Their college numbers disagree
Saying Kempt was better than Stanley is laughable.
Their college numbers disagree
Saying Kempt was better than Stanley is laughable.
Kempt put up better numbers than Stanley. He was very accurate and he didn't have two top 20 draft picks to throw to either
Troll on brother, troll on.
Those are factual statements. How is that trolling?
Kempt > Stanley is laughable, not factual.
QB rating:
Kempt - 141.4
Stanley - 134.1
I know I know, those pesky facts
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL, and you wonder why everyone says you are trolling all the time. You think QB rating is the only QB stat? LOL.
Ok completion percentage:
Kempt - 66.7%
Stanley - 58.3%
Stanley did have a higher interception percentage though and way more fumbles. I'll give him that
Why am I not shocked you cherry pick stats as well as SOS?
So you agree that Tanner Morgan 80.2 QBR and Payton Ramsey 73.7 > Purdy and his 67.2 QBR
Tanner Morgan > Brock Purdy end of story. They are reasonably comparable accuracy wise but Morgan has a much stronger arm and quicker release.Why am I not shocked you cherry pick stats as well as SOS?
So you agree that Tanner Morgan 80.2 QBR and Payton Ramsey 73.7 > Purdy and his 67.2 QBR
Tanner Morgan > Brock Purdy end of story. They are reasonably comparable accuracy wise but Morgan has a much stronger arm and quicker release.
Purdy is not as strong as Morgan. That will be the knock on him when he comes outMorgan is very good. Purdy has a strong arm though
Kempt was too fragile. Stanley won more.Kempt and Purdy were both better than Stanley
Purdy is not as strong as Morgan. That will be the knock on him when he comes out
Wadley played in the Big Ten West with a way better OL
Stanley played in the Big Ten West with a way better OL AND had two top 20 draft picks to throw to and he was still less productive than Kempt
Who is "isu fan"?