Good one!!:yes: applauseLOL. This "investment" you are talking about is SPORTS; it's entertainment. Total apples and oranges - nice try though.
Good one!!:yes: applauseLOL. This "investment" you are talking about is SPORTS; it's entertainment. Total apples and oranges - nice try though.
The guy has been "lost" for some time! He is a student at Marquette University. Not much to lose there:yes: for ISU!A guy in JP's position is charged with building the donor list. His "response" looks very petty/unprofessional and does nothing to encourage the writer to help change the situation by becoming an investor in the program. If he wanted to shine a light on the guy's lack of donations, he could have done it in a more positive way and actually given the guy a few reasons why he should donate. Instead, he gave the guy both barrels.
JP's response probably made JP feel pretty good, but now the guy is lost forever. If JP gets a bug up his arse every time a non-donor sends a note in, well, that's not going to be great. Would have expected more, which makes me hope this is a complete fabrication.
Not reading this entire thread, but IF that is a real email, I support JP 100%.
Thats not what I am say, I said THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO SUPPORT THE TEAM THAN JUST BUYING TICKETS!I didn't say it wasn't. But there's no reason for you to carry this over to your own situation.
You saying that this guy was threatening to stop watching TV? That was what he was trying to convey in that email.
Nice try.
Good one!:biglaugh::biglaugh:Why do these radio guys get on this site? Don't they have enough air time to give people their worthless opinions?
Thats not what I am say, I said THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO SUPPORT THE TEAM THAN JUST BUYING TICKETS!
That is simply incorrect. They are entertainers who give their opinions.
Therefore they are not bound by the "rules" of hard-news journalism.
You do realize that it was a response to a single "fan" who did nothing in his initial email but rip the team, staff and program - and PROMISED to no longer fund the program?
"I see no improvement and until I do I will not be putting any of my money into your program"
This guy threatened to deny something he doesn't provide in the first place. JP called him on it.
It's not a blanket statement of lack of support across the fan base and those who don't donate.
When they make a living out of interviewing newsmakers and "breaking news" themselves, including posting documents and indicating they are something that they may or may not be, they are acting as journalists and as such should consider themselves bound by the ethics of journalism.
They can't have it both ways.
If a columnist (who makes a living out of writing opinion) puts something in their column that is false and presents it as fact, they are subject to the same ethics. A columnist who presents something as fact (not opinion) which is proven to be not factual, they have a pretty good chance of getting fired. I would bet that the majority of columnists for reputable papers put "journalist" as their profession on their tax return. How is what the sports radio "entertainers" do any different than a columnist other than the media?
Exactly, but its not like he has ever gotten anything right in the past, probably was him. I could see an email like this coming from him, he is putting his job on the line for keeping McDermott.
1- Not true. They are not journalists. They do not pretend to be.
2-What did they present that was false?
When they make a living out of interviewing newsmakers and "breaking news" themselves, including posting documents and indicating they are something that they may or may not be, they are acting as journalists and as such should consider themselves bound by the ethics of journalism.
They can't have it both ways.
If a columnist (who makes a living out of writing opinion) puts something in their column that is false and presents it as fact, they are subject to the same ethics. A columnist who presents something as fact (not opinion) which is proven to be not factual, they have a pretty good chance of getting fired. I would bet that the majority of columnists for reputable papers put "journalist" as their profession on their tax return. How is what the sports radio "entertainers" do any different than a columnist other than the media?
How is what the sports radio "entertainers" do any different than a columnist other than the media?
How is what they do different than what David Letterman does? Do you consider David Letterman to be a journalist?
1. They do PRETEND to be.
2. Read back over my posts. I never said they did publish anything that was false. I said that they have a responsibility to fact check. To this point neither of those involved who have followed and contributed to this thread have volunteered that they did any fact checking. They simply said they gave Pollard a regular invitation to the show (paraphrasing). They volunteered a lot to leave an important detail like that out. I have been very careful to not suggest anything regarding the veracity of the email they posted. If I have said anything of the sort, please quote it and I will be happy to retract it.
When they make a living out of interviewing newsmakers and "breaking news" themselves, including posting documents and indicating they are something that they may or may not be, they are acting as journalists and as such should consider themselves bound by the ethics of journalism.
They can't have it both ways.
If a columnist (who makes a living out of writing opinion) puts something in their column that is false and presents it as fact, they are subject to the same ethics. A columnist who presents something as fact (not opinion) which is proven to be not factual, they have a pretty good chance of getting fired. I would bet that the majority of columnists for reputable papers put "journalist" as their profession on their tax return. How is what the sports radio "entertainers" do any different than a columnist other than the media?[/QUOTE]
Cyhart since you are willing to respond to part of my email, how about answering my question...
Lets take a controversial Tv program like say, The Oreilly Factor. That is an opinion/entertainment program as well as much as people want to paint it as the opposite. Opinion/editiorials are not the same as hard news journalism.
1- I guess we disagree. Im also guessing that you and I differ on our opinions on censorship.
2-I dont know the rules on that for certain, but I would definitely think that they would want to fact check for the purpose of credibility.