Social Media Ban Necessary?

Social Media Ban for players until April?

  • Yes

    Votes: 42 41.6%
  • No

    Votes: 59 58.4%

  • Total voters
    101
  • Poll closed .

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,392
39,502
113
how about we make them think certain ways as well...maybe monitor their television, web surfing, thinking...daily actions, movements...rename Ames to Oceania and call it good.

FFS, it's pretty simple...let the "kids" know when the step on campus that their social media actions, much like those actions that are much more egregious in nature, have consequences. Carefully spell out said consequences, illustrate through example how they manifest, and move on.

Here's the thing though...the players already do this. They don't tweet bad things. They don't post instagram pictures doing stupid ****.

The only one that has any trouble with it is Jameel. And the stuff he is posting shouldn't be a problem with anyone but his teammates and coaches. Should we be bothered by the fact that on ONE night, Jameel was sick of Ames? Nope. Not any of our business. I, myself, am sometimes sick of Des Moines. Does it affect me if Jameel says he was suspended for 1 game. Nope, not at all.

Jameel's problem is with his coaches and maybe his teammates. He'd have the same attitude with them, social media ban or not. It's his attitude that is the problem. Not his twitter account.
 

Farnsworth

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
17,368
5,864
113
Des Moines, IA
I think they have this. It's right after "Out of Touch Fan Interpretation of Athlete Social Media 101" at the Learning Annex on Tuesday nights.

Haha I'd actually love to sit in on this! I actually want to know what they say about message boards and the likes. Mainly over reacting out of touch fans who represent a small percentage, but come across as the vocal majority.
 

cyclonestans

Active Member
Dec 20, 2013
395
326
43
Iowa
Am I missing something here? I thought GTO was the only person who could do poll threads...anyway vote no let be kids be kids. If they have to learn from mistakes, well that's life
 

Dryburn

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2006
10,033
517
113
Somewhere in the U.S.
I say no, but coaches have to have serious talks with the pitfalls of using such media. Players have to know to be careful what the say because it can be misunderstood or can cause problems.

But, I think the coaches need to let the players know they trust them and expect them to handle this responsibly.
 

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
35,682
31,830
113
Well I'm no social media genius. But I'm pretty sure posting 1game wasn't a bright idea.
 

Spanky

Well-Known Member
Oct 14, 2009
3,323
3,947
113
If he keeps Tweeting, he'll surely shoot himself in the foot again.
He's just not very good at it.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,309
27,993
113
Dez Moy Nez
How can it be unconstitutional to ban their media rights? You can tell them whatever the hell you want, or they aren't going to play. What does social media have over eating ice cream?
 

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
How can it be unconstitutional to ban their media rights? You can tell them whatever the hell you want, or they aren't going to play. What does social media have over eating ice cream?

Perhaps clicking either of the two links in my post that suggested it might be unconstitutional would answer your question.

The 1st Amendment generally prohibits the government from telling you what you can and can't say or where you can say it. A public university banning Twitter could run afoul of that.

Until the amendment passes that prevents the government from banning ice cream, your last question is dumb.
 

mattyice

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2011
1,811
527
63
51
And miss the opportunity for a player to tell its fan base to suck a fat one??

No way.
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,309
27,993
113
Dez Moy Nez
Perhaps clicking either of the two links in my post that suggested it might be unconstitutional would answer your question.

The 1st Amendment generally prohibits the government from telling you what you can and can't say or where you can say it. A public university banning Twitter could run afoul of that.

Until the amendment passes that prevents the government from banning ice cream, your last question is dumb.

The last question was completely relevant. A coach can tell a player he can't eat ice cream to lose weight. He eats ice cream; he isn't playing. How is that different than twitter? You can be a loud mouth idiot on any media. How is this even a question? What's next, coaches can't bench players for talking back because it violates their free speech?
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
Why do some of my constitutional rights get suspended when I am taking an exam at a public university?
 

baagoe

Well-Known Member
Mar 27, 2015
4,596
4,477
113
Well I'm no social media genius. But I'm pretty sure posting 1game wasn't a bright idea.
While it was dumb, he also talked to the Ames Tribune so a ban wouldn't have done anything in that situation.
 

Gossamer

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2014
1,621
1,565
113
Here's the thing though...the players already do this. They don't tweet bad things. They don't post instagram pictures doing stupid ****.

The only one that has any trouble with it is Jameel. And the stuff he is posting shouldn't be a problem with anyone but his teammates and coaches. Should we be bothered by the fact that on ONE night, Jameel was sick of Ames? Nope. Not any of our business. I, myself, am sometimes sick of Des Moines. Does it affect me if Jameel says he was suspended for 1 game. Nope, not at all.

Jameel's problem is with his coaches and maybe his teammates. He'd have the same attitude with them, social media ban or not. It's his attitude that is the problem. Not his twitter account.

you do know I was being facetious in my opening comments.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron