Why does the story lose all credibility right there? The story simply states "It was one example of what multiple sources described as a pattern of “nickel and diming†of the men’s basketball program by the ISU athletic department and athletic director Jamie Pollard in the final years before Fred Hoiberg left to coach the Chicago Bulls in June." Isn't Micah Byers an employee of the Athletic Department? It doesn't say anything about the hotel decision being made by Pollard directly. IF in fact the Director of basketball Operations is being given the ultimate voting decision on whether or not the University will be on the hook for "an extra" night of hotel costs, I would assume that he knows and has been given some general input from Pollard and his directs about their opinion on such decisions.If Travis had put some names behind the information he was trying to present as factual it would be a lot easier to believe but when you start your story off about a hotel situation in Hawaii and the AD says that he's never dealt with travel accommodations and that was Micah Byers area right there the story loses all credibility.