I'm from the farm but we always called ground squirrels 'grennies.' We may have been negatively referring to people from grenada however.
Because when I think "attention-hungry people," I think of Asians.
I also have never heard of this term. I can understand the perception, and it's probably a poor choice in retrospect, but I can also assume that the guy who used the term assumed that everyone else knew it because he did.
It seemed like an appropriate time for my monthly post.I was waiting for you to weigh in on this one...
Yeah, I'm with you there.I was more offended by the ignorant letter to the editor comparing Asians studying here to the Russians stealing information during the Cold War, but to each their own.
I remember them being called "ditch tigers" in North Iowa.
Could have just been my uncle though.
Disagree totally. These comments make no sense when referencing a person.
"Just had a staring contest with a ground squirrel. They're fearless."
That makes more sense than if the quote was referencing a person? Having a staring contest with a ground squirrel seems pretty stupid to me.
"Saw a ground squirrel in the building. The invasion has begun."
This one actually makes sense. But it makes just as much sense if it were referencing a person who's not from here.
I haven't read the full story, so those two quotes may make more sense in context. But stand-alone, they still make sense if they were referring to a person.
I don't get the interperatation of "squintey's" meaning squirrels? Could somebody elaborate one that one for me?
And though I agree that it is sad, but I think it is correct in saying that a ton of the students picking up the paper just look to those. (Again, this doesn't mean I think that's fine). But does it really matter? The students get the paper free anyway. So even if less students pick it up now it's irrelevent.
"Just had a staring contest with a ground squirrel. They're fearless."
That makes more sense than if the quote was referencing a person? Having a staring contest with a ground squirrel seems pretty stupid to me.
"Saw a ground squirrel in the building. The invasion has begun."
This one actually makes sense. But it makes just as much sense if it were referencing a person who's not from here.
I haven't read the full story, so those two quotes may make more sense in context. But stand-alone, they still make sense if they were referring to a person.
I'm from the farm but we always called ground squirrels 'grennies.' We may have been negatively referring to people from grenada however.
This all happened while there was a debate in letters to the editor section that featured some, if not racist, then offensive opinions about Asians. That debate itself started with a letter that pointed out some definitely racist memes on that facebook page. And being a student at Iowa State, I can tell you that there are a lot of people that are just casually offensive towards Asians. Not saying there is rampant racism, we're a tolerant community; it's just that there's a problem that goes beyond the "oh, they're just being funny" excuse.
So, in an environment with that debate happening in the paper, it's easy to understand why the Daily experienced such a volatile response. Having grown up in Iowa, I know the term squinny as referring to a ground squirrel. But I would wager that most people here do not, and that the first thing they would assume "squintey" to be is a slur towards Asians. Think if you had never heard the term squinny before.
The Daily is doing what it needs to do, at least for now. Actually, they're going beyond that and trying to start a positive debate about the issue of racism. Maybe a bit of an overreaction on the Just Sayin's, but it says a lot that they're willing to do that - they know that a lot of students like that section.
Racial slurs in Daily reveal racism at Iowa State - Iowa State Daily: NewsTrembling bodies. Quivering lips. Tear-stained cheeks. This is what racism looks like, and it is here at Iowa State.
Pardon me, but how is this so bad? If a caucasian male/female got called a "cracker", I'd say 97% or more would just shrug it off. I'm completely against discrimination, but sticks, stones, words and you get the idea