Northwestern and Nebraska, but Nebraska has at least given Purdue, Minnesota and Wisconsin a game.Many of those teams in the west don’t have a pulse.
Northwestern and Nebraska, but Nebraska has at least given Purdue, Minnesota and Wisconsin a game.Many of those teams in the west don’t have a pulse.
Agree - Iowa is actually the epitome of ”win in the margins”. They do the little things that matter and win while having a horrible offense. That shows in the fact that they’re actually finding ways to win when their offense can’t do much.As much as I hate EIU, I will admit they win, because they do the little things that add up to big things which means wins in the end. Their special teams year after year are a strength, while ours is a huge weakness. They make field goals, and they have a freshman kicker also, their punts are not 38 yards but pushing 50, and they return punts instead of fair catching them and thereby setting up their horrible offense to get easier opportunities to score.
As great as our defense has played this year, we do not get turnovers, and way to often give up cheap touchdowns, EIU makes you earn every yard that they give up. They stunt in passing situations, blitz when necessary, keeping the offense guessing what they are going to do.
I hope you are using copy/paste. I’m worried you’re going to get carpal tunnel syndrome.Like running the same play 5 times without success in consecutive series and punting with one time out left.
Although Iowa has a very good defense this is a function of the terrible quarterback play in the Big 10. Mertz at Wisconsin, Morgan and Kaliakmanis at Minnesota, NW and Rutger’s QBs, none would sniff the field for any team in the Big 12. Casey Thompson left Texas because he had no chance of beating out Ewers. He wouldn’t start in the Big 12 either. This is a big reason why Big 10 football is so hard to watch.It would be nice to have the luck of Iowa. Every game they get a couple turnovers where the ball goes directly to a defender that is nowhere near the play. If a pass gets batted in the air, you can be sure it is going right to an Iowa defender, in stride.
I really want to believe this but then I see, missed kicks, dropped passes, poor oline play, etc. and I’m not so sure.We would have at least 3 more wins.
Minnesota was 1 of 8 in the second half for passing against Iowa. All they can do is run the ball. We would bury that offense. Wisconsin is not good.Northwestern and Nebraska, but Nebraska has at least given Purdue, Minnesota and Wisconsin a game.
Minnesota was 1 of 8 in the second half for passing against Iowa. All they can do is run the ball. We would bury that offense. Wisconsin is not good.
Feels like you’re giving some of those west teams a little too much credit with those comparisons but the fact remains that if you go 1 of 5 in the red zone or turn the ball over 5 times you would be lucky to beat Coe College.I would agree with that.
We’ve proven many times this year that our issues aren’t with the strength of the opposing team, their offense, or their defense - we’re equal opportunity losers this year. We lost to the best defenses and the worst defenses by the same margin. We lost to the best offenses and the worst offenses by the same margin.
Swap Texas Tech for Wisconsin - we still lose. Swap Oklahoma State for Purdue - we still lose. Swap Texas for Illinois - we still lose. Swap Kansas for Rutgers - we still lose. Swap Kansas State for Michigan - we still lose. Swap TCU for tOSU - we still lose. Swap West Virginia for Northwestern - we still win.
We lost because of our offensive strategy and decision making, and that wouldn’t change (as proven through 8 conference games) based on our opponent. We lost because we’re in the bottom 1% of all college football for points per yard gained. We lost because our special teams is too special.
No. Then it would just create a level of Hok arrogance (assuming it would be Iowa) heading into next season that would be insufferable and even more nauseating than usual because they wouuld end on a huge win streak.Justice would be served if the B1G West wins the B1G Championship game. Would say volumes about the B1G and put the CFP committee into a lather.
Feels like you’re giving some of those west teams a little too much credit with those comparisons but the fact remains that if you go 1 of 5 in the red zone or turn the ball over 5 times you would be lucky to beat Coe College.
Be interesting to see if Case IH still wants to be a sponsor next year.You would think ISU handles like NW and Purdue but then again you would think they'd have scored pretty easily on KU, OSU, Tech, etc.
They're such a baffling team that it's hard to feel confident in a lot of match ups.
So...same as usual?No. Then it would just create a level of Hok arrogance (assuming it would be Iowa) heading into next season that would be insufferable and even more nauseating than usual because they wouuld end on a huge win streak.
I totally agree that our defense would dominate the entire Big 10 West. But our defense has pretty much dominated the entire Big 12, and we have a single win, so.....Minnesota was 1 of 8 in the second half for passing against Iowa. All they can do is run the ball. We would bury that offense. Wisconsin is not good.
No. Then it would just create a level of Hok arrogance (assuming it would be Iowa) heading into next season that would be insufferable and even more nauseating than usual because they wouuld end on a huge win streak.
Yep, it's largely the "find ways to lose regardless of opponent" aspect that keeps me from declaring ISU would be something like 7-4 right now vs. Iowa's schedule.You would think ISU handles like NW and Purdue but then again you would think they'd have scored pretty easily on KU, OSU, Tech, etc.
They're such a baffling team that it's hard to feel confident in a lot of match ups.