With coaching changes the first couple games are typically sketchy. Starting 0-2 would be unbearable, due to who the games are against, but really only an indication the players are learning a new system. Given our history, how does anyone overlook the purple Hawks in this scenario. A win in game one would be an indicator that Campbell staff is as good as it looks.
One of the things I like about Campbell is that he has been the new head coach before. Hoping that with the experience of taking over a program before he can avoid some of the issues ISU has seen with hiring asst. coaches to their first head coaching jobs.
That is nice advantage versus no head coaching experience. There will still be some new experiences. Taking over an unfamiliar program that needs a change is different than taking over an established program you are familiar with. It's good Campbell's crew seems to know what change is needed.One of the things I like about Campbell is that he has been the new head coach before. Hoping that with the experience of taking over a program before he can avoid some of the issues ISU has seen with hiring asst. coaches to their first head coaching jobs.
I didn't hear the podcast but 2-5 sounds right to me. I would probably had said 3 to 5 myself. It may be because he's a reporter, not a fan, and isn't as biased as we are.Bobby LaGesse said in his podcast 2-5 wins. Is it just me or does anybody else find him overly pessimistic? I think he's about the only ISU writer I don't follow on Twitter.
I don't even know what to think. I have a couple different directions.
One direction is that there is so little talent currently on the team that no matter how good CMC is, that 4 wins is the ceiling with the talent that CPR left here.
The other direction is we have several games against bad teams that how can we NOT get to 4 wins with a capable coach no matter how poor the talent is? I mean UNI, and San Jose St., those are games that should be won by the 2nd team players. Kansas is almost as bad as UNI and San Jose St.. Basically then if CMC can beat the awful teams on the schedule that is a minimum of 3 wins, and then if he can beat the average teams then he could get up to 8 wins as Tech, K-State, Texas, WVU and Iowa are pretty avg. teams.
Basically I'm saying I don't have any clue what CMC is gonna be able to do with this team.
One direction is that there is so little talent currently on the team that no matter how good CMC is, that 4 wins is the ceiling with the talent that CPR left here.
I'm not at all saying Paul was a good recruiter or developer of talent, but I'd hardly say the cupboards are bare. Warren in the backfield, Lazard-Wesley-Daley-West + at WR, OL is the most unknown but Campos is at least solid, DL has TUCKER, Aka, Thomas +, Harris is a leader at LB, and there are some solid pieces at DB in Cotton-Moya, Tribune & Wiltz.
I will be content if we win 4, happy if we win 5, & ecstatic if we win more than that.
I'm also one who thinks we get K State this year. Not because they're down necessarily, but we've been within a score of them for 5 out of the last 6 meetings, sometimes in heartbreaking fashion. It's not unreasonable IMO to think a couple bounces our way could result in the W.
The Orlando Sentinel is a rag, so take it for what it's worth. But #114 will probably be pretty accurate considering the meathead coaching the team.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/spor...ootball-no-114-iowa-state-20160503-story.html
The Orlando Sentinel is a rag, so take it for what it's worth. But #114 will probably be pretty accurate considering the meathead coaching the team.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/spor...ootball-no-114-iowa-state-20160503-story.html
This is P5 football, you need about a dozen more players on your list and then you need way better backups to the starters than ISU has. That is how you compete with good/decent teams, you build depth by having talent up and down your roster. I'm not saying that you have 4* talent up and down the roster, but you do want guys that fellow P5 schools at least offered.
CMC is off to a good start brining in talent, but there is a LONG ways to go. I never understood the people who say that the roster had enough "talent" over the last 3 years, and that CPR just couldn't coach. The fact is CPR could coach, and did great with the more talented CGC recruits. He just never did bring in enough talent to compete in the Big12, and that is why he won 8 games over the last 3 years.