This is gonna be fun.
This one isn't as bad as initally thought.
This one isn't as bad as initally thought.
This is gonna be fun.
This one isn't as bad as initally thought.
Yeah, the explanation is much more reasonable. It used to be a rule in the NFL that the refs had to decide if a receiver would have come down in bounds, had the defender not pushed them. And if so, it could still be a TD. It was always controversial when they invoked that rule and they were right to do away with it
Ah ok.It's not a "Big 12" rule. It's in the NCAA book.
Ah ok.
I'm not watching him speak or anything. The tweets made it sound like a Big 12 rule.
Not a fan of the automatic first down for holding a gunner on a punt. That is the type of rule that will completely hose ISU at a critical point in a game.
It's a risky enough penalty that in very crucial late-game situations you may just automatically call for a fair catch and and not risk blocking the gunners.
Shouldn't being pushed out of bounds while attempting to make a catch be pass interference?Yeah, the explanation is much more reasonable. It used to be a rule in the NFL that the refs had to decide if a receiver would have come down in bounds, had the defender not pushed them. And if so, it could still be a TD. It was always controversial when they invoked that rule and they were right to do away with it
This is after the catch has been completed in air.Shouldn't being pushed out of bounds while attempting to make a catch be pass interference?
Not if the contact occurs after the receiver has touched the ball.Shouldn't being pushed out of bounds while attempting to make a catch be pass interference?
He went on to clarify in his next tweet that it's only going to be a first down for the punting team if the hold occurs basically immediately at the line of scrimmage.Not a fan of the automatic first down for holding a gunner on a punt. That is the type of rule that will completely hose ISU at a critical point in a game.
It's a risky enough penalty that in very crucial late-game situations you may just automatically call for a fair catch and and not risk blocking the gunners.
He went on to clarify in his next tweet that it's only going to be a first down for the punting team if the hold occurs basically immediately at the line of scrimmage.
He went on to clarify in his next tweet that it's only going to be a first down for the punting team if the hold occurs basically immediately at the line of scrimmage.
That's a better rule. With it being so inconsequential it makes me question why even make the change at all?
That's a better rule. With it being so inconsequential it makes me question why even make the change at all?
Yeah, I don't think it'll affect punts that often.The big change was for consistency on "regular" (non-special teams) plays. Before, defensive holding could either be an automatic first down or not, depending on the type of offensive play. Making it consistent there just ended up having a trickle-down effect to special teams, which then needed to be clarified.
Eventually, that applies to almost any rule. Even some rules you don't realize exist until it happens.That is the type of rule that will completely hose ISU at a critical point in a game.