Why is everyone blaming Richardson?

RealisticCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2014
1,696
2,720
113
Ames, IA
One player should not be getting blamed for the widespread dysfunction throughout the program, and I don’t think most people blame Sam for the loss. The interception at the end was the most glaring and obvious candidate for people to jump on, because it was in crunch time, and because it was quite possibly the worst decision I have ever seen an experienced QB make. He stared him down for 3 full seconds, the CB was glued to the inside of the receiver the entire route, and he threw it anyway. No excuse…that one is on Sam. But he is almost putting too much pressure on himself, and that manifests itself as indecision.

The entire second half boils down to the incompetence of Rhoads and his staff to coach during a football game. Iowa made defensive adjustments that our O-line couldn’t handle and it absolutely shut down our running game. In the second half we ran for 5 yards on 11 carries, with a long of 3 yards (sacks count as rush yards). Read that again: a player could fall forward 11 times and make more progress. With no threat of a running game, and our apparent unwillingness to throw farther than 10 yards downfield, how is any QB supposed to be successful? Iowa could play tight coverage with 7 defenders all within 15 yards of the LOS, stop the run/get pressure on an indecisive QB with the front 4, and take away the entire gameplan.

Our defense has improved an unbelievable amount since last year, and was the only reason we were remotely in the game. How much better could they have been if the offense had sustained even 3 drives in the second half? Tie game with 7 minutes left, even with the lack of offense and the huge plays from Iowa (QB runs, 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] and 21 conversion, punt return). All is not lost for the rest of the year if the offense can figure something out.

Better questions: What are we doing running three, 3 yard quick outs with two minutes left down by 7? Why do we lack the ability to make any adjustments during the game or at halftime? Why do we see zero improvement in our offensive line? Why can’t our QB throw to an open area and let our WR’s use their athletic ability to go get it? Why does our coaching staff have such little confidence in our running game that we punt on 4[SUP]th[/SUP] and inches, at a time in the game where we were actually moving the ball well? What exactly do we have to lose that would encourage such conservative play calling?

CPR and Mangino need to shoulder every single bit of the blame. Rhoads seems like a great guy, and it would be great for ISU if he could turn this around. But 7 years of poor recruiting and an almost complete lack of player development is to blame for the current state of the program. Sam could be a decent QB behind a good O-line with the threat of a running game; sadly he has neither. He cannot make up for the deficiencies that CPR has brought to the program.
 

Cyrealist

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2013
2,789
-2,088
63
69
He use to be able to run for fifty yards a game. Now he is a 240 yard passer with no running.
Very few quarterbacks will last the season running 20 times per game. Overall, it's a fact that the offense was nonexistent in the second half. We need to give Iowa credit for being a good team, but they aren't that good. Either the play calling was horrible or Richardson wasn't executing the plays properly. Either way, it is ultimately a coaching problem. we're not recruiting the right people or we're ruining them after they get here. It's possible that we won't win another game all year.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,632
23,890
113
Macomb, MI
Very few quarterbacks will last the season running 20 times per game. Overall, it's a fact that the offense was nonexistent in the second half. We need to give Iowa credit for being a good team, but they aren't that good. Either the play calling was horrible or Richardson wasn't executing the plays properly. Either way, it is ultimately a coaching problem. we're not recruiting the right people or we're ruining them after they get here. It's possible that we won't win another game all year.

He could if he slid after every run instead of going head first, asking for defenders to try and take his head off.
 

cyway

New Member
Apr 30, 2006
7
1
1
No inspiration to OL, falters in the clutch and can't connect on long passes much.

Still trying to comprehend why everyone is throwing Sam under the bus. From what I have seen so far is a line that isnt doing something the job they should be. The running backs seem to be non existent. Love how the quarterback is always the first one to catch all the heat even when there are way bigger issues with the offense.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,627
14,429
113
45
Way up there
Look at his first and last throws of the game...no pressure but still stared down 1 receiver the entire play and somehow didnt notice the defender standing directly in front of his target. I'm not sure how a SR QB who has played for 3 years makes that kind of play, especially multiple times.
 

cyway

New Member
Apr 30, 2006
7
1
1
One player should not be getting blamed for the widespread dysfunction throughout the program, and I don’t think most people blame Sam for the loss. The interception at the end was the most glaring and obvious candidate for people to jump on, because it was in crunch time, and because it was quite possibly the worst decision I have ever seen an experienced QB make. He stared him down for 3 full seconds, the CB was glued to the inside of the receiver the entire route, and he threw it anyway. No excuse…that one is on Sam. But he is almost putting too much pressure on himself, and that manifests itself as indecision.

The entire second half boils down to the incompetence of Rhoads and his staff to coach during a football game. Iowa made defensive adjustments that our O-line couldn’t handle and it absolutely shut down our running game. In the second half we ran for 5 yards on 11 carries, with a long of 3 yards (sacks count as rush yards). Read that again: a player could fall forward 11 times and make more progress. With no threat of a running game, and our apparent unwillingness to throw farther than 10 yards downfield, how is any QB supposed to be successful? Iowa could play tight coverage with 7 defenders all within 15 yards of the LOS, stop the run/get pressure on an indecisive QB with the front 4, and take away the entire gameplan.

Our defense has improved an unbelievable amount since last year, and was the only reason we were remotely in the game. How much better could they have been if the offense had sustained even 3 drives in the second half? Tie game with 7 minutes left, even with the lack of offense and the huge plays from Iowa (QB runs, 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] and 21 conversion, punt return). All is not lost for the rest of the year if the offense can figure something out.

Better questions: What are we doing running three, 3 yard quick outs with two minutes left down by 7? Why do we lack the ability to make any adjustments during the game or at halftime? Why do we see zero improvement in our offensive line? Why can’t our QB throw to an open area and let our WR’s use their athletic ability to go get it? Why does our coaching staff have such little confidence in our running game that we punt on 4[SUP]th[/SUP] and inches, at a time in the game where we were actually moving the ball well? What exactly do we have to lose that would encourage such conservative play calling?

CPR and Mangino need to shoulder every single bit of the blame. Rhoads seems like a great guy, and it would be great for ISU if he could turn this around. But 7 years of poor recruiting and an almost complete lack of player development is to blame for the current state of the program. Sam could be a decent QB behind a good O-line with the threat of a running game; sadly he has neither. He cannot make up for the deficiencies that CPR has brought to the program.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
One player should not be getting blamed for the widespread dysfunction throughout the program, and I don’t think most people blame Sam for the loss. The interception at the end was the most glaring and obvious candidate for people to jump on, because it was in crunch time, and because it was quite possibly the worst decision I have ever seen an experienced QB make. He stared him down for 3 full seconds, the CB was glued to the inside of the receiver the entire route, and he threw it anyway. No excuse…that one is on Sam. But he is almost putting too much pressure on himself, and that manifests itself as indecision.

The entire second half boils down to the incompetence of Rhoads and his staff to coach during a football game. Iowa made defensive adjustments that our O-line couldn’t handle and it absolutely shut down our running game. In the second half we ran for 5 yards on 11 carries, with a long of 3 yards (sacks count as rush yards). Read that again: a player could fall forward 11 times and make more progress. With no threat of a running game, and our apparent unwillingness to throw farther than 10 yards downfield, how is any QB supposed to be successful? Iowa could play tight coverage with 7 defenders all within 15 yards of the LOS, stop the run/get pressure on an indecisive QB with the front 4, and take away the entire gameplan.

Our defense has improved an unbelievable amount since last year, and was the only reason we were remotely in the game. How much better could they have been if the offense had sustained even 3 drives in the second half? Tie game with 7 minutes left, even with the lack of offense and the huge plays from Iowa (QB runs, 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] and 21 conversion, punt return). All is not lost for the rest of the year if the offense can figure something out.

Better questions: What are we doing running three, 3 yard quick outs with two minutes left down by 7? Why do we lack the ability to make any adjustments during the game or at halftime? Why do we see zero improvement in our offensive line? Why can’t our QB throw to an open area and let our WR’s use their athletic ability to go get it? Why does our coaching staff have such little confidence in our running game that we punt on 4[SUP]th[/SUP] and inches, at a time in the game where we were actually moving the ball well? What exactly do we have to lose that would encourage such conservative play calling?

CPR and Mangino need to shoulder every single bit of the blame. Rhoads seems like a great guy, and it would be great for ISU if he could turn this around. But 7 years of poor recruiting and an almost complete lack of player development is to blame for the current state of the program. Sam could be a decent QB behind a good O-line with the threat of a running game; sadly he has neither. He cannot make up for the deficiencies that CPR has brought to the program.

Everyone was close to the line of scrimmage in the second half, but MM and SR chose not to throw deep anyway. That is a problem.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
Look at his first and last throws of the game...no pressure but still stared down 1 receiver the entire play and somehow didnt notice the defender standing directly in front of his target. I'm not sure how a SR QB who has played for 3 years makes that kind of play, especially multiple times.

He did complete the pass to the other side for our only turnover.
 

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,806
3,698
113
Menlo, Iowa
After watching the game again. Sam had a good first half. He made good decisions, and threw the ball well. In the 2nd half the fell apart, didn't scan the field had time to pass the ball, had open receivers, and forced a lot of throws.
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
I would love to put that to the test. Again I reference Iowa and the way they stuck with an average QB last year.
Granted its only 2 games, but either Davis got a lot smarter or the QB they have has a higher skill set. Unless you have some other explanation.



Maybe ISU does not have a higher skill set waiting in the wings.

Will just agree to disagree.

Iowa got almost nothing they wanted to get. Beathard flat out beat us doing his own thing.
 

Tre4ISU

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 30, 2008
28,211
9,323
113
Estherville
You guys do realize we were only in that game in the first half is because of Sam putting two balls in about a square foot window right? We can't run the ball in an offense designed to be able to do that. That makes it awfully hard.
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,479
14,356
113
After watching the game again. Sam had a good first half. He made good decisions, and threw the ball well. In the 2nd half the fell apart, didn't scan the field had time to pass the ball, had open receivers, and forced a lot of throws.

I saw a lot of the same thing. Sam did make some big 3rd down throws in the first half. But in that second half, I saw a QB who was completely indecisive. Many times rather than make a decision to either throw it or take off, he just sat there in the pocket and did nothing. Just waited and held the ball until the pressure finally got to him. It was a apparent a second or two earlier that Sam was definitely not going to throw the ball. And Sam needs to then make the decision to take off. If Beathard had reacted the same way as Sam, then he is tackled for a safety. He does not make those big runs that bailed out the Hawks. It is a completely different game. I don't think that Sam is a bad QB. But at some point, we might have to look at option B. The offense that we had in the second half was non-existent. And so we must hold everyone responsible, including Sam.....and Mangino himself. The offense was pitiful, in the second half.
 

carvers4math

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2012
21,353
17,736
113
It looked like Sam was just locked onto Lazard the entire second half. It seemed like almost every pass went his way and Sam wasn't even looking to the other side of the field. I'd have to re watch the game but from my seat it looked like there where other receivers open but Sam just stared down his number 1 option.

I very much agree with this. That being said, I am not sure why, given the size of Lazard's defender, he wasn't just throwing the ball up high to him, at least on the sideline routes, and let him go up and get it.

I'm not thrilled with the play-calling.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron