Love it. Truth is both are great players. I take Niang because of his leadership, clutch-factor, versatility, and what he means to the fanbase. Jok, while having grown a lot, is not as good at Matt Thomas in terms of defender. He may have more steals, but I highly doubt that Jok could put up the kind of defensive effort Matt did against Hield.
Someone earlier made a statement that opposing teams only have to prepare for Uthoff, while Niang has a supporting cast to make him look better. You are fooling yourself if you don't think that Niang is the number one player prepared for by ISU opposing teams. That is why he is so good. Stop him in the post, watch him turn into a guard. Play easy on the perimeter, watch him outplay your posts. Did you know he use to play with Nerlans Noel?
ISU is the better team in my opinion, because of the versatility and ability to score. I think there is no question on who is the more talented supporting cast. ISU runs into trouble with depth. If Naz were healthy, I don't think there would be a question as to which was the better team. Depth is what is really hurting ISU right now. ISU has also played lackluster defense against the front portion of the b12 slate. I think the lack of defensive effort can be attributed to depth concerns. But Iowa wins that category for sure.