That team would be bananas.Egor's rebounding plus Juiston would be a nice upgrade on the boards.
Reload the backcourt the following year w/ Shayok and Moss plus Thompson upfront and the talent gap w/ KU is smaller than it's been in a long time.
That team would be bananas.Egor's rebounding plus Juiston would be a nice upgrade on the boards.
Reload the backcourt the following year w/ Shayok and Moss plus Thompson upfront and the talent gap w/ KU is smaller than it's been in a long time.
Prohm is just as good at going after transfers as Hoiberg.... Now can he close as good? Lets go baby.
Does Prohm's wife know about Mrs. Hoiberg's closing Sunday brunch? Fred may need to share those details.
It seems we're an underdog for each of the grad transfers. Given we don't have a lot of prior connections it's impressive to get in on 3 or 4 big time grad transfers.I would think OU has the upper hand for Egor since a former Rice assistant is on staff but the amount of guys we lose could help. Can't imagine they will have both( him and Brown) visit on the same days
I think it was his parents that made brunch. What was it, flapjacks?Does Prohm's wife know about Mrs. Hoiberg's closing Sunday brunch? Fred may need to share those details.
It was the I State toast that was the closer.Does Prohm's wife know about Mrs. Hoiberg's closing Sunday brunch? Fred may need to share those details.
I think Egor might be better than Brown or Alstork. Thoughts?
So Hines tweeted that he (Egor) will visit April 21st. That is the same day as Brown. They couldn't possibly want to take both of them could they? Otherwise that visit situation could be a bit odd.
It's a long shot but if we somehow miss out on Juiston, any chance we throw everything at these guys, bring in two of them and play small again? Or a better question would be, where do we go if our only serious big offer goes elsewhere? Another sit out guy? Take a reach on a lower regarded grad kid?
Tutors?Hopefully he knows the quality of women Hoiberg had lined up for them on Saturday night.... just kidding.... kind of.
I wonder if the staff has a hierarchy of wants, where things kind of fall into place once we get certain commits (or not)? As in, if guy A signs, we'll push for guy B rather than guy C, if that makes sense? I'd list my hierarchy, but I'm getting confused with all the names flying around.
I think we grab someone if we miss on Juiston, but it won't be in the mold of the Holden. We have that in Kasongo. I guessing there are more, but Johnson, Brooks, and Thornton are known names (although Johnson is a longshot swingman and he along with Brooks are not backup recruits). Thornton is Bowie like imo.It's a long shot but if we somehow miss out on Juiston, any chance we throw everything at these guys, bring in two of them and play small again? Or a better question would be, where do we go if our only serious big offer goes elsewhere? Another sit out guy? Take a reach on a lower regarded grad kid?
Kanter is going to XavierI think we grab someone if we miss on Juiston, but it won't be in the mold of the Holden. We have that in Kasongo. I guessing there are more, but Johnson, Brooks, and Thornton are known names (although Johnson is a longshot swingman and he along with Brooks are not backup recruits). Thornton is Bowie like imo.
And there will be more guys become available that may be easier to get as programs fill up on the premium wave. For example, KU is in on Kanter, but will they have a spot open if he pulls out of the draft last minute? There are even the Armardi and Dillon Brooks summer surprises.
That was just an example, but good catch. Has he withdrawn?Kanter is going to Xavier
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...vier-musketeers-exits-nba-draft-considerationThat was just an example, but good catch. Has he withdrawn?
Withdrawn from what? He committed to XavierThat was just an example, but good catch. Has he withdrawn?