Mitrou-Long Out Rest of Season

Status
Not open for further replies.

mac4cy

Active Member
Jul 16, 2009
890
32
28
45
Urbandale
Re: Long Out Rest of Season

The conspiracy theorist in me thinks this was the plan all along. Get as much from Naz as they could before Burton was eligible.

I thought the same thing. I heard that if he played in the 9th game he wouldn't get a medical redshirt. Hence, sitting out Sunday. Prayers to him and a complete recovery. The dude can ball and is a great ambassador for Iowa State.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
I am absolutely not trolling. I think alot of people on this board fail to understand how chemistry impacts performance. I sincerely hope I am wrong but I think 11-2 non-conference and 11-7 conference is very realistic.

It's not like he's transferring or he died. He'll still be with the team at all games and vocal on the bench.

Is this whole situation a great thing? Absolutely not, but at long as everyone stays healthy this year I don't think it impacts our team that much this season and improves our squad next year
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
There are different theories on the Ark Pine-Bluff game. (1) It was a let down spit and the team was just going through the motions or (2) The team looked really bad without Naz regardless if it was a letdown spot or not. Michigan State beat that team by 46 points. Everyone wanted to say originally that Ark- Pine Bluff game could be ignored because Naz will be back. Well now he won't be. I sincerely hope I'm wrong and you can look at my posting history, usually a glass half full guy, but I stand by the 22-9 prediction and two days ago I would have said 26-5.

We only beat a 2-8 Southern team by 10 the Sunday after the Iowa game last year and guess who started that game?
 

clone52

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2006
8,326
4,467
113
I wonder what Jackson is thinking about all of this? If Morris and Naz end up being back, that backcourt is pretty full for an elite JUCO.

Not terribly full. You'd have Morris, Jackson, Long, Thomas and Cooke rotating between the 1-3 positions most likely.
 

clone52

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2006
8,326
4,467
113
But due to needing to stay in games, I think our starters( who have been criticized for lack of defense lately) have partly struggled because of not wanting to get in early foul trouble. Tough to turn up the defense and worry about early fouls at the same time.

Our defensive problems against APB were to being too aggressive, not from trying to stay out of foul trouble. If they wanted to stay out of foul trouble, they would just sag off and the back door layups would not have happened. The problem was, we got quite a few steals early, then everyone was overplaying the passing lanes and weren't zoned in enough to do that and prevent the backdoor cuts.
 

Nycclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 24, 2010
1,324
564
113
45
i don't really doubt the 22-9. Def realistic. What I do doubt is losing to a uni team that was just pasted by double digits by two mid majors on the road that plays four guards is a likely outcome on Saturday.

There are different theories on the Ark Pine-Bluff game. (1) It was a let down spit and the team was just going through the motions or (2) The team looked really bad without Naz regardless if it was a letdown spot or not. Michigan State beat that team by 46 points. Everyone wanted to say originally that Ark- Pine Bluff game could be ignored because Naz will be back. Well now he won't be. I sincerely hope I'm wrong and you can look at my posting history, usually a glass half full guy, but I stand by the 22-9 prediction and two days ago I would have said 26-5.
 

clone52

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2006
8,326
4,467
113
i don't really doubt the 22-9. Def realistic. What I do doubt is losing to a uni team that was just pasted by double digits by two mid majors on the road that plays four guards is a likely outcome on Saturday.

Its a possibility, but its not "likely".
 

Cynonymous

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2015
1,473
358
83
Not terribly full. You'd have Morris, Jackson, Long, Thomas and Cooke rotating between the 1-3 positions most likely.
Very full
1 Morris
2 Jackson
3 Thomas
4 Cooke
5 Mitrou-Long
6 Jakolby Long
7 Nick Babb
 

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
Would naz take our last scholarship available for next year assuming no players transfer or leaves early? I'd be alright with it but a freshman or sophomore would need to step up big

Scholarship limit is 13.

Seniors:
1. Burton
2. Mitrou-Long
3. Thomas

Juniors:
4. Cooke
5. Jackson
6. Malou

Sophomores:
7. Babb
8. Carter
9. Ernst

Freshmen:
10. Lard
11. Long
12. Young

Wild cards:
13. Ashton
14. Morris


I think most assume in this scenario that Ashton would drop back to walk-on status to keep us under the limit. But I also think that the coaches must realize a juco/grad transfer who can play the 5 is critical for this team. If they want to add one of those, either Morris has to go pro (which I think is likely) or somebody else on this list has to go. The other alternative is to hope Carter and/or Ernst really develop before next November and hope that Lard can give quality minutes.
 

TheHelgo

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2006
3,714
1,338
113
Probably because he knew we needed him until Burton was eligible

Pretty big gamble for the entire season IMO if this was the case. Which is more important - a couple extra wins during the nonconference season, or being full strength for the conference season/conference tournament/ncaa tournament grind? I think the answer is pretty obvious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.