If Longhorns went to Big 10, Nebby would have to move again.
But UT playing in the Pac 10 will automatically give A&M a boost with some top athletes. They might be intrigued by playing against the best, each and every week.
Also, you act as if A&M could never upgrade their coach. They could easily hire a very good coach that is also a great recruiter. My point is, that they have just as much "infrastructure" as say Arkansas, Auburn or South Carolina. What I mean by infrastructure is alumni base, local talent to recruit, money and facilities.
It's not like if we're talking Texas Tech or KU going to the SEC.
Didn't take long at all to reach 19 pages. Longest thread in CF history coming?
I don't think A&M really cares if they are moving to a slightly more difficult conference. They've been shat on for the past 10 years by the bright orange cows in Austin and they've had enough. This isn't about who they are going to play, this is simply a big "**** you" to Texas.
I don't think A&M really cares if they are moving to a slightly more difficult conference. They've been shat on for the past 10 years by the bright orange cows in Austin and they've had enough. This isn't about who they are going to play, this is simply a big "**** you" to Texas.
Quick question: Do you think the a$m-UT rivalry continues if they split conferences?
That would be a schedule from hell considering their division.
Yep, if the conference can work it out. A&M fans still want to play it on Thanksgiving.
Why have "4 conferences of relevance"???
If Big East fears getting poached as well... and the 9 other Big 12 schools are 'solid' as some are saying... we would poach as well and just broaden the Big 12 market.
BYU, (ND probably not but who knows), Cincinati, Louisville, West Virginia, Pittsburgh, TCU. Alternatives include Boise State, New Mexico, other Big East Leftovers, smaller conference schools.
Clearly if 16 team super conferences were to form... we would have a solid foundation of 9 teams to start with and would have the 'room' to work with rivalries and 'package deal' teams.
With our first tier rights coming up... I think we're a good option for other teams... especially considering every non-Texas addition would just make our conference a bigger footprint.
Schools like ISU (scoreboard) and KSU (Press Box) have secured loans based on teams signing on to stay together and projected revenues. If for some reason either school is left out and the conference dismantles with no exit fees then I think there would be massive lawsuits against the other schools.
I wonder how many seasons without a bowl game it would take for them to change that tune.
Not sure what the longest thread on cyclonefanatic is, but this one was pretty dang long:Didn't take long at all to reach 19 pages. Longest thread in CF history coming?
Not sure what the longest thread on cyclonefanatic is, but this one was pretty dang long:
http://www.cyclonefanatic.com/forum/off-topic/21005-plane-treadmill.html
I understand that they think that, but really, how is it a big **** you to Texas? How is Texas hurt by this move at all? Is Texas suddenly going to make less money because of this? Are their chances at a title game lessened? Texas is going to be fine. The big **** you part is more directed at teams like Baylor, K-State, and ISU.