This post gets my vote for the best "I'm Clueless" post of the day. What that article said was less about Beebe and more about telling Texas that equity is a must in the new BIG XII. Equity is required for stability with the current members and growth of key new members. It is what will keep the others from leaving.
If that was the intent of the article, then it was a complete and utter failure, and whoever is developing this "stratgey" to force UT's hand (as you keep suggesting) has made another huge blunder. As you can see, most everyone is focusing on the comments about Beebe, and not on the equity issues.
What the article said about Beebe was quite accusatory, and those comments cannot be swept away. The comments from the "sources" basically blame him for the NU departure and other inappropriate activity (fixing the meeting agendas in UT's failure). If those things are really true, the university presidents (including Boren and Loftin) look like idiots for not firing him. And if they don't fire him should the new reformed Big 12 survive, they'll look even worse. Every president is going to get questioned about those accusations.