I looked up Jennifer Lopez on Facebook. I think that meanswe're married.
Something something something Wisconsin something something something Hawkeyes?
I looked up Jennifer Lopez on Facebook. I think that meanswe're married.
I looked up Jennifer Lopez on Facebook. I think that meanswe're married.
She's a freshman in my sons HS. Kinda young for you.
Depends. What state?
And honestly it takes all my energy to not please a 47 year old woman.
Rusty Mansell @Mansell247To be clear Alabama NEVER offered Zeb Noland, but they did talk with his family the last few days on several calls. @SWiltfong247
I looked up Jennifer Lopez on Facebook. I think that meanswe're married.
The ignorance on this board is maddening!!! There is more than one scouting/recruiting site out there for pete sakes... Let's just use these 4 as an example ESPN, Scout, Rivals, and 24/7. Now 3 of those 4 say that Zeb is a 3 star top 50 QB, yet for some reason people like to pick out the 1 outlier that says he is a 2 star and a chump? I just do not understand the logic behind it.....
So, what kind of offense are we running next year? How does Noland move?
Lanning is our only "dual threat". These other guys are "pro-style" and don't move as well. College calls for a QB with wheels. Hell, even the Iowa QBs are labeled pro-style, but they call all move well.
247 Sports:
Cyclones QBs in 2016
Lanning (DT #72)
Starcevich (Pro - NR)
Delira (Pro #69)
Noland (Pro #56)
Iowa QBs 2016
Beathard (Pro #38)
Wiegers (Pro #31)
Boyle (DT #12)
Cook (Ath #110)
Stanley (Pro #38)
Just read that even with ISU getting all these former Toledo commits that we're still ranked last in recruiting among the Big 12. Does Zeb raise us a notch?
So, what kind of offense are we running next year? How does Noland move?
Lanning is our only "dual threat". These other guys are "pro-style" and don't move as well. College calls for a QB with wheels. Hell, even the Iowa QBs are labeled pro-style, but they call all move well.
Do yourself a favor before you post about this again and watch Zeb's senior season highlight video on Hudl.
Personally, I view the "Pro" vs. "Dual" distinction slightly differently. The "Pro" guys are better at throwing the ball, slightly less favorable in *running* the ball. "Dual" guys have more speed as in 40-time and can run better, but sometimes are less gifted in throwing the ball.
My counter to your question is: what would you rather have your QB's best traits be, running or throwing?
A 'pocket passer' can have good mobility and can occasionally be effective in a scramble game, without being a 'running' QB. Personally, I've hoped ISU would recruit more "Pro" QB recruits who have decent mobility rather than the true "Dual threat" recruits.
Do yourself a favor before you post about this again and watch Zeb's senior season highlight video on Hudl.
Personally, I view the "Pro" vs. "Dual" distinction slightly differently. The "Pro" guys are better at throwing the ball, slightly less favorable in *running* the ball. "Dual" guys have more speed as in 40-time and can run better, but sometimes are less gifted in throwing the ball.
My counter to your question is: what would you rather have your QB's best traits be, running or throwing?
A 'pocket passer' can have good mobility and can occasionally be effective in a scramble game, without being a 'running' QB. Personally, I've hoped ISU would recruit more "Pro" QB recruits who have decent mobility rather than the true "Dual threat" recruits.
[video]https://youtu.be/wMxJeNEfqDs?t=5m56s[/video]Thanks for the insight genius. I watched Noland's video and it was the reason for my question. I also looked at his stats (Max Preps): 73 of 169 (46% completion), 1629 yards, 17 TDs, 4 Int. Loves to throw it deep (20 yds/completion), accuracy is a question. There is no mention of his rushing stats and minimal video of him moving in the pocket or running. Hence my question: Does have wheels? What kind of offense do we see CMC installing.
I don't mean to go off on a rant here, but...Yes, we all want a Pro-Style passer that can move. Ideally, we all want Aaron Rogers. Ok, back to reality, we are graduating half our OL and starting TE. We will have holes in the OL, accordingly there is a need for our QBs to have mobility to escape harms way. Now, back to Noland, I realize it is ideal that he redshirts, gets coached up, etc. Truth is, with Richardson graduating and Rohach transferring, there is a chance Noland is the back-up and may have to play immediately should injuries occur or if Lanning gets the yips, etc. So, back to my simple question - can Noland move?
Yes, I undertand the distinction between DTs and Pro-Style. Again, we all want Aaron Rogers - strong arm, accuracy, quick release, pocket presence, ahtletic, protects the football, poised, intelligent, clutch, etc. But, simple dual threat-ish QBs have been killing us the last several years, guys that didn't have rocket arms, but they had decent arms, moxy and moved well enough to move the chains throwing and running.
This year...QB's with legs were key in making us 3-9 instead of 8-4.
CJ Beathard - 77 yards and a few key first downs
Boykin - 74 yards and a few key first downs/TDs
Russell - 64 yards made a difference until he was knocked out of the season
Huebner - 90 yards made a huge difference
Howard - 73 yards were key to 30-6 victory
in 2014 it was Wentz, Boykin, Knight, Waters, Petty...they killed us in the air and their mobility gave us head aches.
We aren't suppose to talk Hawkeyes on here, but Beathard's legs and moxy are the difference in their 7-5 vs 12-0 year.
Summary: We need mobile QBs (with all other wonderful QB attributes). I hope Noland is mobile.
Thanks for the insight genius. I watched Noland's video and it was the reason for my question. I also looked at his stats (Max Preps): 73 of 169 (46% completion), 1629 yards, 17 TDs, 4 Int. Loves to throw it deep (20 yds/completion), accuracy is a question. There is no mention of his rushing stats and minimal video of him moving in the pocket or running. Hence my question: Does have wheels? What kind of offense do we see CMC installing.
I don't mean to go off on a rant here, but...Yes, we all want a Pro-Style passer that can move. Ideally, we all want Aaron Rogers. Ok, back to reality, we are graduating half our OL and starting TE. We will have holes in the OL, accordingly there is a need for our QBs to have mobility to escape harms way. Now, back to Noland, I realize it is ideal that he redshirts, gets coached up, etc. Truth is, with Richardson graduating and Rohach transferring, there is a chance Noland is the back-up and may have to play immediately should injuries occur or if Lanning gets the yips, etc. So, back to my simple question - can Noland move?
Yes, I undertand the distinction between DTs and Pro-Style. Again, we all want Aaron Rogers - strong arm, accuracy, quick release, pocket presence, ahtletic, protects the football, poised, intelligent, clutch, etc. But, simple dual threat-ish QBs have been killing us the last several years, guys that didn't have rocket arms, but they had decent arms, moxy and moved well enough to move the chains throwing and running.
This year...QB's with legs were key in making us 3-9 instead of 8-4.
CJ Beathard - 77 yards and a few key first downs
Boykin - 74 yards and a few key first downs/TDs
Russell - 64 yards made a difference until he was knocked out of the season
Huebner - 90 yards made a huge difference
Howard - 73 yards were key to 30-6 victory
in 2014 it was Wentz, Boykin, Knight, Waters, Petty...they killed us in the air and their mobility gave us head aches.
We aren't suppose to talk Hawkeyes on here, but Beathard's legs and moxy are the difference in their 7-5 vs 12-0 year.
Summary: We need mobile QBs (with all other wonderful QB attributes). I hope Noland is mobile.