Yeah they dropped the ball on that...Maybe if it'd been pretty eyes
Yeah they dropped the ball on that...Maybe if it'd been pretty eyes
Dh says rizzo is better at twerking than i. he's not wrong. also, if you find a gif, fowler looks like he's going to poop on her
Bryant is going to be on Jimmy Kimmel on Monday Night.I guessing Bryant didn't want to do it it. I was really surprised when he didn't talk at the Rally on Friday after the Parade.
Jason Hammel gone. I'm on board with the move, there just isn't much sense to have a guy on your payroll when you know for a fact that he can't help you in October, especially when this team could probably make the playoffs with me as the 5th starter. Montgomery to the rotation now I'd imagine.
Wish Hammel the best though, he will definitely be a nice addition for another team next season, and by all accounts he seemed like a really good guy.
Wow, that's real surprising and doesn't seem to make much sense to me. No team uses five starting pitchers in the postseason, so by your logic no team would pay a fifth starter during the regular season?
The Cubs have very little starting pitching depth, Zastrysny is far from a sure thing and with Wood and Cahill leaving they are definitely going to have bolster their starting pitching depth. I would have thought they would have picked up his option and traded him if they weren't planning on using him this year at least.
This. Outright declining his option does not seem smart when you could of traded him for something decent. Hard to ignore his good he was when he was on this season.Wow, that's real surprising and doesn't seem to make much sense to me. No team uses five starting pitchers in the postseason, so by your logic no team would pay a fifth starter during the regular season?
The Cubs have very little starting pitching depth, Zastrysny is far from a sure thing and with Wood and Cahill leaving they are definitely going to have bolster their starting pitching depth. I would have thought they would have picked up his option and traded him if they weren't planning on using him this year at least.
I would add if you are the fifth starter, and then not good enough to be in the pen when the manager doesn't trust most of those already there. Then you should probably go elsewhere.
This. Outright declining his option does not seem smart when you could of traded him for something decent. Hard to ignore his good he was when he was on this season.
Wow, that's real surprising and doesn't seem to make much sense to me. No team uses five starting pitchers in the postseason, so by your logic no team would pay a fifth starter during the regular season?
The Cubs have very little starting pitching depth, Zastrysny is far from a sure thing and with Wood and Cahill leaving they are definitely going to have bolster their starting pitching depth. I would have thought they would have picked up his option and traded him if they weren't planning on using him this year at least.
I'm not saying that no team should pay a fifth starter during the regular season. Hell, Hendricks was our fifth starter at the beginning of this year. I'm saying I'm fine with this move because Hammel has proven time and time again that he is not going to be effective late in the season.
Obviously you have to have five starters to ease their workloads. But I'm not on board for paying a guy good money that you literally know will not be good enough to help you in October, and instead paying less for a guy who won't be much of a downgrade in the regular season, and then is able to help you out of the bullpen in the playoffs. Montgomery may or may not be good enough to be a factor in October after a full season of starting, but at least there is a chance that he is, whereas with Hammel there is not.
I agree with this. However, in a offseason where starting pitching FA depth is horrid, you DO NOT let him walk.