Bikers on Roads

Incyte

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2007
4,956
931
83
Wasn't there a big movement several years ago to link up a bunch of central Iowa cities with bike trails? Maybe I'm imagining things. I thought the plan was to use old rail easements.
 

LindenCy

Kevin Dresser Fan Club
Staff member
Mar 19, 2006
32,371
4,092
113
Chicago, IL
Problem is for every 1000 bikers, 10 will act like jack-offs (and proly drunk or drinking) and act like imbiciles. And for every 1000 motorist who have to pass a group of bikers - about 10 will go into road-rage and jack with the bikers.

This is really the truth. And considering how many bikes are on the road, it seems there really are very few accidents.
 

DaddyMac

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
14,070
453
83
Wasn't there a big movement several years ago to link up a bunch of central Iowa cities with bike trails? Maybe I'm imagining things. I thought the plan was to use old rail easements.

Yeah - they're getting there. But it's a slow, slow process and many have been delayed. You may be surprised to find out how many of those trails got trashed and were closed last summer due to the floods as well. Great Western was shut down most of last summer as were many parts of the birdland area trails and even Raccoon River out west.

It kind of adds to that point however. Some of these trails run on highways as "connectors" themselves. Can't think of the number, but the highway that runs out of Slater towards Ames is one of those trails.

And trails don't go everywhere or serve everyone. Particularly when you're talking rural.
 

Tornado man

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2007
11,913
-539
113
63
Ames, IA
Wasn't there a big movement several years ago to link up a bunch of central Iowa cities with bike trails? Maybe I'm imagining things. I thought the plan was to use old rail easements.

A lot of us ride bikes for a work out, for aerobic conditioning. You can't get up to a decent speed (and heart rate) on most trails, as they are intended more for leisure riding.
 

taco2000

Member
Apr 20, 2006
73
0
6
Wow, way to throw blame when I am trying to show there are 2 sides to it. It is also illegal to run stop signs, but I see almost every bike here in Chicago do it. When one of them gets hit, they will blame the car.

Cars should avoid bikes, no doubt, but at least in Chicago, I have very rarely seen a car do anything to a bike, but have seen many bikes break the law.

Who did I blame? I pointed out what you call "jerk behavior" is illegal.
It's seems to me your two sides are not equal. Get on a bike and ride up and down Clark from Division to, oh say Foster, and tell me that you rarely see cars "do" anything to bikes.
 

DaddyMac

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
14,070
453
83
A lot of us ride bikes for a work out, for aerobic conditioning. You can't get up to a decent speed (and heart rate) on most trails, as they are intended more for leisure riding.

More dangerous too. I wasn't kidding earlier about animals on trails. Seen a ton of accidents due to them. Whatever it is that attracts deer to roads and cars, they apparently find trails and bikes the same way.

And they aren't maintained like roads are. Anyone who has been on the Great Western south of Cumming can speak to that.
 

SplitIdentity

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2007
11,486
3,073
113
Minnesota
Yeah - they're getting there. But it's a slow, slow process and many have been delayed. You may be surprised to find out how many of those trails got trashed and were closed last summer due to the floods as well. Great Western was shut down most of last summer as were many parts of the birdland area trails and even Raccoon River out west.

It kind of adds to that point however. Some of these trails run on highways as "connectors" themselves. Can't think of the number, but the highway that runs out of Slater towards Ames is one of those trails.

And trails don't go everywhere or serve everyone. Particularly when you're talking rural.

You're thinking South Dakota street heading into Slater.
 

jmb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
20,994
10,524
113
How about a new one from my past Sunday?

I was out for a Sunday drive. I like roads with hills and curves. A gravel road met the country road right in the turn and a lot of rocks were thrown on the road. I almost lost control of my car in turn because of that.

The people driving from the gravel road to the country road didn't intend to hurt cars. If I had lost control it wouldn't be my fault or the gravel road drivers. Just bad road conditions.

So now I have to decide if I still want to take my Sunday drives on those roads. They are not as safe.

For the record I actually used to ride bikes on country roads. It's not safe. I don't do it anymore. I don't like trails so I just don't ride.

I'd also love to ride a street bike, as in motorcycle, I don't own one because it's just not safe; that's the only reason.
not sure how it is better analogy, but it sure does prove not everyone should be driving a car.
 

LindenCy

Kevin Dresser Fan Club
Staff member
Mar 19, 2006
32,371
4,092
113
Chicago, IL
Who did I blame? I pointed out what you call "jerk behavior" is illegal.
It's seems to me your two sides are not equal. Get on a bike and ride up and down Clark from Division to, oh say Foster, and tell me that you rarely see cars "do" anything to bikes.


I'll drop it, but I just hate to see anyone, car or bike causing an accident and people getting hurt.
 
Last edited:

Tornado man

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2007
11,913
-539
113
63
Ames, IA
I'd also love to ride a street bike, as in motorcycle, I don't own one because it's just not safe; that's the only reason.

I remember buying my new motorcycle in college - so excited!
Then after about a dozen near-accidents from drivers simply not seeing me (lots of left turns right in front of me), I sold it two months later.
 

Colorado

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2008
2,472
1,316
113
Colorado
This thread is laughable. The people arguing against bikes on the road have very little idea of what the rules of the road are for bikes. They don't where bikes can legally ride. They think that because the bikers are taking a risk it's okay if they get hurt. They don't think that bike riders are licensed motor vehicle drivers or pay taxes.

Let's face it. Bikes belong on the road. They will continue to be on the road until there is a rideable shoulder or bike lane for them. If there is a safer alternative, more often than not, the biker will take the safer route. The biggest issue is the people driving down these rural roads not expecting to see bike riders and when they do encounter them they can become enraged by the few seconds of time that the bikers have caused them to lose. If you see bike riders, even riding side-by-side, slow down and pass them when it's safe to do so. Sure, you lose a few seconds of your precious time getting to where you're going but you're not in jail and the cyclist isn't in the hospital. Have some courtesy for your fellow man and woman. Someone already mentioned that we all have a moral responsibility to not cause harm.
 

alaskaguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
10,203
220
63
Regarding rural settings, IMHO our rural roads were not constructed for recreational activities. If your impeding traffic, stop and let people pass. I really dont' think recreational activities should be holding up commercial activity. I would suggest lobbying for rural back paths.
Not all bicycle excursions are "recreational activities." For example, I rode my bicycle from my house (I live next to a county road) into town to go to work. I might add that the county roads in this area are quite hilly, far more so than what I remember of Iowa county roads. In this particular area there are many others that commute by bicyle, and fortunately the motor vehiclists are far more understanding than many of those that are posting on this board of our rights to do so.

I will add that not all motor vehicle traffic is "commerical. Undoubtedly some motor vehicle traffic is "recreational" in its nature.

So now what determines whether one should be able to use the rural roads is not the type of vehicle but the intent of the driver? It would be very difficult to enforce this standard.
 
Last edited:

LindenCy

Kevin Dresser Fan Club
Staff member
Mar 19, 2006
32,371
4,092
113
Chicago, IL
Let's face it. Bikes belong on the road. They will continue to be on the road until there is a rideable shoulder or bike lane for them. If there is a safer alternative, more often than not, the biker will take the safer route. The biggest issue is the people driving down these rural roads not expecting to see bike riders and when they do encounter them they can become enraged by the few seconds of time that the bikers have caused them to lose. If you see bike riders, even riding side-by-side, slow down and pass them when it's safe to do so. Sure, you lose a few seconds of your precious time getting to where you're going but you're not in jail and the cyclist isn't in the hospital. Have some courtesy for your fellow man and woman. Someone already mentioned that we all have a moral responsibility to not cause harm.

Thanks. This is actually a reasonable post. I don't want to see anyone hurt, which is part of the reason I feel passionate about all parties obeying the rules of the road.
 

alaskaguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
10,203
220
63
This thread is laughable. The people arguing against bikes on the road have very little idea of what the rules of the road are for bikes. They don't where bikes can legally ride. They think that because the bikers are taking a risk it's okay if they get hurt. They don't think that bike riders are licensed motor vehicle drivers or pay taxes.

Let's face it. Bikes belong on the road. They will continue to be on the road until there is a rideable shoulder or bike lane for them. If there is a safer alternative, more often than not, the biker will take the safer route. The biggest issue is the people driving down these rural roads not expecting to see bike riders and when they do encounter them they can become enraged by the few seconds of time that the bikers have caused them to lose. If you see bike riders, even riding side-by-side, slow down and pass them when it's safe to do so. Sure, you lose a few seconds of your precious time getting to where you're going but you're not in jail and the cyclist isn't in the hospital. Have some courtesy for your fellow man and woman. Someone already mentioned that we all have a moral responsibility to not cause harm.
+1
 

Ames

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 5, 2006
2,160
251
83
not sure how it is better analogy, but it sure does prove not everyone should be driving a car.
It's pretty simple. Road conditions can be bad for cars or bikes. Wrong or right if you bike on a hilly and curvy country road it's not as safe as riding on a trail. You as a biker have to decide if it's worth the risk. Personally I gave it up.

As to my driving ability I don't see how you can make a judgment call on that; but it seems that you are pretty good at passing judgment.
 

jmb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
20,994
10,524
113
It's pretty simple. Road conditions can be bad for cars or bikes. Wrong or right if you bike on a hilly and curvy country road it's not as safe as riding on a trail. You as a biker have to decide if it's worth the risk. Personally I gave it up.

As to my driving ability I don't see how you can make a judgment call on that; but it seems that you are pretty good at passing judgment.
made no judgement-you admitted you can't control your car. it sounds like either you exceeded your capacity once you left the comfort of paved road...or you were driving to fast for your skill set/conditions. either way you have demonstrated via admission that you have some challenges driving. furthermore; maybe you could post on bikeiowa.com when you are heading out(along with route) so bicyclists can take extra care. :wink:
 
  • Like
Reactions: clones_jer

CYKOFAN

Well-Known Member
Mar 27, 2006
4,947
120
63
I used to ride the Saylorville trails until they became unridable the last couple of years due to lack of maintenance. That's why I did a lot of riding on rural paved roads, and I would stay as far to the right as possible. Most people would swing wide when they pass, but a few would still pass close enough to give me a scare, even though there was no oncoming traffic. Those are the jerks you read about that hit bikers then leave the scene. I thought they said on the news that the driver ran over the biker and left the scene in the recent incident. Pretty hard not to know you hit a biker, even if it's lightly.
 

Cy Heavy

Active Member
Aug 29, 2006
1,127
15
38
Ankeny
This thread is laughable. The people arguing against bikes on the road have very little idea of what the rules of the road are for bikes. They don't where bikes can legally ride. They think that because the bikers are taking a risk it's okay if they get hurt. They don't think that bike riders are licensed motor vehicle drivers or pay taxes.

Let's face it. Bikes belong on the road. They will continue to be on the road until there is a rideable shoulder or bike lane for them. If there is a safer alternative, more often than not, the biker will take the safer route. The biggest issue is the people driving down these rural roads not expecting to see bike riders and when they do encounter them they can become enraged by the few seconds of time that the bikers have caused them to lose. If you see bike riders, even riding side-by-side, slow down and pass them when it's safe to do so. Sure, you lose a few seconds of your precious time getting to where you're going but you're not in jail and the cyclist isn't in the hospital. Have some courtesy for your fellow man and woman. Someone already mentioned that we all have a moral responsibility to not cause harm.

Very well said.
 

Clonegrad07

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2008
2,463
109
63
North Carolina
This thread is ridiculous... I can't believe how many people are saying "They're taking a risk... it's their own fault." What's the number one rule you learn in drivers ed? Look and think before you act. I know if you're paying attention and looking ahead, you should NEVER hit a biker... EVER.
 

Ames

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 5, 2006
2,160
251
83
made no judgement-you admitted you can't control your car. it sounds like either you exceeded your capacity once you left the comfort of paved road...or you were driving to fast for your skill set/conditions. either way you have demonstrated via admission that you have some challenges driving. furthermore; maybe you could post on bikeiowa.com when you are heading out(along with route) so bicyclists can take extra care. :wink:
I never left the paved road. Rocks from the gravel road were thrown up onto the paved road. It was like driving on marbles. Why a gravel road meets a paved road right on a turn I have no idea.

I actually grew up a farm boy so driving down the gravel road is no problem and in general I'd say I'm above average in the driving department.