This isn't A is greater than B, B is greater than C, so A is greater than C. I think if Parker can control the match he can beat anyone like he did with DeSanto. But he can also get in some bad positions and has been stuck pretty easily. Are we supposed to forget those results as well?
I think from a talent standpoint I still like Simmons. He is the better athlete and has a really high ceiling. Parker has more tools, especially on top, and appears to have a gas tank for days. This may be a situational weight the next few weeks.
I'm more concerned about which wrestler can qualify the weight for NCAA's. I don't disagree that Simmons may be more talented, but Parker's big wins over Desanto and Naser would go a long way towards earning a qualifying spot for the conference tournament and would go a long ways toward a wild card bid to NCAAs if he needed it.