HEY! It's the Cyclotron! Get it right!
Someone coined the nickname "F5" which I think is perfect or if you wanted to you could go with "F5 Cyclotron".
HEY! It's the Cyclotron! Get it right!
CycoTron
Yeah.. you lose a lot of space there. Yeah, our new video board is a lot larger than the old one, but if part of it is always ads then the difference in effective space is less (since the old ads werent part of the video board)
Thats where somewhere down the road it might be nice to widen the video screen by a section (it looked like there was plenty of space to do that and still have the speakers.. the speakers dont take up much space) and put the ads there.
So, is the actual video part that shows the plays, etc any bigger than the old one?
2851 sq ft vs 543 sq ft
You still go to be disappointed with actual video size 3-4 times more and a better sound system?2,851 sq ft is the total area I believe? You need to subtract off all the ad space and the time and score part too. Probably around 1500-1800 sq ft I'd guess?
2,851 sq ft is the total area I believe? You need to subtract off all the ad space and the time and score part too. Probably around 1500-1800 sq ft I'd guess?
You still go to be disappointed with actual video size 3-4 times more and a better sound system?
Size looks great, structure looks great...I know it was briefly mentioned on another thread, but what about the brightness issue? All of these images are very hard to see.
Let me stress, for all of those out to shoot anyone with any question...I am not complaining, but it would be helpful to actually be able to see the video.
Yep. Huge improvements to our gameday atmosphere and yet people will still complain about it.
Yes, it's totally improbably to think with a press of a button they can't use the entire video display to do replays (obviously with a frame on the replay but the point stands). You'd think some people in here were actually more intelligent than the designers. :skeptical: