
113
52
Saint Paul, MN
Regarding Manny's defense: I don't think most of you realize how little effect outfield defense has on wins and losses. Yes it was bad, but what he does at the plate makes up (and then some) for the poor defense.

I would kind of disagree with that. Especially after seeing my Mets lose 2 of the first 5 games of the season due to their new left fielder, who is inept in the field. Over the course of a season, I would guess that the outfield can cost teams 5-10 games. Many times, in close games, missing the cutoff man or a fielding error loses a game. They do in the infield, too, but errors in the outfield are magnified, as they are less common.

You do hope that bad fielders are a net positive when factoring in their hitting, though. And I agree that Manny is a huge net gain, despite his outfield adventures.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron