Because he wasn't Iowa's starter will be his response. So Wadley can't be any good if he didn't start over Daniels.....How will losing Daniels really hurt the Iowa offense? The more carries for Wadley might be for the better.
Because he wasn't Iowa's starter will be his response. So Wadley can't be any good if he didn't start over Daniels.....How will losing Daniels really hurt the Iowa offense? The more carries for Wadley might be for the better.
How will losing Daniels really hurt the Iowa offense? The more carries for Wadley might be for the better.
And Jaleel was 1st team by coaches and 2nd by media. Jewell was 2nd team by both.
Jewell was also one of five finalists for the Butkus Award, which goes to the nations top LB. He was the only one of the five finalists to play in the B1G.
Because he wasn't Iowa's starter will be his response. So Wadley can't be any good if he didn't start over Daniels.....
I don't usually troll, but it's way too easy with the Hawkeye fans here.
I didn't ask you to formulate a gameplan for Wyoming. I told you to worry about Wyoming. Kirk has shown he is capable of losing to MAC teams, and now even FCS teams, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Wyoming get a victory in Iowa City. They have an NFL QB and a good coach - a bad combo for the Hawks.
No doubt, it's a good thing we didn't lose our best RB.Losing your best RB and QB is going to hurt whether you want to admit it or not. That's all I'm saying
No doubt, it's a good thing we didn't lose our best RB.
Daniels was your best RB and that's why he was your starter. Going to be tough to replace him but luckily you won't play in a league that plays defense
Daniels was your best RB and that's why he was your starter. Going to be tough to replace him but luckily you won't play in a league that plays defense
You think this is a troll? We have lost to ISU 5 times in the last 14 years, So I totally understand Kirk can lose to a MAC or FCS level team.
This is a stretch.We are loaded at RB, so this won't be a problem. We lost a 1000 yard rusher and we will replace him with a 1000 yard rusher.
We are loaded at RB, so this won't be a problem. We lost a 1000 yard rusher and we will replace him with a 1000 yard rusher.
Oh Gonzo
Lol no. Must be nice to play in a defensive optional league though!
The starting RB who ran for over 1000 yards will most certainly be replace by a guy who will run for over 1000 yards.
Your "defensive optional league troll" is as bad as your "Jok is a mid major" troll. Weak all the way around.
And you're still really bad at evaluating talentThe Big Ten is a defensive optional conference or at least it was last year. I guess we can agree to disagree that losing your starting RB, QB and two best defensive players will hurt you guys a lot
I have heard Vandenberg may not play a down this year. He needs surgery again.They won 8 games with an easier schedule and likely a better QB than they will have this year (not a knock on the young QB, he's just very inexperienced).
Vandeberg is a nice player but they need another guy to emerge as a threat also.
CJB was one of the best quarterbacks to ever play at Iowa. Stanley is not CJB nor is he better.CJB was not very good at all last year. He had little to zero pocket presence and hardly ever ran. I just don't see how we can be much worse at the QB position as last year quite frankly. I see Stanley making more things happen combined with more mistakes.