You can't go deep if you don't have time to get deep.
Wrong. How long does it take to throw a fade pass? .5 seconds? A quick seam pass to Franklin? Not very long.
You can't go deep if you don't have time to get deep.
Wrong. How long does it take to throw a fade pass? .5 seconds? A quick seam pass to Franklin? Not very long.
Wrong. How long does it take to throw a fade pass? .5 seconds? A quick seam pass to Franklin? Not very long.
It takes much longer than that especially when everyone is getting jammed.
You can't throw a fade with a ton of field and a safety on each side back there. It ends up picked. What ISU receiver do you trust to win a jump ball with Colorado's 6'0" and 6'1" receivers?
Can't throw the quick seam when you have to move immediately after your three step drop.
We run out of a shotgun so this is moot but usually a QB does a 2 step drop and throws that pass.
There is a HUGE difference between a back shoulder fade in the end zone and a fade from the ISU 30 yard line. The back shoulder fade puts the corner on an island with no help. A fade from the 30 yard line puts a pair of safeties at the 50 yard line. Let's also throw in the fact that CU's 2 corners played bump coverage the entire game, something we don't have receivers willing to fight through. Let's also throw out there that Colorado's corners were 6'0" and 6'1". Yes, a fade sounds like a brilliant plan. If we had anyone that could fight off press coverage, we couldn't carved them on slants, but we don't.Sorry that just isn't true. You can throw it down the field. If the safeties start cheating toward the sideline than that opens up the middle of the field!
And who do I trust to win a jump ball for ISU? I don't know maybe Jake Williams! Nebraska has the top DB's in college football and we threw that back shoulder fade to him to perfection. Why not do that against Colorado's weak secondary?
To say that we can't run the fade is so comical when we just did it the weak before for 2 TD's
Our QBs were running for their lives as soon as the ball was snapped yesterday. About the only thing they were able to get off quickly were slants and bubble screens.
There is a HUGE difference between a back shoulder fade in the end zone and a fade from the ISU 30 yard line. The back shoulder fade puts the corner on an island with no help. A fade from the 30 yard line puts a pair of safeties at the 50 yard line. Let's also throw in the fact that CU's 2 corners played bump coverage the entire game, something we don't have receivers willing to fight through. Let's also throw out there that Colorado's corners were 6'0" and 6'1". Yes, a fade sounds like a brilliant plan. If we had anyone that could fight off press coverage, we couldn't carved them on slants, but we don't.
That's just not true. There were a couple times where they were but they also had some plays where we had time and threw short passes.
Listen the O line played horrible. But the coaches have to help them out as well and adjust to what Colorado was doing. No adjustments made on offense at all
I'm not blaming the lose on the oline. Every aspect of the team was horrible yesterday. No one goes without blame.
They didn't play well at all. BUT Tom Herman didn't help them out either. Colorado was stacking the box and bringing pressure. We never threw a screen pass (minus the obvious one on 3rd and 20) and we never threw the ball down field. Despite what people think, you can throw the ball down field on a quick three step drop. A fade pass or a seam route to Franklin. Neither need very much time to have happen
When a defense is coming at you as much as Colorados was coming at us yesterday, you have to call plays that soften up the defense a bit. Even if it is an incomplete pass, the threat that you will actually throw down field can be enough to open up some runs and give Arnaud some more time.
Hell, even a swing pass to Arob would make the linebacker have to stay at home. Just a horrible offensive gameplan by Herman and even worse that he didn't make any adjustments to what the Colorado defense was doing
You can bi-sect...di-sect the colorado game all you want but when coach rhoads or any coach for that matter sez....We had NO RUNNING GAME....You're in a heap of trouble!!
The OLine just has to provide running lanes for the backs for us to have any chance against Mizzou come saturday night.
Go Cyclones Schock The Tigers!!!
We have been poor stopping stunts and blitzes all year. It is nothing new. Her eis how you defend ISU...Bring your safeties up, stunt, blitz and play press coverage. Utah, OU, and CU figured that out.I can't second guess Herman. I have no idea what coverages he saw from the booth or what coverages he saw as he watched and broke down more gamefilm in a week then this entire board has done in our collective lifetimes. Nothing would have worked yesterday. AA was inaccurate, the OL couldn't stop all the stunting blitzes as they were coming from everywhere, the couldn't get any pressure and our blitzes were predictable and were picked up easily...
It was just one of those games that really borderline average teams like ISU have on the road.
Our receivers pretty much lack the speed to be deep threats when we do have good protection. With the OL performance yesterday, no way could we go deep. Not a chance at all.
You can't throw a fade with a ton of field and a safety on each side back there. It ends up picked. What ISU receiver do you trust to win a jump ball with Colorado's 6'0" and 6'1" receivers?
Can't throw the quick seam when you have to move immediately after your three step drop.