NOW isn't the time! Not this time.

SCyclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,475
12,233
113
Fort Dodge, IA
They might not be horrible, but they do have a losing record in conference. They are they type of team we are supposed to sweep. Splitting with teams that aren't horrible doesn't do us any good, and it doesn't matter how many game out of first 6th place is, it's still 6th place out of 10. That's not good.

While I'm not as willing to throw these guys under the bus, I do agree with this. If we want to be a blueblood (ok, tuco, just stifle) then yes, we do need to sweep teams like TT. And OSU, and KSU, etc.

We're not there yet - we have 5 or 6 guys trying like hell to win games when they're outnumbered and dog-tired.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,166
35,734
113
Just statistics.

Lol...OK. Just because there is something unquantifiable about the outcome of close games doesn't mean it is always just luck. Sometimes yes. But I have watched enough sports to know that there are some teams that perform well or poorly in the clutch. Calling it "luck" is ******** IMO.
 

CyJack13

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2010
12,666
1,665
113
Lol...OK. Just because there is something unquantifiable about the outcome of close games doesn't mean it is always just luck. Sometimes yes. But I have watched enough sports to know that there are some teams that perform well or poorly in the clutch. Calling it "luck" is ******** IMO.

Then why doesn't "clutchness" follow players or coaches? If it was really something more than luck you would see certain teams consistently ranked high in that category, meaning they excelled in close games. What happened to guys like Niang and Monte who were part of that team that was great in close games two years ago but has struggled this year, did they suddenly lose their "clutch" gene?
 

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
So your "Let's all support the team" mantra doesn't apply to McKay?

I believe my thread referred to "last night was not the time" because its easy to jump on a team when they're down, who I think gave it their all. No, I don't support his actions/whining that lead to the suspension, because that's what some fans do when things don't go their way. Let's all attack the coach and the players, I'm sure that will make everyone more happy. Of course, I support him stepping up, learning from his mistakes, and hope he's returning to being a good teammate.
 

Jacktronic

MONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAYSUNDAY
Dec 16, 2013
3,285
2,285
113
41
Kansas City, MO
Lol...OK. Just because there is something unquantifiable about the outcome of close games doesn't mean it is always just luck. Sometimes yes. But I have watched enough sports to know that there are some teams that perform well or poorly in the clutch. Calling it "luck" is ******** IMO.

You really think that the idea of a "clutch gene" is more plausible?
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,166
35,734
113
Then why doesn't "clutchness" follow players or coaches? If it was really something more than luck you would see certain teams consistently ranked high in that category, meaning they excelled in close games. What happened to guys like Niang and Monte who were part of that team that was great in close games two years ago but has struggled this year, did they suddenly lose their "clutch" gene?

Yes, I have heard this same debate before numerous times. Guys don't really get in the zone, confidence of a team has nothing to do with it, its all just "luck". When a team gets hot it's just like getting hot at the craps table. Sorry, I don't buy that. It's a game played by people, and there are tons of factors that go in to how people or a person plays on any given night and any given situation that aren't quantifiable but are more than just luck.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
McKay wouldn't have won this game for us.

The he team is trying. They are tired and make stupid mistakes.

If we had the same McKay that played against A&M I think we win last night. Just my opinion
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,166
35,734
113
You really think that the idea of a "clutch gene" is more plausible?

I'd didn't say anything about a clutch gene. Where are you guys getting this. Just point me to the source material so I can read it.
 

MakeItRain

New Member
Feb 3, 2016
19
0
1
While I'm not as willing to throw these guys under the bus, I do agree with this. If we want to be a blueblood (ok, tuco, just stifle) then yes, we do need to sweep teams like TT. And OSU, and KSU, etc.

We're not there yet - we have 5 or 6 guys trying like hell to win games when they're outnumbered and dog-tired.

Lol good grief. Just stop with this nonsense.
 

Jacktronic

MONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAYSUNDAY
Dec 16, 2013
3,285
2,285
113
41
Kansas City, MO
Yes, I have heard this same debate before numerous times. Guys don't really get in the zone, confidence of a team has nothing to do with it, its all just "luck". When a team gets hot it's just like getting hot at the craps table. Sorry, I don't buy that. It's a game played by people, and there are tons of factors that go in to how people or a person plays on any given night and any given situation that aren't quantifiable but are more than just luck.

You're too hung up on the use of the word Luck. Use a different word there if you prefer. It's just the term he used to explain the deviation in expected vs actual outcome. We are losing a lot of close games that in years past we won. That is all I was presenting, you seem to be taking it as I'm saying our losses are from some sort of "bad luck".
 

Clones8686

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2015
869
686
93
Yes, I have heard this same debate before numerous times. Guys don't really get in the zone, confidence of a team has nothing to do with it, its all just "luck". When a team gets hot it's just like getting hot at the craps table. Sorry, I don't buy that. It's a game played by people, and there are tons of factors that go in to how people or a person plays on any given night and any given situation that aren't quantifiable but are more than just luck.

You don't have to buy it, there are hundreds of DI teams that play dozens of games a season and for almost a couple decades those games have been closely charted and it is statistically proven that end game scenarios are essentially a crap shoot. You can argue til the cows come home, but I'm going to trust the numbers over your gut feeling.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,166
35,734
113
You're too hung up on the use of the word Luck. Use a different word there if you prefer. It's just the term he used to explain the deviation in expected vs actual outcome. We are losing a lot of close games that in years past we won. That is all I was presenting, you seem to be taking it as I'm saying our losses are from some sort of "bad luck".

Yeah, I am getting hung up on the word luck. To me it insinuates the outcome in close games is totally out of the teams control which I have a serious problem with.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,166
35,734
113
You don't have to buy it, there are hundreds of DI teams that play dozens of games a season and for almost a couple decades those games have been closely charted and it is statistically proven that end game scenarios are essentially a crap shoot. You can argue til the cows come home, but I'm going to trust the numbers over your gut feeling.

It has nothing to do with guts. These games are not played in a vacuum by a bunch of robots. Its not a science experiment with controlled variables. Sometimes a team does everything they can to win a game and the last shot doesn't fall, and sometimes, like last night, they make terrible decisions that result in the loss of a close game. Does luck play a role, sure. But to say it plays an equal role in every outcome is stupid.
 

MakeItRain

New Member
Feb 3, 2016
19
0
1
Did you read what I wrote? I said "if we WANT to be". We aren't there yet, by any stretch of the imagination......but if we WANT to be there, then that's what we have to do.

Yeah I did read it. The fact blue blood is even mentioned is ridiculous. Everyone wants to be a blue blood basketball program. Doesn't mean it's going to happen. I can't believe you're even mentioning it like it's in the realm of possibility. This was supposed to be THE TEAM for us. Instead they have been a disappointment and things are going to get much worse next year.

Occasionally teams like Iowa State can put together special seasons and possibly compete for a National Championship. Blue blood programs are in that National Title conversation most years. That's not, and never will be Iowa State or Iowa or UNI or a number of other very good basketball programs in this region who simply don't have the same advantages that those schools do.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron