Problem is for every 1000 bikers, 10 will act like jack-offs (and proly drunk or drinking) and act like imbiciles. And for every 1000 motorist who have to pass a group of bikers - about 10 will go into road-rage and jack with the bikers.
Wasn't there a big movement several years ago to link up a bunch of central Iowa cities with bike trails? Maybe I'm imagining things. I thought the plan was to use old rail easements.
Wasn't there a big movement several years ago to link up a bunch of central Iowa cities with bike trails? Maybe I'm imagining things. I thought the plan was to use old rail easements.
Wow, way to throw blame when I am trying to show there are 2 sides to it. It is also illegal to run stop signs, but I see almost every bike here in Chicago do it. When one of them gets hit, they will blame the car.
Cars should avoid bikes, no doubt, but at least in Chicago, I have very rarely seen a car do anything to a bike, but have seen many bikes break the law.
A lot of us ride bikes for a work out, for aerobic conditioning. You can't get up to a decent speed (and heart rate) on most trails, as they are intended more for leisure riding.
Yeah - they're getting there. But it's a slow, slow process and many have been delayed. You may be surprised to find out how many of those trails got trashed and were closed last summer due to the floods as well. Great Western was shut down most of last summer as were many parts of the birdland area trails and even Raccoon River out west.
It kind of adds to that point however. Some of these trails run on highways as "connectors" themselves. Can't think of the number, but the highway that runs out of Slater towards Ames is one of those trails.
And trails don't go everywhere or serve everyone. Particularly when you're talking rural.
not sure how it is better analogy, but it sure does prove not everyone should be driving a car.How about a new one from my past Sunday?
I was out for a Sunday drive. I like roads with hills and curves. A gravel road met the country road right in the turn and a lot of rocks were thrown on the road. I almost lost control of my car in turn because of that.
The people driving from the gravel road to the country road didn't intend to hurt cars. If I had lost control it wouldn't be my fault or the gravel road drivers. Just bad road conditions.
So now I have to decide if I still want to take my Sunday drives on those roads. They are not as safe.
For the record I actually used to ride bikes on country roads. It's not safe. I don't do it anymore. I don't like trails so I just don't ride.
I'd also love to ride a street bike, as in motorcycle, I don't own one because it's just not safe; that's the only reason.
Who did I blame? I pointed out what you call "jerk behavior" is illegal.
It's seems to me your two sides are not equal. Get on a bike and ride up and down Clark from Division to, oh say Foster, and tell me that you rarely see cars "do" anything to bikes.
I'd also love to ride a street bike, as in motorcycle, I don't own one because it's just not safe; that's the only reason.
Not all bicycle excursions are "recreational activities." For example, I rode my bicycle from my house (I live next to a county road) into town to go to work. I might add that the county roads in this area are quite hilly, far more so than what I remember of Iowa county roads. In this particular area there are many others that commute by bicyle, and fortunately the motor vehiclists are far more understanding than many of those that are posting on this board of our rights to do so.Regarding rural settings, IMHO our rural roads were not constructed for recreational activities. If your impeding traffic, stop and let people pass. I really dont' think recreational activities should be holding up commercial activity. I would suggest lobbying for rural back paths.
Let's face it. Bikes belong on the road. They will continue to be on the road until there is a rideable shoulder or bike lane for them. If there is a safer alternative, more often than not, the biker will take the safer route. The biggest issue is the people driving down these rural roads not expecting to see bike riders and when they do encounter them they can become enraged by the few seconds of time that the bikers have caused them to lose. If you see bike riders, even riding side-by-side, slow down and pass them when it's safe to do so. Sure, you lose a few seconds of your precious time getting to where you're going but you're not in jail and the cyclist isn't in the hospital. Have some courtesy for your fellow man and woman. Someone already mentioned that we all have a moral responsibility to not cause harm.
+1This thread is laughable. The people arguing against bikes on the road have very little idea of what the rules of the road are for bikes. They don't where bikes can legally ride. They think that because the bikers are taking a risk it's okay if they get hurt. They don't think that bike riders are licensed motor vehicle drivers or pay taxes.
Let's face it. Bikes belong on the road. They will continue to be on the road until there is a rideable shoulder or bike lane for them. If there is a safer alternative, more often than not, the biker will take the safer route. The biggest issue is the people driving down these rural roads not expecting to see bike riders and when they do encounter them they can become enraged by the few seconds of time that the bikers have caused them to lose. If you see bike riders, even riding side-by-side, slow down and pass them when it's safe to do so. Sure, you lose a few seconds of your precious time getting to where you're going but you're not in jail and the cyclist isn't in the hospital. Have some courtesy for your fellow man and woman. Someone already mentioned that we all have a moral responsibility to not cause harm.
It's pretty simple. Road conditions can be bad for cars or bikes. Wrong or right if you bike on a hilly and curvy country road it's not as safe as riding on a trail. You as a biker have to decide if it's worth the risk. Personally I gave it up.not sure how it is better analogy, but it sure does prove not everyone should be driving a car.
made no judgement-you admitted you can't control your car. it sounds like either you exceeded your capacity once you left the comfort of paved road...or you were driving to fast for your skill set/conditions. either way you have demonstrated via admission that you have some challenges driving. furthermore; maybe you could post on bikeiowa.com when you are heading out(along with route) so bicyclists can take extra care. :wink:It's pretty simple. Road conditions can be bad for cars or bikes. Wrong or right if you bike on a hilly and curvy country road it's not as safe as riding on a trail. You as a biker have to decide if it's worth the risk. Personally I gave it up.
As to my driving ability I don't see how you can make a judgment call on that; but it seems that you are pretty good at passing judgment.
This thread is laughable. The people arguing against bikes on the road have very little idea of what the rules of the road are for bikes. They don't where bikes can legally ride. They think that because the bikers are taking a risk it's okay if they get hurt. They don't think that bike riders are licensed motor vehicle drivers or pay taxes.
Let's face it. Bikes belong on the road. They will continue to be on the road until there is a rideable shoulder or bike lane for them. If there is a safer alternative, more often than not, the biker will take the safer route. The biggest issue is the people driving down these rural roads not expecting to see bike riders and when they do encounter them they can become enraged by the few seconds of time that the bikers have caused them to lose. If you see bike riders, even riding side-by-side, slow down and pass them when it's safe to do so. Sure, you lose a few seconds of your precious time getting to where you're going but you're not in jail and the cyclist isn't in the hospital. Have some courtesy for your fellow man and woman. Someone already mentioned that we all have a moral responsibility to not cause harm.
I never left the paved road. Rocks from the gravel road were thrown up onto the paved road. It was like driving on marbles. Why a gravel road meets a paved road right on a turn I have no idea.made no judgement-you admitted you can't control your car. it sounds like either you exceeded your capacity once you left the comfort of paved road...or you were driving to fast for your skill set/conditions. either way you have demonstrated via admission that you have some challenges driving. furthermore; maybe you could post on bikeiowa.com when you are heading out(along with route) so bicyclists can take extra care. :wink: