I expect him to say the truth...which he did.
Believe what you want though.
And Tiger Woods denied marital problems after the Thanksgiving accident too...
I expect him to say the truth...which he did.
Believe what you want though.
So do I. ISU is a perfect fit in the Big 10, especially if MU and NU are already there.
The more I logically think about this, the more I sincerely believe that first, not only is the Big 12 going to survive the apocalypse (not without taking hits, however), ISU will be a part of it (assuming it isn't granted an invite to the Big 10). The reason why I think this is:
Texas/A&M/OU/OSU AREN'T going to the SEC no matter how much ESPN keeps wanting the issue, for three reasons:
1. Neither Texas nor Oklahoma wants to have to share its revenues with the rest of the SEC, nor does it want to put its conference domination in jeopardy.
2. I don't think the SEC wants any of those four schools, either. They don't want Texas because they would basically have to give up control of the conference to them, and considering that kind of control basically destroyed the SWC and has put the Big 12 on the brink, the SEC isn't in a position where they NEED Texas, so they don't have to cater to Texas' demands. And as appealing as Oklahoma might be, they don't want to have to package OSU with it just to get them in order to claim a 3.5 million population state in the same way everyone argues that the Big 10 doesn't need ISU.
3. The SEC isn't looking to expand west, they're looking to expand north and east. What I heard on the radio this weekend is the potential schools the SEC is actually targeting is all ACC teams, those teams being Georgia Tech, Florida St, Clemson, and the big daddy - North Carolina. The SEC's access to the state of North Carolina >>>>> Oklahoma.
Considering this, here's how I think the conferences realign:
Big 10:
Nebraska
Missouri
Iowa
Minnesota
Illinois
Northwestern
Wisconsin
Indiana
Purdue
Ohio St
Michigan
Michigan St
Penn St
Maryland
Virginia
Rutgers
SEC:
Florida
Florida St
Georgia
Georgia Tech
Clemson
South Carolina
North Carolina
Kentucky
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Alabama
Auburn
Ole Miss
Miss St
LSU
Arkansas
ACC:
Miami
Duke
Wake Forest
NC State
Virginia Tech
West Virginia
Syracuse
Boston College
Connecticut
South Florida
Pittsburgh
Louisville
Cincinnati
East Carolina
Then the Big 12 and Pac 10, with their "alliance", will divide up the members of the MWC and WAC as they see fit (with Colorado potentially going to the Pac 10).
Their revenue would be higher in the SEC or Big10 then it is currently, so why would they care if they had to share?Neither Texas nor Oklahoma wants to have to share its revenues with the rest of the SEC.
The difference being ISU actually beats NU every so often... :wink:
NU only dominates ISU 11% more than OSU dominates Iowa....that goes against what many in this state would like to believe.Iowa is 14-44-3 against OSU
ISU is 17-84-2 against Nebraska
They have a much larger athletic budget than ISU, and they play baseball (and are good at it), which is good for the Big Ten TV network. Baseball is America's pastime, you know...
NU only dominates ISU 11% more than OSU dominates Iowa....that goes against what many in this state would like to believe.
Yes, congrats to OSU and NU!congrats?....
Are we really going to argue about who sucks less now?
The "large budget" is because of Big Red football revenue. We come back to that again.
Nebraska baseball is currently in last place, 7-14, in the Big 12, and 23-24 overall. They aren't being sought by the Big Ten for their "baseball program."
Please.
no way in hell, sorry ISU will not bring more money to the big 10 than what their share of the take would be. All of Iowa already has the big10 network. but i would love to have what you are smokingIf those 4 teams all accept, I think ISU might have a decent shot at being the 16th team.
I live in North Carolina, no way NC is going SEC, UNC is a top academic school, huge history in the ACC, no reason to jump ship to a subpar basketball conference.The more I logically think about this, the more I sincerely believe that first, not only is the Big 12 going to survive the apocalypse (not without taking hits, however), ISU will be a part of it (assuming it isn't granted an invite to the Big 10). The reason why I think this is:
Texas/A&M/OU/OSU AREN'T going to the SEC no matter how much ESPN keeps wanting the issue, for three reasons:
1. Neither Texas nor Oklahoma wants to have to share its revenues with the rest of the SEC, nor does it want to put its conference domination in jeopardy.
2. I don't think the SEC wants any of those four schools, either. They don't want Texas because they would basically have to give up control of the conference to them, and considering that kind of control basically destroyed the SWC and has put the Big 12 on the brink, the SEC isn't in a position where they NEED Texas, so they don't have to cater to Texas' demands. And as appealing as Oklahoma might be, they don't want to have to package OSU with it just to get them in order to claim a 3.5 million population state in the same way everyone argues that the Big 10 doesn't need ISU.
3. The SEC isn't looking to expand west, they're looking to expand north and east. What I heard on the radio this weekend is the potential schools the SEC is actually targeting is all ACC teams, those teams being Georgia Tech, Florida St, Clemson, and the big daddy - North Carolina. The SEC's access to the state of North Carolina >>>>> Oklahoma.
Considering this, here's how I think the conferences realign:
Big 10:
Nebraska
Missouri
Iowa
Minnesota
Illinois
Northwestern
Wisconsin
Indiana
Purdue
Ohio St
Michigan
Michigan St
Penn St
Maryland
Virginia
Rutgers
SEC:
Florida
Florida St
Georgia
Georgia Tech
Clemson
South Carolina
North Carolina
Kentucky
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Alabama
Auburn
Ole Miss
Miss St
LSU
Arkansas
ACC:
Miami
Duke
Wake Forest
NC State
Virginia Tech
West Virginia
Syracuse
Boston College
Connecticut
South Florida
Pittsburgh
Louisville
Cincinnati
East Carolina
Then the Big 12 and Pac 10, with their "alliance", will divide up the members of the MWC and WAC as they see fit (with Colorado potentially going to the Pac 10).
Have the Board of Regents say ISU or no U of Iowa like UVa did to get VaTech into the ACC...ISU will not bring more money to the big 10 than what their share of the take would be. All of Iowa already has the big10 network.
Perhaps being a big fish in a smaller pond wouldn't be all bad.
No doubt the buzz associated with football would be dampened, but
basketball might be more exciting.