So common opponents means nothing to you, head to head...nothing. Bad loses like I don't know West Virginia...nothing.
Dude, you're looking at this wrong. This has nothing to do with MY opinions. I'm trying to project what THE COMMITTEE will do, not what I would do. Just take a breath and step away from the keyboard.
Also just to engage with your incorrect basis for an argument for fun, let's look at record against common opponents, which the committee cares about ZERO percent. Against common opponents, ISU is 11-4 compared to Kansas being 10-5 against those same opponents. Outside of those opponents, Kansas best wins are UConn, Tennessee, and Kentucky. ISU's are VCU and Iowa. Yes, Kansas lost to West Virginia but does beating UConn, Tennessee, and Kentucky while losing to West Virginia outweigh beating West Virginia plus VCU and Iowa? I'm guessing the committee would say yes.
Now, losses DO MATTER. So If ISU wins out and doesn't win the Big 12 tournament while Kansas loses at Baylor and at Houston like they're projected to do while also not winning the Big 12 tournament, that would put them at 10 losses come Selection Sunday vs. Iowa State at 7 losses. ISU would be ahead of them on the seed list in that scenario.
I'm an ISU fan too, but our resume isn't so obviously better than Kansas's right now for you to act like I'm clueless for still having KU ahead of ISU. Once again, just let the next two weeks play out.