Re: Good Read
Not sure how adding 1 more conference game all of a sudden makes the schedule boring. I would rather have another conference game than anon-con game against UNI or Toledo. I also use the term conferences loosely. Maybe a better term is divisions, that are reshuffled every 2 years to maintain competative balance. The divisions would be geographically based, so ISU's road games might be Minnesota, Nebraska, Mizzou, Iowa or Northwestern. I would also see an end to conference TV contracts for FB. Have a single contact with different networks and the money is split evenly, with a bonus going to Nationally televised gams.
As a fan, this just seems incredibly boring to me. It'd be basically the same schedule every year with 10 conference games, two creampuffs or rivalry games. Determining at large bids would be more impossible than it already is. I'd love to see 16 team conferences, division champs determined in an 8 team round robin, 1 cross division game, 1 required game against another power conference team, 1 rivalry game, and 2 more games to schedule as desired. It's sad to me that as it currently stands, ISU will never play a power 5 team from a neighboring state ever again.
Not sure how adding 1 more conference game all of a sudden makes the schedule boring. I would rather have another conference game than anon-con game against UNI or Toledo. I also use the term conferences loosely. Maybe a better term is divisions, that are reshuffled every 2 years to maintain competative balance. The divisions would be geographically based, so ISU's road games might be Minnesota, Nebraska, Mizzou, Iowa or Northwestern. I would also see an end to conference TV contracts for FB. Have a single contact with different networks and the money is split evenly, with a bonus going to Nationally televised gams.
Last edited: