*****The Super, Mega, Huge Big 12 Expansion Thread*****

Status
Not open for further replies.

State43

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2010
17,201
3,519
113
Omaha, NE
Hypothetical: If the Big 12 were to stay together at 7 and add 2-5 teams, how upset are you if you're Oklahoma State that you've completely cut ties with your recruiting pipeline of Texas? You're playing maybe 1 game a year in California, but who cares? I'm sure OU recruiting will be okay no matter what, but if I'm OSU I get worried if nobody else follow OU and OSU to the PAC.

I think even OU will struggle recruiting Texas too. I think there will be a lot of animosity there if this all happens.
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
Pac East you mean :)


Pac MAN!

images
 

Yes13

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2009
3,371
260
83
First, it depends on the 2-5 schools that are brought in. If we're talking about an outright merge with the Big East, while it's not the Big 12 we've enjoyed for the last 25 years, it's acceptable. If this conference decides to invite a cadre of Texas teams and turns this into the SWCv.2, no thanks. That conference wouldn't be nearly as good as it is now while being more insufferable than it has been the last couple of years.

Second, if OU and OSU go, I don't think it stops there - the Pac 1X won't stop then until it gets to 16, which means two more teams, and everyone (except Baylor) including ISU has been mentioned as a possible team for that conference. Let's go out in left field and say the Pac 1X takes OU, OSU, KU, and ISU - likely that means Mizzou has gone to the SEC with A$M. Does Texas think a conference of TT, Baylor, and K-State is worth saving? And that's assuming there's nothing to the ACC or B1G rumors.

The bottom line, if OU does go to the Pac 12, the likelihood of the salvation of the Big 12 is not Kokusai, at the very least it will look nothing like what it looks like right now.
I could see the PAC getting screwed again. Last year they thought they were getting the Big 12 south, instead they get Colorado and Utah, this year they think they are getting either Texas/TTech or Kansas/Mizzou to go along with OU/OSU and end up getting Nevada and New Mexico.
 

State43

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2010
17,201
3,519
113
Omaha, NE
I know this may sound crazy, but adding Nevada, New Mexico and BYU could be a good idea. Sure, they may not be much now, but with their huge geographical footprint and influx of revenue $, they could build good programs out there and be the primary team of the state. Just a thought.
And maybe Tulsa to fill the gab of OU and OSU
 

oldwiseman

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2009
1,368
681
113
The only thing that makes sense is for the Big XII to remain.

None of the Big XII schools are a fit in the Pac 12. Colorado and Utah are a fit. That made sense.

No Big XII school is a fit in the Big East. Neither is TCU for that matter.

ISU, MO, KU and outside of academics, KSU are a great fit for the B1G but that leaves TX, OU, OSU, TT, Baylor, and for the moment aTm with nothing unless they picked up Houston, SMU, etc... then you might as well just call it the TX conference. OU is basically a team of texans anyway.

According to numerous reports, no one wants 16 teams and the B1G is content with what they have, and they should be.

OU and OSU are going to come to their senses I think. I really believe this is all just posturing for a better deal within the Big XII outside of aTm. I believe they really do want to get out.

The amount of travel required to play in a conference like the Pac 16 for an OU and OSU would be ridiculous. Forget Football for a minute because travel is minimal in football anyway. You take a handful of trips a year. But look at every other sport that is non revenue producing. Good luck with that future OU and OSU recruits!

Look at the pros and cons of staying and leaving...

Staying
Continue to recruit TX (HUGE)
Maintain lucrative TV contracts
Maintain a conference that exists in one time zone
Keel rivalries alive
By staying, you have a real shot at being in the Nat. Champ. game every year
You have the right to develop your own network
If you stay and ACTUALLY commit with the rest of the teams, you have stability
You have TX at the table willing to negotiate revenue sharing. Take advantage of it!

Leaving
You screw TX
You MIGHT get more money from TV but then spend it on your non rev sports traveling
You gain recruiting on the West Coast (which in my opinion doesn't offset losing TX)

That's it. I see nothing more to gain. In the end, it makes no sense whatsoever. Take the emotion out of all of this and I think the Big XII remains, adds teams and gets stronger.
 

brett108

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2010
5,262
2,142
113
Tulsa, OK
I know this may sound crazy, but adding Nevada, New Mexico and BYU could be a good idea. Sure, they may not be much now, but with their huge geographical footprint and influx of revenue $, they could build good programs out there and be the primary team of the state. Just a thought.
And maybe Tulsa to fill the gab of OU and OSU

Way too many reaches here. The problem is if Ou and OSU leave, two of your top three remaining teams just left. replacing them with the above schools does not keep the Big 12 a BCS auto qualifier,and no network is going to pay you that much for this lineup. Also, UT will leave, and all this is for naught. OU needs to stay.
 

brett108

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2010
5,262
2,142
113
Tulsa, OK
The only thing that makes sense is for the Big XII to remain.

None of the Big XII schools are a fit in the Pac 12. Colorado and Utah are a fit. That made sense.

No Big XII school is a fit in the Big East. Neither is TCU for that matter.

ISU, MO, KU and outside of academics, KSU are a great fit for the B1G but that leaves TX, OU, OSU, TT, Baylor, and for the moment aTm with nothing unless they picked up Houston, SMU, etc... then you might as well just call it the TX conference. OU is basically a team of texans anyway.

According to numerous reports, no one wants 16 teams and the B1G is content with what they have, and they should be.

OU and OSU are going to come to their senses I think. I really believe this is all just posturing for a better deal within the Big XII outside of aTm. I believe they really do want to get out.

The amount of travel required to play in a conference like the Pac 16 for an OU and OSU would be ridiculous. Forget Football for a minute because travel is minimal in football anyway. You take a handful of trips a year. But look at every other sport that is non revenue producing. Good luck with that future OU and OSU recruits!

Look at the pros and cons of staying and leaving...

Staying
Continue to recruit TX (HUGE)
Maintain lucrative TV contracts
Maintain a conference that exists in one time zone
Keel rivalries alive
By staying, you have a real shot at being in the Nat. Champ. game every year
You have the right to develop your own network
If you stay and ACTUALLY commit with the rest of the teams, you have stability
You have TX at the table willing to negotiate revenue sharing. Take advantage of it!

Leaving
You screw TX
You MIGHT get more money from TV but then spend it on your non rev sports traveling
You gain recruiting on the West Coast (which in my opinion doesn't offset losing TX)

That's it. I see nothing more to gain. In the end, it makes no sense whatsoever. Take the emotion out of all of this and I think the Big XII remains, adds teams and gets stronger.
Don't lump OSU in with OU. OSU has a much pull in this as ISU does. They just have a strong dance partner to insure a good landing. We don't.
 

Judoka

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2010
17,542
2,645
113
Timbuktu
MU and ISU are perfect fits in the B1G culturally , geographically, academically, and in terms of commitment to a complete AD (not just football/basketball). But none of that matters at all in this realignment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wesley

Yes13

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2009
3,371
260
83
I know this may sound crazy, but adding Nevada, New Mexico and BYU could be a good idea. Sure, they may not be much now, but with their huge geographical footprint and influx of revenue $, they could build good programs out there and be the primary team of the state. Just a thought.
And maybe Tulsa to fill the gab of OU and OSU
No. We would become the Big East of the midwest.
 

oldwiseman

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2009
1,368
681
113
Don't lump OSU in with OU. OSU has a much pull in this as ISU does. They just have a strong dance partner to insure a good landing. We don't.

I added OSU BECAUSE they are joined at the hip to OU. It makes even less sense for them than it does for OU!
 

State43

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2010
17,201
3,519
113
Omaha, NE
No. We would become the Big East of the midwest.

VS what? What would our other options be, by all means tell me the magic programs that would leave where they are to come to this conference of 7? No matter what, big east of the midwest is our best option if OU is gone.
 

CrossCyed

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
10,875
2,342
113
ChrisLevel Chris Level
Change of plans. Big 12 presidents have canceled that meeting originally set for today. More waiting ... carry on.
35 minutes ago
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,630
23,888
113
Macomb, MI
The only thing that makes sense is for the Big XII to remain.

None of the Big XII schools are a fit in the Pac 12. Colorado and Utah are a fit. That made sense.

No Big XII school is a fit in the Big East. Neither is TCU for that matter.

ISU, MO, KU and outside of academics, KSU are a great fit for the B1G but that leaves TX, OU, OSU, TT, Baylor, and for the moment aTm with nothing unless they picked up Houston, SMU, etc... then you might as well just call it the TX conference. OU is basically a team of texans anyway.

According to numerous reports, no one wants 16 teams and the B1G is content with what they have, and they should be.

OU and OSU are going to come to their senses I think. I really believe this is all just posturing for a better deal within the Big XII outside of aTm. I believe they really do want to get out.

The amount of travel required to play in a conference like the Pac 16 for an OU and OSU would be ridiculous. Forget Football for a minute because travel is minimal in football anyway. You take a handful of trips a year. But look at every other sport that is non revenue producing. Good luck with that future OU and OSU recruits!

Look at the pros and cons of staying and leaving...

Staying
Continue to recruit TX (HUGE)
Maintain lucrative TV contracts
Maintain a conference that exists in one time zone
Keel rivalries alive
By staying, you have a real shot at being in the Nat. Champ. game every year
You have the right to develop your own network
If you stay and ACTUALLY commit with the rest of the teams, you have stability
You have TX at the table willing to negotiate revenue sharing. Take advantage of it!

Leaving
You screw TX
You MIGHT get more money from TV but then spend it on your non rev sports traveling
You gain recruiting on the West Coast (which in my opinion doesn't offset losing TX)

That's it. I see nothing more to gain. In the end, it makes no sense whatsoever. Take the emotion out of all of this and I think the Big XII remains, adds teams and gets stronger.

It's not that I disagree with you - the thing you're not taking into account is it's not sense that's driving this superconference drama, it's how much television $$$ can be made in the process. That's why you're seeing teams like Texas to the B1G or ACC, OU and OSU (plus others) to the Pac 12, Middle Atlantic/New York teams to the B1G, Midwest teams to the Big East, etc. Sense isn't driving this, the amount of insane television revenue that can be made is.

The other thing that isn't being taken into account is who says this thing stops at 64? Who's to say that a decade from now the larger schools are sick of splitting revenues with schools like Mississippi St and Indiana and as a result whittle this thing down to 48 or even 32? Don't say it'll never happen - wasn't the split of DI into A and AA supposed to be the last great split? And yet here we are, looking to do it again...
 

oldwiseman

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2009
1,368
681
113
It's not that I disagree with you - the thing you're not taking into account is it's not sense that's driving this superconference drama, it's how much television $$$ can be made in the process. That's why you're seeing teams like Texas to the B1G or ACC, OU and OSU (plus others) to the Pac 12, Middle Atlantic/New York teams to the B1G, Midwest teams to the Big East, etc. Sense isn't driving this, the amount of insane television revenue that can be made is.

The other thing that isn't being taken into account is who says this thing stops at 64? Who's to say that a decade from now the larger schools are sick of splitting revenues with schools like Mississippi St and Indiana and as a result whittle this thing down to 48 or even 32? Don't say it'll never happen - wasn't the split of DI into A and AA supposed to be the last great split? And yet here we are, looking to do it again...

I fully understand it's about money. And I'm saying the Big XII has a lucrative contract in place already that OU gets a nice chunk of and rights to their own network if they choose to pursue it. They may get slightly more money in a PAC 16 but the revenue would be offset by their increased travel costs. Not to mention increased recruiting costs as they start to recruit from the West coast as well! It's all about money and that's one of the main reasons the Big XII makes the most sense.

In the end, believe it or not, logic will prevail and the Big XII will remain in some form. That is the conclusion I've come to.
 

Yes13

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2009
3,371
260
83
VS what? What would our other options be, by all means tell me the magic programs that would leave where they are to come to this conference of 7? No matter what, big east of the midwest is our best option if OU is gone.
BYU, Louisville, Southern Miss.
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,478
14,352
113
BYU, Louisville, Southern Miss.

Definite possibilities there. IMO, you could add Cincinnati, Memphis to the mix as well. Houston would jump at the chance. And others as well. The key thing is that Texas is the lynchpin. And I do NOT see them going to the ACC. That is insane. Some sort of conference will evolve. And some schools will step up and fill the vacuum if OU and OSU leave as well.

There is too much money in the present contract for Tier 2 rights to let it go. And Tier 1 comes up in a few years. Pac ?? keeps adding teams and dividing up the fixed amount of money. Dividing $250 million per year by 16 teams does not make any economic sense at all. The money will be much greater in the Big 12 after the Tier 1 contract is done in just a few years.

My prediction is that the Big 12 will exist in some form. With Texas staying. There are a number of teams out there that will come on board for the $$$$. The Big East is far from stable as well. And the ACC too. Teams could be poached. SEC will add a 14th team. And it will not be Texas. And I doubt it is Mizzou.
 

State43

Well-Known Member
Nov 22, 2010
17,201
3,519
113
Omaha, NE
Once againt, Louisville, Southern Miss and Cincinnati will not leave their stable AQ conference to play with the Texas 7. Wont happen which is why I said the teams I said. Houston and Memphis maybe, but those teams don't really bring much more than the teams I listed and another team in Texas does nothing but take talent that would come to us away as they would prefer to play in Texas if in the same conference. Until the Big East loses a team, they are stable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.