Why was Baylor selected instead of TCU

LutherClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2008
1,169
47
48
Phoenix, AZ
Admittedly, it's difficult to be a Baylor football fan these days. But may I please enlighten my BIG VII comrades in the differences between Baylor and TCU - pre-Big VII. I was a Baylor student from 1985-89 and a win over TCU was almost assured. In fact, they were scheduled as our homecoming date every year they played in Waco. (yes, I realize Baylor has taken that position in the Big VII).

Look at the last 12 Years of Southwest Conference (1983-1995)
Overall Record
Baylor 87-60-2 - that's 58% winning percentage
TCU 59-83-3 Frogs won just 41% of their games

Baylor went to 6 bowls. TCU just 2. And Baylor had a better record even though they played tougher teams. During this time, TCU played two (2!) Top 25 non conference opponents and Baylor played 12. During these last dozen years of the Southwest Conference, Baylor was ranked in Top 10 twice (1986 #9 and 1991 #8) and beat #3 USC in 1985.

Not one time during the last dozen years of the SWC, did TCU finish with a better league record than Baylor.

Baylor vs TCU Series (head to head)
Baylor had 9 wins. TCU 4.

Average Home Attendance for Baylor/TCU game
in Waco 37,267; in Fort Worth 26,593
40% more @ Baylor home games for series.

Surely, there wouldn't be any question at all about which team would be picked to go to the Big VII. Horned Frog Bubble Buster But bottom line, 40% more people in seats makes a big difference.

When the decision was announced, I gulped and thought, great, now we get to add OU, OSU, Nebraska, Iowa St, etc, all of whom have better programs than Rice, TCU, SMU & Houston. No more walk-in-the-park games on Saturday.

I believe what we have is an illustration of the old "success breeds success" cliched theory. TCU, who has been in, what, three different conferences since 1995 has not played the caliber of teams that Iowa St and Baylor have to play every year.

Add that to having a little luck (Franchione leaving) and some smarts (promoting Patterson) and this all helped to get TCU some wins, bowl games and nat'l exposure. This often = better recruits and more victories in the future.

I struggle with the conundrum of whether I'd like to

  • be crying about how I don't get any respect in football for beating San Diego State, Colorado State and UNLV (and forgetting to note that they've only won the MWC title one time). OR
  • Struggle in football in the Big 12 like my Baylor Bears do.
Surely Cyclone fans can identify somewhat with this quandry. TCU Grads, who have talked for years about kicking Baylor out of the Big VII, now talk about kicking ISU out of the conference. I just hope TCU either gets snubbed by the BCS or gets their clocks cleaned in a bowl.

CM

EXCELLENT post! Welcome aboard!

You bring up some very interesting points. I would tend to agree that we look at Baylor through a modern lense and don't consider what Baylor was when the conference formed.
 

1100011CS

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2007
16,128
5,847
113
Marshalltown
---------------- Now playing: Rise Against - amber changing via FoxyTunes
Admittedly, it's difficult to be a Baylor football fan these days. But may I please enlighten my BIG VII comrades in the differences between Baylor and TCU - pre-Big VII. I was a Baylor student from 1985-89 and a win over TCU was almost assured. In fact, they were scheduled as our homecoming date every year they played in Waco. (yes, I realize Baylor has taken that position in the Big VII).

Look at the last 12 Years of Southwest Conference (1983-1995)
Overall Record
Baylor 87-60-2 - that's 58% winning percentage
TCU 59-83-3 Frogs won just 41% of their games

Baylor went to 6 bowls. TCU just 2. And Baylor had a better record even though they played tougher teams. During this time, TCU played two (2!) Top 25 non conference opponents and Baylor played 12. During these last dozen years of the Southwest Conference, Baylor was ranked in Top 10 twice (1986 #9 and 1991 #8) and beat #3 USC in 1985.

Not one time during the last dozen years of the SWC, did TCU finish with a better league record than Baylor.

Baylor vs TCU Series (head to head)
Baylor had 9 wins. TCU 4.

Average Home Attendance for Baylor/TCU game
in Waco
37,267; in Fort Worth 26,593
40% more @ Baylor home games for series.

Surely, there wouldn't be any question at all about which team would be picked to go to the Big VII. Horned Frog Bubble Buster But bottom line, 40% more people in seats makes a big difference.

When the decision was announced, I gulped and thought, great, now we get to add OU, OSU, Nebraska, Iowa St, etc, all of whom have better programs than Rice, TCU, SMU & Houston. No more walk-in-the-park games on Saturday.

I believe what we have is an illustration of the old "success breeds success" cliched theory. TCU, who has been in, what, three different conferences since 1995 has not played the caliber of teams that Iowa St and Baylor have to play every year.

Add that to having a little luck (Franchione leaving) and some smarts (promoting Patterson) and this all helped to get TCU some wins, bowl games and nat'l exposure. This often = better recruits and more victories in the future.

I struggle with the conundrum of whether I'd like to

  • be crying about how I don't get any respect in football for beating San Diego State, Colorado State and UNLV (and forgetting to note that they've only won the MWC title one time). OR
  • Struggle in football in the Big 12 like my Baylor Bears do.
Surely Cyclone fans can identify somewhat with this quandry. TCU Grads, who have talked for years about kicking Baylor out of the Big VII, now talk about kicking ISU out of the conference. I just hope TCU either gets snubbed by the BCS or gets their clocks cleaned in a bowl.

CM

What is Big VII? Was there a Big 7 at one time?
 

joefrog

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2008
8,207
2,543
113
Clive, Iowa
Actually in many sports Baylor is very, very good. It seems they are all in, either great or real bad. And pretty much stay that way.I know football, the sport, is awesome, but people get caught up on that too much at times. On the whole, I bet Baylor wins quite a bit in sports, and represents the Big12 well.

Baylor is actually a fine university with some proud alumni, I just don't get how they don't have more fan support. I have not been to Waco, although will probably get there sometime in the next year. Is it really that bad? Pictures of the campus look great, and I am guessing it has some great facilities too. Does Texas just get caught up in UT and aTm and the rest are afterthoughts? I would like to hear a Baylor fan's perspective.

I think the main reason they are in the Big12 is that they deserved to be at the time, and still do, but also some heavy lobbying by Governor Ann Richards. I am happy and proud to have them in the conference. People need to realize that if Baylor can get dropped from the conference, then so can ISU. I hate to type that, but I believe it to be a fact.
 

cyhiphopp

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
33,276
14,551
113
Ankeny
I think it should be embarrassing for TCU to be so good at football and still have atrocious attendance figures.
 

bcmoseley

New Member
Nov 16, 2009
7
1
3
EXCELLENT post! Welcome aboard!

You bring up some very interesting points. I would tend to agree that we look at Baylor through a modern lense and don't consider what Baylor was when the conference formed.

Sad, but true. My wife's little sister attended Baylor in the early 2000's and looks at me as if I'm from another planet when I start talking about Baylor's bowl games, or their beating Texas 50-7 (1989).
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,478
28,862
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
Actually in many sports Baylor is very, very good. It seems they are all in, either great or real bad. And pretty much stay that way.I know football, the sport, is awesome, but people get caught up on that too much at times. On the whole, I bet Baylor wins quite a bit in sports, and represents the Big12 well.

Baylor is actually a fine university with some proud alumni, I just don't get how they don't have more fan support. I have not been to Waco, although will probably get there sometime in the next year. Is it really that bad? Pictures of the campus look great, and I am guessing it has some great facilities too. Does Texas just get caught up in UT and aTm and the rest are afterthoughts? I would like to hear a Baylor fan's perspective.

I think the main reason they are in the Big12 is that they deserved to be at the time, and still do, but also some heavy lobbying by Governor Ann Richards. I am happy and proud to have them in the conference. People need to realize that if Baylor can get dropped from the conference, then so can ISU. I hate to type that, but I believe it to be a fact.

Go there for a game. Yeesh... I've seen better tailgating at FCS games. The people there seemed so indifferent, and aloof, as if talking to riff-raff Iowans from a public university was beneath them. The donor lot right outside of Floyd Casey was completely empty 1.5 hrs prior to kick off. See the pic

EDIT: for some reason, you can't make the pic bigger, but you can see how empty it is. One car way down in the corner.
 

bcmoseley

New Member
Nov 16, 2009
7
1
3
Baylor is actually a fine university with some proud alumni, I just don't get how they don't have more fan support. I have not been to Waco, although will probably get there sometime in the next year. Is it really that bad? Pictures of the campus look great, and I am guessing it has some great facilities too. Does Texas just get caught up in UT and aTm and the rest are afterthoughts? I would like to hear a Baylor fan's perspective.

Baylor fans support winning programs. Or at least ones that look like they have promise. After beating Wake Forest in game one, Baylor drew 40,000 for the Connecticut game (less than 500 visitor tickets sold). Then our boy wonder, QB Robert Griffin III was injured and it's been uphill since then.

Baylor's biggest recruiting hurdle in football is Baylor's success, or lack thereof. Other schools would knock Baylor saying you won't go to NFL if you go to Baylor, but that's not a valid argument since the #2 pick in the draft this year was a Baylor grad (Jason Smith).

Baylor's facilities are nice and getting nicer all the time. They just completed the new indoor practice facility (Baylor and A&M were the last to get one) and the residence hall/athletic facilities are top-notch.

Baylor's second biggest
recruiting hurdle is getting Texas kids to stay in state.
We cannot keep out-of-state schools from dipping into the best talent pool of high school football players. Hello, Iowa State has TWENTY Texans on its football squad. OU and OSU probably have more than that. If we kept 75% of our players in state, even Baylor could be a national power.

BTW, Texas gets the creme de la creme of just about any athlete in the nation right now. Texas A&M falls behind Texas Tech and probably TCU in recruiting now.

Look, I may be missing something, but if Baylor could put together a couple of winning seasons in football, they've got an excellent argument to appeal to a players family (or to his mama) that makes Baylor different (but maybe not for everyone) than other Big 12 schools:

  • Christian university (but not too Christian--i.e Jerry Falwell's Liberty U);
  • great education - highest grad rate of any Big 12 school;
  • close to home, since Waco is in the center of the state, so Mama can see most of the games in person.
 

CyBobby

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
7,561
2,130
113
Central Iowa
1) private school, that way finances for the conference can be kept private

2) Texas governor wanted Baylor in the conference.


We should add that the governor ann richards was an alum of baylor!!!!

I think that if the founders of the big 12 had it to do over again they would have taken a longer look at tcu....Just my speculation though.....
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,478
28,862
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
In all fairness, Baylor was quite a bit better than TCU in football at the time of conference formation. And, as pathetic as Baylor's attendance #'s are, TCU's are considerably worse and they have a much better team right now. I can easily see why Baylor got the nod.
 

joefrog

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2008
8,207
2,543
113
Clive, Iowa
In all fairness, Baylor was quite a bit better than TCU in football at the time of conference formation. And, as pathetic as Baylor's attendance #'s are, TCU's are considerably worse and they have a much better team right now. I can easily see why Baylor got the nod.

How can that be possible with TCU? They have been great for years, and are right there in the middle of the state, that is absolutely chock full of football fans. Shocking tbh.

I must say though, I never seem to hear about TCU in any other sports besides football. I do seem to hear Baylor mentioned quite a bit in others.

Also, I think Baylor's coach might be able to get it turned around, and he was a good hire. Houston is looking pretty good, and I think that is mostly his old system and/or players.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,478
28,862
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
How can that be possible with TCU? They have been great for years, and are right there in the middle of the state, that is absolutely chock full of football fans. Shocking tbh.

I must say though, I never seem to hear about TCU in any other sports besides football. I do seem to hear Baylor mentioned quite a bit in others.

Also, I think Baylor's coach might be able to get it turned around, and he was a good hire. Houston is looking pretty good, and I think that is mostly his old system and/or players.


I don't know, but it is. Per Phil Steele: TCU's average attendance last year = 30,389
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,634
23,892
113
Macomb, MI
Actually in many sports Baylor is very, very good. It seems they are all in, either great or real bad. And pretty much stay that way.I know football, the sport, is awesome, but people get caught up on that too much at times. On the whole, I bet Baylor wins quite a bit in sports, and represents the Big12 well.

Baylor is actually a fine university with some proud alumni, I just don't get how they don't have more fan support. I have not been to Waco, although will probably get there sometime in the next year. Is it really that bad? Pictures of the campus look great, and I am guessing it has some great facilities too. Does Texas just get caught up in UT and aTm and the rest are afterthoughts? I would like to hear a Baylor fan's perspective.

I think the main reason they are in the Big12 is that they deserved to be at the time, and still do, but also some heavy lobbying by Governor Ann Richards. I am happy and proud to have them in the conference. People need to realize that if Baylor can get dropped from the conference, then so can ISU. I hate to type that, but I believe it to be a fact.

Pretty sure that by charter, as an original member of the Big 6, ISU cannot be dropped by the rest of the Big 12 just because the Texas schools want them gone. If it weren't the case I'm not sure ISU would have been included in the first place.
 

d4nim4l

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 23, 2008
4,810
181
63
West Des Moines, IA
Had they not paid their players and been hit with the death penalty I bet SMU would have been the most attractive choice when talks started in the mid 90s. They were on their way to a national powerhouse before the death penalty and would have taken care of having a team in the Dallas area.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,634
23,892
113
Macomb, MI
Had they not paid their players and been hit with the death penalty I bet SMU would have been the most attractive choice when talks started in the mid 90s. They were on their way to a national powerhouse before the death penalty and would have taken care of having a team in the Dallas area.

While I tend to agree (and have argued in the past) with that assessment, it could also be argued that without paying their players SMU never would have been on the doorstep to becoming a national powerhouse. Then again, they were doing what virtually everyone else was doing in the SWC.
 

WalkingCY

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2008
6,895
2,592
113
Kansas City
Pretty sure that by charter, as an original member of the Big 6, ISU cannot be dropped by the rest of the Big 12 just because the Texas schools want them gone. If it weren't the case I'm not sure ISU would have been included in the first place.


Yeah, eat it state of Texas.

Seriously though, do they know how to look at history? From 2000- now we have some good bowl history there. But they want us out? What the hell?

And Basketball? Hello? 2 conference titles in that time as well. Not to mention we were in the NCAA's more than most teams in Texas. This is why I can't stand their backwards state....and never will.
 

d4nim4l

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 23, 2008
4,810
181
63
West Des Moines, IA
While I tend to agree (and have argued in the past) with that assessment, it could also be argued that without paying their players SMU never would have been on the doorstep to becoming a national powerhouse. Then again, they were doing what virtually everyone else was doing in the SWC.

I looked in to this more after posting that. They were playing 13 players and had paid a few in the past. It looked to be the ones with the poorest families that they were doing it for. No doubt they were contributors as a 3rd string safety probably would not get the same treatment.

However, we will never know if their star QB or HB was getting paid $5K a month to be there.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron