if he throws the ball instead of lobs it up, this could be a very happy board right now
I like the call to go for it at the end, but I would have preferred Arnaud be the guy who executed it. Damn it sucks to lose this one.
if he throws the ball instead of lobs it up, this could be a very happy board right now
U always go Defense in college OTLoved the call in OT - as someone said - any zip whatsoever on that pass and it's an easy 2 pts. The question I would be asking myself as a staff - why not choose to go with the wind after winning the toss. I understand the whole "defense gets to know how many pts. you have to go for" at the end. But, wind was such an obvious factor in this game - and going with the wind did not favor Nebraska one bit - but our offense sure looked darn good with the wind. Plus - score the first touchdown in OT - puts MAJOR pressure on a team that quite frankly couldn't have been very confident at that point. Well - Love the heart of this team. No complaints - GO CYCLONES!
I don't mind going for the win there. By if you decide to go for two I'd much rather see the offense out on the field trying to pick up a couple yards instead of relying on your holder to make the game winning pass. Tell your offense as they run on the field that you are going to punch it in the end zone and then we are going to leave you out there to win the game for us. Faking the extra point just seems like too much of a hope and prayer instead of letting your playmakers win the game.
If Arnaud were the one holding there's no element of surprise. The only other guys you could have thrown in there is Capello.
They were saying on the TV broadcast that in overtime, the winner of the coin toss has to choose offense or defense. The choice of wind/which end to defend is not an option on the overtime coin toss.The question I would be asking myself as a staff - why not choose to go with the wind after winning the toss.