RECRUITING: Sterling Galban commits

dinger

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 20, 2006
4,113
706
113
Plano, TX
Whoa 10.69 wouldn't have made the 4x100 team on my HS team in central Nebraska. Shocks me that bronze in Texas is that high.
 

dinger

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 20, 2006
4,113
706
113
Plano, TX
I hate to say this, but you are a liar. Lol
I hate to say it but you're wrong. I didn't remember exact splits so I tried to find it. Their time at state was 41.91. That's a sub 10.5 split average.

http://nsaahome.org/textfile/track/abres00.htm#AB13

Districts they were a bit faster than that. I want to say 41.79.

To answer sarcastic question #2, correct none broke the state record that year in the actual 100, which was higher than 10.41 at the time.

Hope your crow is tasty.
 

mdk2isu

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
4,944
3,966
113
Not of this World
I hate to say it but you're wrong. I didn't remember exact splits so I tried to find it. Their time at state was 41.91. That's a sub 10.5 split average.

http://nsaahome.org/textfile/track/abres00.htm#AB13

Districts they were a bit faster than that. I want to say 41.79.

To answer sarcastic question #2, correct none broke the state record that year in the actual 100, which was higher than 10.41 at the time.

Hope your crow is tasty.

A 4x100 relay split =/= 100m dash. 3 out of 4 runners in the 4x100 have a running start. They should run a faster time than a straight 100m dash runner coming out of the blocks.
 

cycart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 2, 2012
405
527
93
Johnston, IA
I hate to say it but you're wrong. I didn't remember exact splits so I tried to find it. Their time at state was 41.91. That's a sub 10.5 split average.

http://nsaahome.org/textfile/track/abres00.htm#AB13

Districts they were a bit faster than that. I want to say 41.79.

To answer sarcastic question #2, correct none broke the state record that year in the actual 100, which was higher than 10.41 at the time.

Hope your crow is tasty.
Taking splits from a 4x100 isn't really a good way to judge someone's 100 meter time. Each leg besides the first runner starts there split at a run already as opposed to the blocks. This should result in a faster time since they are already near top speed and also it's hard to judge how far they actually run. Usually, the fastest runner runs closer to 110 meters due to the exchange zone, so the person running the shorter distance will obviously have a very good split.
 

rob05

Active Member
Apr 14, 2006
135
86
28
Ankeny
I hate to say it but you're wrong. I didn't remember exact splits so I tried to find it. Their time at state was 41.91. That's a sub 10.5 split average.

http://nsaahome.org/textfile/track/abres00.htm#AB13

Districts they were a bit faster than that. I want to say 41.79.

To answer sarcastic question #2, correct none broke the state record that year in the actual 100, which was higher than 10.41 at the time.

Hope your crow is tasty.


You are comparing splits with starting blocks...I'd hope the guy who has a running start could beat a guy getting out of blocks.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isufbcurt

dinger

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 20, 2006
4,113
706
113
Plano, TX
Taking splits from a 4x100 isn't really a good way to judge someone's 100 meter time. Each leg besides the first runner starts there split at a run already as opposed to the blocks. This should result in a faster time since they are already near top speed and also it's hard to judge how far they actually run. Usually, the fastest runner runs closer to 110 meters due to the exchange zone, so the person running the shorter distance will obviously have a very good split.
I agree totally. That wasn't the point I made. In fact the only point I am making now is that I wasnt lying. And provided the link to prove it.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: isutrevman

TheJackWePack5

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2011
10,092
9,321
113
Ankeny, IA.
I hate to say it but you're wrong. I didn't remember exact splits so I tried to find it. Their time at state was 41.91. That's a sub 10.5 split average.

http://nsaahome.org/textfile/track/abres00.htm#AB13

Districts they were a bit faster than that. I want to say 41.79.

To answer sarcastic question #2, correct none broke the state record that year in the actual 100, which was higher than 10.41 at the time.

Hope your crow is tasty.
10.6 would have placed Sterling in the top 5 in Class A in Nebraska. Your high school had the 4 fastest guys in the state? Impressive!

You are wrong. See message below.


A 4x100 relay split =/= 100m dash. 3 out of 4 runners in the 4x100 have a running start. They should run a faster time than a straight 100m dash runner coming out of the blocks.

Correct. For example, we didn't have a single runner who could break 11.5 in the 100m dash in high school, but we ran sub 45 (or an 11.25 average) in the 4x100. Not the same at all.

Example: Epworth WD won the 4x1 in Iowa this year with a time of 42.00. One of the runners on that team was 6th in the 100m finals running 11.31.

Sorry fella, I'm not eating any crow.

Edit: I'm sure Sterling could hit the 10.5 range in a 4x1 split.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman

cyclonedave25

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 10, 2007
21,240
10,672
113
Chicago, IL
I hate to say it but you're wrong. I didn't remember exact splits so I tried to find it. Their time at state was 41.91. That's a sub 10.5 split average.

http://nsaahome.org/textfile/track/abres00.htm#AB13

Districts they were a bit faster than that. I want to say 41.79.

To answer sarcastic question #2, correct none broke the state record that year in the actual 100, which was higher than 10.41 at the time.

Hope your crow is tasty.
A general rule of thumb to get a ballpark idea of converting 4x100m split times to average individual 100m times is to add 2 seconds to the 4x100 time and divide by 4.
So 41.91 + 2 = 43.91
43.91/4 = 10.98 average
(And I'm assuming that 41.91 time was FAT. If it was hand timed, you are looking at avg 100m times of around 11.04)

Still pretty fast for a midwest HS team to have 4 sprinters run around 10.9-11.00.

But, 10.69 FAT is pretty fast for a HS athlete.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: aauummm

dinger

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 20, 2006
4,113
706
113
Plano, TX
Holy ****, enough with the dog pile. This site is ridiculous sometimes and unforgiving always.

Ok yes I was comparing 41.91 divided by 4 to 10.69. Yes 10.69 wouldve been on my HS 4x100 team.

MY ACTUAL POINT AND WHAT I SHOULDVE JUST SAID WAS...Im surprised that 10.69 (even out of the blocks in a 100m race) is worthy of 3rd place in Texas.
 
Last edited:

danielyp29

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2011
771
553
93
Ames
Holy ******* ****, enough with the dog pile. This site is ridiculous sometimes and unforgiving always.

Ok yes I was comparing 41.91 divided by 4 to 10.69. Yes 10.69 wouldve been on my HS 4x100 team.

MY ACTUAL POINT AND WHAT I SHOULDVE JUST SAID WAS...Im surprised that 10.69 (even out of the blocks in a 100m race) is worthy of 3rd place in Texas.
couldn't wind be a factor? running with head wind vs tail wind can make a pretty significant difference in the 100
 

cyclonespiker33

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jan 19, 2011
14,757
7,971
113
Just say you were wrong and move on. The guy is fast. You don't know what the conditions were that day, or a lot of other things.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

TheJackWePack5

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2011
10,092
9,321
113
Ankeny, IA.
Holy ****, enough with the dog pile. This site is ridiculous sometimes and unforgiving always.

Ok yes I was comparing 41.91 divided by 4 to 10.69. Yes 10.69 wouldve been on my HS 4x100 team.

MY ACTUAL POINT AND WHAT I SHOULDVE JUST SAID WAS...Im surprised that 10.69 (even out of the blocks in a 100m race) is worthy of 3rd place in Texas.
I think it was 3rd place in 4A though, right? I'm sure there were some good times in 5A and 6A.

That said, the two guys that went 1st and 2nd in 4A (ahead of Galban) ran 10.22(!!) and 10.34(!). Those dudes can fly.

Edit: Sterling would have been 7th in 5A, and also 7th in 6A. So that's 14 dudes who are faster than 10.69 in Texas high school track. Wow!!

He would have had the fastest time at the Iowa State Track Meet. Even faster than Trousil, who can fly.
 
Last edited: