*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
If Texas doesn't have the LHN, they could leave for any other conference. They could go to the b10 and make MORE money than here. The LHN is probably the only thing keeping them here.
This is why ESPN gummed up the works with $300M.
 

gocubs2118

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2006
18,599
2,829
113
37
Illinois
Correct. It's not as if Chip Brown is the only one saying this. Someone else linked a story in the NY Times I think it was that also mentioned KU, KSU, and Mizzou to the Big East. There have been many, many other articles too.

Usually when there's that much smoke, there's fire. Why don't you see us mentioned basically anywhere? That is a bit disconcerting if you ask me.

You think everything is disconcerting.
 

NobodyBeatsCy

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2008
3,750
633
113
Clive, IA
Time for another scenario

Let's say UT, Syracuse, UConn, Rutgers go to ACC
And OSU, OU, KU, KSU go to PAC 10
And MU, A&M go to SEC

That leaves ISU, Baylor and Tech. I think we all 3 go to Big East along with Houston, ECU and UCF. That would not be as good as I would hope, BUT it would still be a BCS conference and I stil think it has enough markets to give us a tv contract better than what we have NOW, but not what we would have had.

The divisions would be

WEST
ISU
TCU
Baylor
Houston
Texas Tech
Louisville

EAST
Cincinnati
South Florida
Central Florida
East Carolina
Pittsburgh
West Virginia

For BB, add
Marquette, Notre Dame and DePaul to west and move Cincinnati to west.
Georgetown, Villanova, Seton Hall, Providence and St. John's to east.


I swear to God, I hope someone is keeping all the worthless conference brackets posted on this site and holds the creators accountable for all the stupidity. There should be a flag next to their user name signifying "Documented Spewer of Worthless Information"
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
But it appears that if OU and Texas stay, then no other team will be able to leave. Missouri has had a few dates, but apparently it wasn't good enough to get a ring. In Chip's article it says OU and Texas met again today, hmmm...to talk about sticking together? If they stick together, they will stay where they are. No one butA&M leaves if they stay, maybe it just prolongs the agony, but Texas and OU are strong enough brands to make their own way...
Maybe the LHON?
 

justcynn

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2009
1,697
87
48
Cabot, AR
Correct. It's not as if Chip Brown is the only one saying this. Someone else linked a story in the NY Times I think it was that also mentioned KU, KSU, and Mizzou to the Big East. There have been many, many other articles too.

Usually when there's that much smoke, there's fire. Why don't you see us mentioned basically anywhere? That is a bit disconcerting if you ask me.
making way too much of the lack of mention imo, its like the last team in the former field of 64, fan support, travel, attendance, etc matter, Pollard has done what he needed to do to keep ISU up to par with the Jones with facilities, we are so far ahead of the the doomsday predictors its not even close, academically we were always there ISU gets picked for its brains not brawn, so when the lawsuits come from those that were left out - all the defense attorney has to say is "ISU is included, anymore questions"
 

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
I swear to God, I hope someone is keeping all the worthless conference brackets posted on this site and holds the creators accountable for all the stupidity. There should be a flag next to their user name signifying "Documented Spewer of Worthless Information"

I think it is fun to build scenarios like these. Do I think they will come true? No. If you don't like them, scroll past them. But most stuff on message boards could be included in the category of "Worthless Information".
 
Last edited:

Nycclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 24, 2010
1,323
564
113
45
Correct. It's not as if Chip Brown is the only one saying this. Someone else linked a story in the NY Times I think it was that also mentioned KU, KSU, and Mizzou to the Big East. There have been many, many other articles too.

Usually when there's that much smoke, there's fire. Why don't you see us mentioned basically anywhere? That is a bit disconcerting if you ask me.

Well it was the new York post. . . I love that paper, it looks like a tabloid. Great read when I am drunk at a bar. . .
 

dxmonger

Active Member
Dec 18, 2008
115
49
28
I swear to God, I hope someone is keeping all the worthless conference brackets posted on this site and holds the creators accountable for all the stupidity. There should be a flag next to their user name signifying "Documented Spewer of Worthless Information"


Agreed! This isn't NCAA bracketology - it's conference alignment.

We're talkin' University Presidents involved, Regents, fans wanting to maintain rivalries, big dollar donors, TV money, - there's a lot of variables here. To think that this shakeup will have virtually every school hopping to a new conference, or sub-conference/division is insane.

Will conference shake-ups continue? Yes.
Will it be a total scramble as proposed by many here? No way.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
If the Big East was hoping Villanova would move up to FBS to be their 14th team, I'd say they would take ECU, Houston, or just about anyone.

Their worry should be Pitt. If I was the commissioner, I would get every AD to call Pitt and tell them how much they love them. I don't know how the Big East makes it without Pitt. Beno Cook would no longer give Big East football any love on ESPN. (Is he still alive?)

There is almost no way that this goes down without the Big East being raided and losing 1-3 teams. That is assuming that the Pac 12 goes to 16, which will likely trigger the SEC to AT LEAST go to 14. That probably means Mizzou to the SEC or the SEC going after an ACC/Big East team. If the ACC gets raided, then they will fill from the Big East.
 

Rogue52

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 20, 2006
8,969
3,606
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Baylor "committed to the Big XII" and then goes on to talk about just wanting to keep Texas football together.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
Won't need a website in less than 3 weeks just before conference starts. David Boren said so.
 

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
Well it was the new York post. . . I love that paper, it looks like a tabloid. Great read when I am drunk at a bar. . .

Correct, NY Times mentioned multiple teams, but not specifics. NY Post mentioned KU, KSU and MU, but in their article, they said KU, KSU, MU and ISU reached agreements with Big East last year, but that ISU was expendable because of TCU. They didn't have anyone confirm that those were the schools that the Big East was talking to.
 

DSM4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 4, 2006
2,589
3,213
113
Altoona, IA
BREAKING NEWS: Big XII To Announce Three New Members Tuesday

Breaking news: Big XII Conference to announce invitation of new schools on Tuesday. It's expected that the league's commissioner, Dan Beebe, will announce that the University of Texas, the University of Texas, and the Detroit Lions have accepted positions in the Big XII, thus ensuring the conference's stability at 12 teams.

"We're really very excited about the future of the Big XII," says DeLoss Dodds, University of Texas AD. "Our opportunity to compete well and win in this league has just gotten much greater, and we look forward to the new quality of our competition."

The Detroit Lions organization was said to be ecstatic about once again having the chance of making it to the playoffs. Quarterback Matthew Stafford has been quoted as saying, "we've finally gotten ourselves to the point where we are evenly matched against our competition."
 

justcynn

Well-Known Member
Sep 28, 2009
1,697
87
48
Cabot, AR
Baylor "committed to the Big XII" and then goes on to talk about just wanting to keep Texas football together.
Baylor and ISU are in a similar boat, historically irrelevant in Fball, at present they have their seneca and will make some noise but in the end will be happy to visit Shreveport, while others feel confident if it comes down to KSU, BU and ISU, ISU prevails...not so sure about that. I don't think it comes to that, but BU, KSU are more relevant thant ISU to most in Fball, KSU for its success with the before he was Old Snyder and BU for its location in Texas..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron