Yep. Bottom line is we do not have a 4th game with Kansas State, but we do have a 3rd game with UCF. Stupid.
But UCF is a more recent National Champion
LMAO
Yep. Bottom line is we do not have a 4th game with Kansas State, but we do have a 3rd game with UCF. Stupid.
I get that other people have said that Nebby and Mizzu were bigger games and those ended.
But we had no control over those ending, they left and ended them.
We have control over conference schedules. There are many easy ways to continue the historic matchups and still play the others at least every other year.
Comparing the KSU matchup to Mizzu is Apples to Oranges. As the conference no longer controls Mizzus schedule etc.
There is a reason the B1G has made efforts to not only create rivalries, but also make efforts to protect them. Rivalries are money, excitement and publicity. Even if they are somewhat manufactured, or not as important on a national scale. If they increase the excitement even a little it is a win. I dont understand why the Big12 has not figured this out.
Consider the Nebby/Iowa "rivalry" there is no history, no national importance or interest, but they still ahve pushed it from day 1. Why? Because if they can create the rivalry, they can manufacture the hate and importance, it is a good thing for the schools and the conference. Even if it is only a minor amount of excitement etc.
We as in Pollard and the Conference.We have control?
Who is we? We the fans - no we don't. We the football staff - no they don't. We the AD - no he doesn't either.
It seems the people supportive of losing KSU are either so used to the conference handing ISU **** sandwiches that they will smile and eat it, or fans that are scared of Kansas State.
Here is the conference to ISU, "SAY IT WITH ME, YOU GET A THIRD GAME AGAINST UCF!!"
View attachment 118778
Forget K State for a minute. It just would have been nice (and easy, with no apparent cost!) if the powers that be would have accounted for history more with all the matchups. The history I care about most is with other Big 8 teams, and I’m guessing lots of other fans think/feel the same way.
Iowa is such a candy ass university.Iowa has 3 rivals, when others in the B1G only have 1.
there are a few in this sched that have 1 rival while others have none..
So what is the difference if some have 2 while others have 1.
The Big 8 died 27 years ago.Forget K State for a minute. It just would have been nice (and easy, with no apparent cost!) if the powers that be would have accounted for history more with all the matchups. The history I care about most is with other Big 8 teams, and I’m guessing lots of other fans think/feel the same way.
Where is this response, I would like to read it? "X"?There's a response from Pollard to a fan who was mad about Farmageddon. Pollard doesn't give a **** about Farmageddon, so he didn't advocate for any different result. It wasn't the Big 12 screwing ISU over.
Yeah. Cyclone Larry posted it.Where is this response, I would like to read it? "X"?
Out of order but I work in KC / with K State fans and they all think its stupid that its ending. It's not necessarily an "I hate you" rivalry but it is still a fun game to play / easyish for both teams fans to travel toAre K-State fans upset?
But the history of playing the Big 8 schools didnt. We still have a loooong history of playing KSU, KU, OSU.The Big 8 died 27 years ago.
its.Out of order but I work in KC / with K State fans and they all think its stupid that its ending. It's not necessarily an "I hate you" rivalry but it is still a fun game to play / easyish for both teams fans to travel to
Or we don't feel Kansas State was ever a rival and a force feeding "Farmageddon" doesn't add to making it a rival.