A thought on Barnett
- Thread starter snowcraig2.0
- Start date
Against FBS teams, one of our QB's has 8 turnovers in 3 games (over 2+ per game). The other QB has 2 turnovers in two games, both against ranked teams.
One of our QB's had a -0.7 ypc average against Tulsa, a 2.9 ypc average against Iowa, and a 1.0 ypc average against TT. The other QB had a 3.3 ypc average against TCU and a 4.4 ypc average against KSU.
One of our QB's is 0-5 as a starter against Big 12 competition, the other QB is 4-3 with all three losses against ranked teams, and two on the road.
If you don't understand why one QB is now starting, your football IQ is pretty low. Wail all you want about arm strength.
I agree. I rewatched weach play,and JB did better than it felt at the game. Sometimes our receivers do not make very good attemots at catching the ball. I would like to see more diving for the ball.
JB had more time to throw than SJ happy feet did. He is a bigger threat to defenses IMO. I remain surprised at how poor we run the ball. Last year we had more long runs.
I only brought up brees as an example of a guy who does a great job of moving in the pocket to create throwing lanes. Short qbs have a definite disadvantage, but the few who are successful have to do just that.
The fact that u say bus arm strength is fine clearly shows how little u know....his arm strength is attrocious. His own coach even said he can't make all the throws!!
Ouch. There's the one advantage of the iPhone over the GSIII, it doesn't autocorrect Rosenfels to Rosenberg.
After he threw the interception on Saturday, he played like a guy who knew he had competition behind him. Whether or not CPR would have pulled him, I don't know, but I doubt it. However, what I saw was a player who was content with throwing the ball at people's feet rather than taking a shot downfield. This approach is fine in the first three quarters, but when it came time to make a play he was still playing very tentatively.
His arm strength isn't great, but its good enough to win games in the big 12. It's equally as good as collin kleins. JB doesn't throw the ball with near the velocity of steele, but he gets rid of the ball on time and makes better decisons. With a little more work he can continue to win us games.
Except for the fact that JB led the team on a 13 play, 75 yard touchdown drive into the 4thQ that included completions of 10 yards to Horne, 27 yards to Horne, 9 yards to Young, 12 yards to Johnson, and 4 yards to Horne......well, yea, ignoring those facts, you might be right.
Forget the positives
The choosing-sides aspect among fanbase of this QB competition has ended up as nitpicking. Player A isn't good enough at (X), but the counterpoint is he's better than (B) at that but worse at (Y) and so on.
So what happens is, examples such as yours are downplayed in favor of pointing out the flaws (and it's that way with both Jantz & Barnett).
In all 3 touchdown drives vs. KSU, the offense looked well-oiled. It was fun to watch.
We simply need more of those each game.
Part of it's QB consistency & effectiveness, as well as minimizing penalties and turnovers, good line play, effective rushing game, dependability of receivers, getting first downs, good punting/field position when needed, confidence with placekicker and game plan that plays to ISU's strengths and can best exploit opponent's shortcomings (each adapted to specific opponent when necessary).
That's a lot of Stuff.
If all of that comes together better under one QB than another one, you go with that player as the starter.
Edit: Red zone efficiency, too.
Last edited:
One of our QB's played most of the A&M game last year, so you can add that loss to his column.
One of our QB's couldn't beat out the other QB in 2 training camps and essentially a bowl preparation. Do the coaches have a low football IQ?
And we beat 3 of the 4 worst defenses in the league last year. It's not like our offense was some juggarnaut.
One of our QB's is 6-0 in non-conference games (which count, by the way), including 2-0 against Iowa, a defense ranked above the defenses we beat in conference a season ago.
Put me in the low Football IQ category also - I understand why one of the QB's is starting/playing a lot right now, but I don't fully understand why the other one isn't playing some too.
I don't think alot of the throws at the ankles are due to poor arm strength. I think he's coached that way to throw it low so as to avoid tipped ball interceptions. Especially againt K-state. They have made a huge living off of tipped ball interceptions against other teams. Very smart on the part of our coaching staff IMO.
I guess to me, arm strength was the last thing I thought was causing his struggles Saturday.
Much like Steele, I think the majority of his problem lies in his cranial cavity.
Much like Steele, I think the majority of his problem lies in his cranial cavity.
Last edited:
Even though his completion rate was similar to TCU game, I thought our receivers caught more of those ankle throws against TCU than they did against KSU. I guess missing low is less dangerous, but even if you get a fabulous catch, you aren't getting any yards after catch.
Don't ever talk of Jantz again. He's awful and that's the reason he doesn't play anymore.
Good news for this offense--> its gets to play 2 of the worst defenses in the country in the next 2 weeks. Since JB likes to feast on poor defenses then woohoo, I look forward to being 6-2.
Just like SJ did? I think a kid is talented or he isn't at this level. Tebow has unlimited resources and he's never going to be mistaken for a QB.
