It's easy to argue that if you give him our OL that he wouldn't be having a good year because there's no way to either confirm or dispute it.
I think we can all agree that we'd have a better running game than we do if we had him.
And I watched our linebackers miss tackles on him in Iowa City. It's hard to predict where he'll be drafted because we don't know who else will be leaving early or what kind of combine numbers he's going to put up, but I was impressed with how fast he looked against Wisconsin.
Oh - I think I can say with much certainty that if he played behind our line, he wouldn't have the same numbers. :wink:
Just as if we put ARob or Bass behind iowa's line, I think we can reasonably expect their numbers to jump.
It goes without saying that he would be a plus to our running game. But really for the same reasons. He's difficult to take down alone. Our backs aren't. Far too often our backs go down nearly on their own. Chizik even said as much prior to the Baylor game.
I'm just saying that like most iowa offensive skill players (Betts, Banks, etc) Greene's success is LARGELY due to the line iowa puts up there.
I have no idea on his pro prospects. Again, the next two weeks will tell the story. He's played nobody to this point.
(yes - I'm semi-ignoring the notion that he shed our tacklers. EVERYBODY sheds out tacklers)