Other analysts obsess over NBA talent on a team rather than the team as a whole, as evidenced by their Nevada picks.I love Barkley.
It's his skepticism of blue bloods that makes it possible for him to see what is actually happening on the floor. Far too many analysts never get past the ranking or seed number ahead of the name.
And those commercials with Samuel Jackson and Spike Lee are an absolute hoot. I always remember the one from last year where Jackson and Lee were thinking up a new nickname for Chuck - the best one was "The Round Mound of Sit-around".
I think ISU might have a couple NBA picks too.Other analysts obsess over NBA talent on a team rather than the team as a whole, as evidenced by their Nevada picks.
There were reasons to pick Nevada as a hot team, there really weren't many reasons to pick ISU to lay an egg. Senior team and probably hottest team in CBB or definitely top 3 hottest team.
When you have the crazy obvious Minn-MTSU matchup where MTSU was actually favored by Vegas...dude sucks at predicting basketball.
Go look st Seth Davis' bracket - .
Seth Davis had Nevada beating Purdue as well.
http://games.espn.com/tournament-challenge-bracket/2017/en/entry?entryID=17097022
Charles only follows college hoops a few weeks a year...but still can make better points than some of these guys who cover it year round. Plus he isn't obsessed with blue blood programs like the typical college hoops media guys.
I don't think Bilas ever picked Nevada. He has us in the S16.
i don't care what some talking head says about us. He hasn't watched us all year so his opinion is nothing that bothers me at all.
I will say this though.......did you ever think you would hear 'depth' and 'ISU Mens Basketball' in the same sentence. I remember a couple of those Johnny Orr teams that would go 6 deep, maybe.
The knucklehead himself Charles Barkley seemed to be the only guy pointing out that Nevada probably only played a couple opponents that were similar to ISU's caliber all year.