BREAKING: Prohm notches first commitment

SpokaneCY

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
13,294
8,489
113
Spokane, WA
I don't see a big difference in getting a JUCO like Edozie (no offers except Minnesota who then pulled it) then getting a kid like Ernst who had some mid major offers and will either contribute or transfer out after a couple years IMO

Not everyone can and will play meaningful minutes on ANY team. But EVERY player has a chance to be a major contributor in so many other ways that impact success.
 

baagoe

Well-Known Member
Mar 27, 2015
4,596
4,477
113
Guys been a cyclone for a day and we're already discussing him transferring. Ok.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,923
12,722
113
My point is that it's unlikely the play we get from him is very good.


We could literally sign a 4'5 dude from India and 80% of posters would be ecstatic.

The staff isn't infallible and acting like every commit is a slam dunk is just not my thing.

If this kid committed to Iowa this board would have a field day.

You don't know what literally means. Cool.
 

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,503
14,380
113
IMO, we have the scholarship to give. We may just need a big body to put out there at some point. Ernst has some skills. Likely that the ACL injury held back his recruitment. Definite mid-major guy. Maybe a bit of a reach. But another big body may be needed this coming season. Don't have a problem with using a scholly at this point. We will have a lot of holes to fill next year. Not sure where we stand on prospects. Better off to see what develops than bash a young man who just committed to us. Give him a chance.
 

Cydkar

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
26,923
12,722
113
I'd rather bank the scholarship and use it on a player who is better. If you want a body for practice get a walkon.

Use it on an extra JUCO next year. Use it on a mid year transfer. Get another talented, P5 high school kid. Remain flexible. That's how Hoiberg did things and everyone agreed it was the best way to do things.

It's not a big deal though, no.

We are going to have more scholarships than you can shake a stick at even with Brady on the roster.
 

ribsnwhiskey

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 6, 2009
9,082
4,306
113
80246
Guys been a cyclone for a day and we're already discussing him transferring. Ok.

That is probably the most pathetic thing about this thread. But to be fair, it is really only one guy who is talking out of his ***. The majority of us seem to be on board with this kid.
 

Dryburn

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2006
10,033
517
113
Somewhere in the U.S.
I'd rather bank the scholarship and use it on a player who is better. If you want a body for practice get a walkon.

Use it on an extra JUCO next year. Use it on a mid year transfer. Get another talented, P5 high school kid. Remain flexible. That's how Hoiberg did things and everyone agreed it was the best way to do things.

It's not a big deal though, no.

This, and your other posts shows why you are not a coach, or why undoubtedly no one on the face of the earth is asking you for your opinion on recruiting matters or how best to develop a Division I men's basketball team.

Scholarships are for one year. Period. If he doesn't work out......sit him down at the end of the season and explain it to him, and find a better place for him. ISU needs some help this year after losing Williams. Obviously, the coaches here,( who I would bet $100 know more about basketball talent and player potential than you ever could) feel he can contribute. End of discussion.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
That is probably the most pathetic thing about this thread. But to be fair, it is really only one guy who is talking out of his ***. The majority of us seem to be on board with this kid.

Yes, and IICRC he did the same thing when Noskowiak committed.

He threw a huge fit over that too. He doesn't seem to get that it's unrealistic to land 7-8 top 100 HS kids or immediate grad transfers in the next 12 months.
 

CloniesForLife

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 22, 2015
15,615
21,025
113
Yes, and IICRC he did the same thing when Noskowiak committed.

He threw a huge fit over that too. He doesn't seem to get that it's unrealistic to land 7-8 top 100 HS kids or immediate grad transfers in the next 12 months.

Agreed, we are going to have a lot of open scholarships and although we will bring in talent it will be hard to fill all of those with highly rated recruits. We aren't Kentucky, Duke, etc. Plus, wasn't Noskowiak a top 100 recruit?
 

CloniesForLife

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 22, 2015
15,615
21,025
113
I'd rather bank the scholarship and use it on a player who is better. If you want a body for practice get a walkon.

Use it on an extra JUCO next year. Use it on a mid year transfer. Get another talented, P5 high school kid. Remain flexible. That's how Hoiberg did things and everyone agreed it was the best way to do things.

It's not a big deal though, no.

We all still like what Hoiberg did and Prohm has said he is going to do those same things but we also have a unique situation where we have a lot of open scholarships and flexibility and could use insurance at the post.
 

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
Godfrey would have been really good if his head was on straight. Not sure you can lump Okoro (a great kid with very little talent), in with Godfry (talented kid who didn't take the game seriously) in together.

But your point stands, that everyone has to bring in some head scratchers, and it's foolish to think we're going to land over 5 really good contributors next year.

Not to mention the "mid-major" Iowa talent we passed on that wern't so "mid" (McDermott, Tuttle, Korver etc.). Kid could be really special or a bust that transfers out. Either way he helps the team this year and it is no real risk. This is exactly the time to roll the dice on a kid like this. It's like gambling with house money.
 

ribsnwhiskey

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 6, 2009
9,082
4,306
113
80246
Yes, and IICRC he did the same thing when Noskowiak committed.

He threw a huge fit over that too. He doesn't seem to get that it's unrealistic to land 7-8 top 100 HS kids or immediate grad transfers in the next 12 months.

I really don't understand it. Having an opinion is fine, but when you have never seen a kid play, he's been injured for the last year, he fills a hole for us and seems to have some pretty good athleticism, you would think "wait and see" before judging he is terrible and the first sign of the apocalypse. Some people just don't get it.
 

Malone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 7, 2010
2,923
5,355
113
Des Moines
He looks better than most of the (completely inept) bigs LE (Schaper, Skoglund, on and on) and McDoormat (Cory Johnson, Mann, Pomlee, Vette) recruited. I'll take it.
 

Bigman38

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jul 27, 2010
20,237
20,394
113
38
Council Bluffs, IA
I really don't understand it. Having an opinion is fine, but when you have never seen a kid play, he's been injured for the last year, he fills a hole for us and seems to have some pretty good athleticism, you would think "wait and see" before judging he is terrible and the first sign of the apocalypse. Some people just don't get it.

are you suggesting the scouting sites haven't seen him play? My bball opinion is pretty meaningless but I wouldn't say that about outfits like rivals and scout.

If this is just a reach to fill a roster spot because of limited options caused by the coaching change, it's ok. If this is the norm it's a problem, which has yet to be seen. I'll wait and see how Prohm's recruiting plays out in the next year.
 

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
You don't know what literally means. Cool.
Well he should have clarified it depends on if the dude has some special talent. Minnesota used one of their scholarships for jugglers for their pregam warm up act. Figuring he you can't play 13 guys may as well have a dude that can ride a unicycle and juggle.
So to confirm his literally was in fact literal, I would be cool with using one on a 4'5 kid from India that could make a half court shot 30% of the time or was best friends with a 7'4 Indian that looked like shaq. I mean I'd take a juggler on a unicycle too but we are better than the goofers so he better be juggling fire sticks or grenades or something if we are going that route.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
He looks better than most of the (completely inept) bigs LE (Schaper, Skoglund, on and on) and McDoormat (Cory Johnson, Mann, Pomlee, Vette) recruited. I'll take it.

Agreed. On a project big man, you look how he moves his feet, can he jump, can he catch the ball. From his videos, it looks like he can do all three things so there is a chance he could be much better than a lot of people think.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
are you suggesting the scouting sites haven't seen him play? My bball opinion is pretty meaningless but I wouldn't say that about outfits like rivals and scout.

If this is just a reach to fill a roster spot because of limited options caused by the coaching change, it's ok. If this is the norm it's a problem, which has yet to be seen. I'll wait and see how Prohm's recruiting plays out in the next year.

No one is saying it isn't a reach. You have to reach when you have 2-3 open scholarships at the end of June, plus at least 4-5 more coming open next year.

But it's pointless to cry about it.