Can the guy be anymore clueless? We play 9 guys total and 8 guys with big minutes and he says or bench is short. What a moron.
Some guys working a telecast with Davis last year talked about his locks and how they would likely fail. They called the picks/endorsement, the "Kiss of Seth".
Lets be fair the whole CBS crew today was flat out bad. During the game if you knew nothing about basketball you would have thought ISU played in some JUCO junk conference and Nevada played in the NBA.
This. I just listened to Seth mispronounce Naz's name.Most of these guys know very little outside the blue bloods. Listen to the podcast nerds if you want analysts that know every team. How did Davis even get his job? I guess he's a pretty good writer, but he should stay away from analysis.
He still failed to give ANY love for us beating his "for sure" 5-12 upset. These "experts" are just guys who get paid to give you what it's from different vantage points, but their guesses are no better than any of ours. After our game recap, he couldn't stop talking about how we "cant give up threes like we did." Seth, you were wrong, we controlled the game, swallow the damn crow already. He probably is one of the people who thinks Monte isn't a top 5 point guard in the NCAA
The knucklehead himself Charles Barkley seemed to be the only guy pointing out that Nevada probably only played a couple opponents that were similar to ISU's caliber all year.
He's so smug, yet always so off base. Can't tell if he's a really good troll or really stupid.
I think Sir Charles is generally pretty good with his comments.
Charles only follows college hoops a few weeks a year...but still can make better points than some of these guys who cover it year round. Plus he isn't obsessed with blue blood programs like the typical college hoops media guys.