IMO the Big12 is in a sit back and wait position for the Big10 and SEC to create 2 super conferences aligned with Fox (Big10) and Disney (SEC).
If each super conference is 20 teams (4 - 5 team divisions), then the SEC needs 4 teams and the Big10 needs 6 teams.
So Iowa State will need to wait and see how HOT the SEC and Big10 view the Cyclones.
On the hotness scale, I would go:
10's - Notre Dame & Clemson.
9's - North Carolina & Virginia.
8's - Okie St (SEC), FSU, Miami.
7's - NC State, GA Tech, IA State.
That's 10 teams for 10 spots. The wildcards:
1) Can the Big10 or SEC make Pac12 schools work. If they want the Pac12 schools then I think ISU is definitely in the outside I think ISU is in a conference with Big12, ACC and Pac12 remnants.
2) How loyal are the SEC and Big10 to existing members? Do Rutgers, Vandy, etc. have a place at the table?
Rutgers football product is bad but people discount how good of a recruiting ground New Jersey is. PSU while not on the OSU level has had a lot of success since adding Rutgers and Maryland due to their proximity and recruiting. New Jersey and the Maryland/DC area is now usually #2 and #3 in terms of football recruits in the B1G footprint besides the subscription money. PSU has had some monster ratings games for the B1G.
People talk about streaming and value. The BTN and SEC and now ACC are still getting carriage even on all the streaming products besides cable and satellite and that will continue. The Big 12 was not going to and neither will the PAC. A league with either B12 and PAC 12 leftovers will be on ESPN Plus. So would a leftover B12 and AAC additions like UH, BYU & Cincy to name a few.
It would be interesting to know the value to the BTN of having a 9 pm CST time slot for live content by adding the 5-6 PAC properties they want the most.
Last edited: