Niang's 4th Foul

agcy68

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2007
2,551
784
113
78
Iowa
You know the one where he didn't touch the offensive player?

You know right about the time that ISU had cut the game to 7 and was rolling?

That 'foul' changed the course of the game. I would have really like to see what would have happened if Georges wasn't forced out of the game right there.
 

3TrueFans

Just a Happily Married Man
Sep 10, 2009
63,264
61,966
113
Ames
It was a very bad call, but the 14-1 run in the first 6 minutes before fouls were ever a concern is where the game turned, we never recovered from that.
 

Walden4Prez

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2014
4,192
3,937
113
It didn't impact the game. I don't know the real number...but we gave up 60 points in the paint? Many were barely contested? That is why we lost.
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
May 21, 2008
7,996
2,666
113
He was lucky not to have gotten called for a coupe of fouls too. But then again, he was unlucky on some fouls.

Anyway, even if we hadn't got that 4th foul, I doubt the result would be all that different. We were clearly the second best team. Hypothetical what ifs are about as imaginative as Hawk fans' hypothetical neutral court matchups against ISU.
 

SerenityNow

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2009
3,929
1,779
113
Central Iowa
We lost because Virginia is an outstanding team. We would have needed to be almost perfect to beat them. Some questionable calls, but we simply got beat by a very good team
 

CYEATHAWK

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2007
7,446
5,835
113
You are correct. And then when Gill rode him like a bronco the next possession without a whistle made it worse. However with that said, had Niang been called for some of what he did in the first half he may not of been in the game at that moment. Very inconsistent.
 

cyclones12321

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2009
8,258
1,772
113
38
Newton Ia
It didn't impact the game. I don't know the real number...but we gave up 60 points in the paint? Many were barely contested? That is why we lost.
Yes it did impact the game. Niang was our difference maker. They couldn't stop him and we were making a run. Officials took that into their own hands to stop us
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,634
23,892
113
Macomb, MI
It was a very bad call, but the 14-1 run in the first 6 minutes before fouls were ever a concern is where the game turned, we never recovered from that.

I think the fact that ISU had the game down to 7 when a phantom 4th foul was called would disagree with you. Yeah - that 14-1 run certainly didn't help matters, but down to 7 with momentum - and then the refs blow a call, Niang has to sit, and it immediately goes back to double digits.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,939
25,078
113
Absolutely it would have been nice to see the game without that call, but that's the life when you play without a bench. With the minutes these guys play you're gonna get called at some point.

Prohm's mission has to be to get 9 or 10 contributors in order to avoid this. We've been sensitive to foul calls all season because it affected us so much more than a team that can sit a starter and not have a huge dropoff.
 

CTTB78

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2006
9,540
4,518
113
Should have never been there. The two moving screen calls killed us.
 

BloodyBuddy

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2012
1,719
51
48
Awful call, he bumped him on the floor a bit, but nothing on the shot. These refs weren't the reason we lost, but with VA being red hot that first half the only chance we had was Niang doing what he did vs OU in the tourney. Refs robbed us of that chance. But we had other chances to cut it closer and didn't capitalize.