***Official Big 12 Expansion Thread '16***

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
I thought the B1G's goal was to poach Virginia and North Carolina after if they can raid the ACC (and not get ND).

Georgia Tech and UNC would be my guesses. Northern Virginia, where most of the population is, already gets BTN thanks to Maryland. GT adds Atlanta.
 

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,847
2,727
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
The only way ISU gets into the Big10 is if its in some combo with other schools and we are needed to fill out an odd number. For example, if they invite Kansas, Okie, and Texas, and need a fourth, ISU is probably on the top of all remaining choices if the SEC / ACC are locked up. (Assuming West Virgina gets the nod to the ACC)

Also, all this talk about Iowa not wanting ISU is not true. On that leaked tape from Gordon Gee from when he was at Ohio State, he made mention that the Iowa president was under tremendous pressure to get ISU into the Big10. Sounds like they got their marching orders from the regents.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: isu83

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
Also, all this talk about Iowa not wanting ISU is not true. On that leaked tape from Gordon Gee from when he was at Ohio State, he made mention that the Iowa president was under tremendous pressure to get ISU into the Big10. Sounds like they got their marching orders from the regents.

The problem is that Iowa has as much say in the B1G's internal workings as Iowa State does in the Big 12's.
 

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,847
2,727
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
The problem is that Iowa has as much say in the B1G's internal workings as Iowa State does in the Big 12's.
Exactly.

BUT when I hear that "The Hawkeyes will never allow Iowa State to be in the Big10" is pretty much an untrue rumor given the evidence otherwise.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: isu83

BeachAve

Well-Known Member
Apr 22, 2014
1,287
316
48
I don't really think anyone knows Oklahoma and Texas are looking. Maybe they are now because no one can agree who to add for expansion. Wouldn't blame them entirely. But the Big 12 is good for both Texas and Oklahoma.

As the Big 12 brass sees A&M and Nebraska leave -- with their 85k-95k seat stadium venues, and Bowlsby looking at dogs like Colorado St, Memphis , UCF, and other old WAC and conference USA as replacements????

And people here want to kick out Texas ?

You people are fricking out of your minds

Courting crappy potential new Big 12 members -- some who get 25,000 to a FB game, is fricking insane

Be careful what you wish for. You want TEXAS and OU to bail? Then keep entertaining these leftover 3rd tier FB schools
 

CyForPresident

Well-Known Member
Mar 28, 2006
8,335
3,138
113
38
Cornlands of Ayuxwa
If OU and UT leave and take 2 friends

Best of the Rest Conference

West
TCU
Baylor
BYU
Kansas
Kansas State
Iowa State

East
Cincy
West Virginia
UConn
Houston
Memphis
East Carolina

There are worse things in the world. We'd get to keep some historic rivals and might actually win some games. This is essentially the Big East plus Big 12. We can make that conference work IF we have too

Worst case scenario, we go back to our 2010 Big East merger plan that'd look similar to this. Football would actually win more and basketball would be insane. That might be a 8 bid league yearly for the NCAA tournament.

Might be less money in theory, but until it's bidded on, you never know. Netflix or a new market might pay up for a best of the rest conference
 

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,806
3,698
113
Menlo, Iowa
If I'm the B1G, I save the last two spots for Notre Dame & Pitt. If schools are forced to join a conference to qualify for a shot at a four team playoff...
They already are in a conference that has a long term GOR.
 

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,806
3,698
113
Menlo, Iowa
Like Notre Dame couldn't get out of it? & Pitt is one of their traditional rivals. A division of Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State, Penn State, Pitt, Maryland, & Rutgers may be a conference situation the Irish say "yes" to. Especially if cross-divisional games become purely optional and don't count towards your division record.

The ACC contract may need to be renegotiated when Texas joins as an affiliate/independent member anyways.

People expecting a B1G invite are living in fantasy land. Our academic standing won't count for ****.

Why is Pitt more attractive than ISU?

Everyone rips people for saying ISU to the Big 10 yet they put teams in the conference that not realistic.
 

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,806
3,698
113
Menlo, Iowa
Georgia Tech and UNC would be my guesses. Northern Virginia, where most of the population is, already gets BTN thanks to Maryland. GT adds Atlanta.


Its not about getting on cable anymore. That was the goal 5 years ago. The next step is streaming subscriptions. Again GT and UNC just signed a new GOR, they are not leaving the ACC.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,179
7,770
113
Dubuque
I'm not saying it would happen in the next ten years; what I'm saying is I wouldn't be surprised if the B1G would rather save those last two spots until Notre Dame was ready. What if the playoff doesn't expand? What if the super conferences divorce the NCAA?

It can't happen for the next 20 years. ACC schools and ND extended their GOR until 2036 when they announced the ACC TV Network with ESPN.

There has been speculation of a possible loophole to the ACC GOR if ESPN doesn't launch a linear ACC Network by 2019.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
Very telling that the ACC extended and the B12 isn't. It's been decided which of the P5 conferences won't make it.

I guess it makes sense that the one that is most central to the other 4 is the one that will be raided down the road.

I'm now going to root for Houston, BYU, Cincinnati and Memphis from here out since they will be our league mates in a few years.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,875
26,914
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Thought-experiment time, seeking feedback from those whose grasp of realignment reality is better than mine. Suppose there's no new GOR and no expansion at this time. How likely is it that only one of UT or OU would bolt at the end of current agreement, and not both? Would one school find it lucrative to be Big 12 kingpin if the other goes elsewhere?

I know many factors come into play that we can't predict — expansion to 8-team playoff, unexpected shakeups/expansions in other leagues, and so on. Just curious.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: cyclonestate

simply1

Rec Center HOF
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 10, 2009
45,919
34,664
113
Pdx
Thought-experiment time, seeking feedback from those whose grasp of realignment reality is better than mine. Suppose there's no new GOR and no expansion at this time. How likely is it that only one of UT or OU would bolt at the end of current agreement, and not both? Would one school find it lucrative to be Big 12 kingpin if the other goes elsewhere?

I know many factors come into play that we can't predict — expansion to 8-team playoff, unexpected shakeups/expansions in other leagues, and so on. Just curious.
Just off the top, the value of the conference would seem to be diminished quite a lot in that scenario. If one goes, and one stays, who else goes also.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,905
25,036
113
Thought-experiment time, seeking feedback from those whose grasp of realignment reality is better than mine. Suppose there's no new GOR and no expansion at this time. How likely is it that only one of UT or OU would bolt at the end of current agreement, and not both? Would one school find it lucrative to be Big 12 kingpin if the other goes elsewhere?

I know many factors come into play that we can't predict — expansion to 8-team playoff, unexpected shakeups/expansions in other leagues, and so on. Just curious.
Expanding the playoffs is a huge variable that could affect the Big12 tremendously. If there is an 8 team playoff then I think the possibility of UT and OU staying increases. But one will not stay without the other. ESPN is already doing what they can to show the Big12 as a lesser conference. If one of those two leave, it'll be tough for the other to keep the conference relevant.
 

everyyard

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 24, 2006
8,223
3,641
113
48
www.cyclonejerseys.com
We need to be talking to every P4 conference and hopefully have been for the last 5 years. Things are gonna start moving fast in next 4-5 years, maybe sooner.
 

HoopsTournament

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 12, 2006
7,844
4,983
113
53
St. Joseph, MO
www.hoopstournament.net
Very telling that the ACC extended and the B12 isn't. It's been decided which of the P5 conferences won't make it.

I guess it makes sense that the one that is most central to the other 4 is the one that will be raided down the road.

I'm now going to root for Houston, BYU, Cincinnati and Memphis from here out since they will be our league mates in a few years.
Pac 12 has not extended either, so don't lump them in with SEC, ACC and Big Ten
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron