Not really, actually. For its size, they haven't produced much talent at all in the past 15 years.
eric crouch! :smile:
Not really, actually. For its size, they haven't produced much talent at all in the past 15 years.
We need defensive tackles BADLY.
Now that we got boyd can we get his teamate Stephon Sanders - Yahoo! Sports also Brakens lives in the same town
If I didn't know any better, I'd think you were a genius. :wink:
Not really, actually. For its size, they haven't produced much talent at all in the past 10 years.
Not really, actually. For its size, they (Omaha) haven't produced much talent at all in the past 10 years.
Some have the size, frame and potential to grow into DL. This is something Iowa has done well and we should take note (damn that hurt to say). They take tweener kids and grow them into good to great players. They take bigger/slower safeties and grow them into LBs. They take bigger/slower LBs and grow them into DT/DEs. That is how they built the program and had success. Now that they have been successful they can get the next tier of athletes. just look at their current DL. I may be wrong but most have made position changes since they were Fresh.It is nice to have some commits flowing in. The only downside is none are DTs or DEs. As was posted previously, we desperately need some!
Angerer was a 6'0" 200 pound(not exactly big 10 size) LB recruit. AJ Edds was a TE recruit (Purdue looked at him for LB). Klug was a MLB or DL recruit, as were King and Kroul. Ballard was recruited as a TE with potential to play OL or DL/DE. Binns was a LB that Iowa recruited to play DE. It is just crazy to look at their defensive roster. They take "football players" find a spot for them and develop them. that is exactly what we need to do.
I think if you look at the offensive side of the ball we are doing the same thing. I may be wrong but when TT was building their program, they didn't have many Michael Crabtrees. Instead they had a bunch of waterbug type receivers that made plays after the catch. Once successful, they can pull in some of the bigger faster receivers as well.SPOT ON assessment....
To me, thats exactly what our staff is doing...recruiting tweeners or slightly off ideal size. IMO i will take a faster 6'-0 200 lb'er then i would a taller 6'3 200 lb'er....
Get athletes, then find a place for them.....thats the biggest difference when we play top tier teams, overall athleticism....
Some have the size, frame and potential to grow into DL. This is something Iowa has done well and we should take note (damn that hurt to say). They take tweener kids and grow them into good to great players. They take bigger/slower safeties and grow them into LBs. They take bigger/slower LBs and grow them into DT/DEs. That is how they built the program and had success. Now that they have been successful they can get the next tier of athletes. just look at their current DL. I may be wrong but most have made position changes since they were Fresh.
Angerer was a 6'0" 200 pound(not exactly big 10 size) LB recruit. AJ Edds was a TE recruit (Purdue looked at him for LB). Klug was a MLB or DL recruit, as were King and Kroul. Ballard was recruited as a TE with potential to play OL or DL/DE. Binns was a LB that Iowa recruited to play DE. It is just crazy to look at their defensive roster. They take "football players" find a spot for them and develop them. that is exactly what we need to do.
I believe it'll be a class of somewhere between 18-21 this year, but I could be wrong.
We only have 18 seniors scholarship players plus Haughton leaving. I think we are closer to the 85 limit than you think. We have had full classes the last few years and have had little attrition.I've heard the same thing, but I don't understand why. As far I know, ISU isn't really near the 85 scholarship limit. Anyone know why the coaching staff is putting together a smaller class this year?
Hopefully some of these guys can grow into a position on the DL but that's a couple years down the road and we need some big bodies who are ready to go in 2011:
29 Parker, Rashawn DE 6-0 250 RSr.
85 Johnson, Bailey DL 6-2 279 RSr.
96 Alburtis, Austin DL 6-2 269 RSr.
26 Mansfield, Taylor DE 6-1 253 RSr.
91 Neal, Patrick DE 6-0 227 RJr.
98 Black, Jerrod DL 6-0 279 RJr.
97 Ruempolhamer, Stephen DL 6-3 280 Jr.
38 Maggitt, Roosevelt DE 6-1 242 RSo.
90 Laing, Cleyon DE 6-3 266 RSo.
94 McDonough, Jake DL 6-5 270 RSo.
53 Jacobs, Joe DL 5-11 235 RSo.
95 Woods III, Walter DL 6-0 297 RFr.
50 Scott, Willie DE 6-1 214 RFr.
93 Moore, Aaron DE 6-2 244 RFr.
74 Kingston, Tyler DL 6-3 280 Fr.
We have some experience returning THIS YEAR but most of them are seniors. The junior class hasn't produced much so far (58 tackles, 2 career sacks) even though Neal and Ruemp saw extensive playing time last year. The sophomores haven't played much at all. The wildcard is the three redshirt freshmen; are any of these guys ready to make some noise come this fall?
Let's say the worst case scenario plays out meaning that Nelson is a bust, the 2011 recruiting class is light on big fellas and the redshirt freshmen aren't ready yet. That would mean the starters in 2011 would likely be Neal, Reump, McDonough and Maggitt with only 2 career sacks between them. The backups would be even bigger question marks. Let's hope it doesn't come down to that!
Psyched about anybody whose going to be a Cyclone, but...Who begs BAYLOR for an offer?!