So If you were starting a team you would take Ben over Peyton?
So basically we're wasting our time here.No, why would I. Just because I think someone is clearly a lot better than Sage doesn't mean I think he's the best in the NFL.
So basically we're wasting our time here.
Not once did I say Sage was "better" that Ben. And I doubt it's 99.9%. Outside of Pennsylvania and Ohio you'd be hard pressed to find someone who holds Ben in such high regards.Why, because I and 99.9% of the free world doesn't think Sage is better than Big Ben means we have to think Big Ben is better than Manning?
Outside of Pennsylvania and Ohio you'd be hard pressed to find someone who holds Ben in such high regards.
Don't bring them into this mess.Like all of the media, fan voters, and NFL personnel? He did get voted to the Pro Bowl this year.
Not once did I say Sage was "better" that Ben. And I doubt it's 99.9%. Outside of Pennsylvania and Ohio you'd be hard pressed to find someone who holds Ben in such high regards.
Ben is average. Sage is average. There is the top 10%, the middle 80%,and the bottom 10%. They are both in the middle 80%.Sorry, "easily as good." And yes, the vast majority of objective football fans hold Big Ben in WAY, WAY higher regard than Sage, I actually hate the Steelers and would root against them against about anyone other than the Colts.
Where has he been hiding
IMO he throws too many interceptions.
Wow, you sure are making some awesome points. Last I checked Big Ben had 1 superbowl ring in 2 full years of play, is the second ranked passer in the NFL this season, the only QB in NFL history to win the super bowl his rookie year, the first QB ever to lead his team to the conference championship game in his first two seasons, has more regular season and playoff wins at this stage of his career than any quarterback in NFL history.
But like you said Sage is "no doubt, easily as good," because lets face it, numbers and wins and rings "don't mean much."