I outlined this in the computer rankings thread, but I thought I would move some of the same evidence and expand upon the same over here.
Barttovik has a statistic called "PRPG!" on his (?) site. The number is similar to WAR from baseball for the value over a replacement player, but instead of your value in terms of wins over a 162 game season, it is your value in net points per game compared to a replacement college player (so think like a Long or a Beverly). A +1 means you add one point over replacement.
Here is a little tabulation of PRPG! for the eight men eligible this season (with the cardinal backgrounds) and the score for the four guys sitting out right now using their PRPG! for the past season (with the gold backgrounds). This is not to say these guys cannot improve this season relative to last year, but this is what we have right now...
View attachment 60342
For those of you who might say that the guys in gold above were "on a bad team," well, duh. Of course they were. Those four played a substantial number of minutes on that bad team, though, and they were not really playing that well compared to the hot start that the top four guys above and young Mr. Haliburton have us off to starting this season.
This is why I think the following...
-- Jacobson, Shayok, Nick, and THT are
not leaving the starting lineup anytime soon
-- Jacobson has been
really good... ample playing time is available to Lard as a second post starter or from the bench, but Mike might already be much better than him
-- Wigginton gets his starting spot back when healthy, but Haliburton is still going to see plenty of minutes as the first guard/wing off the bench
-- Haliburton has been very good, and considering he plays a similar position to Talley, Talley might be behind him in the rotation going forward
-- If we only go 7-8 deep, then Zoran might be the odd man out
-- Solomon has the most experience of anybody on the roster, but the talent level has increased so much that he is going to probably be a rotational guy
-- He seems to have the mentality to accept a bench role after starting two seasons, though
Their per 100 splits from this season for Mike and last year for Cameron...
CAMERON
View attachment 60343
MICHAEL
View attachment 60339
Jacobson has just been better so far.
-- not shown above, but Michael has a TS% of 72% versus 60% for Lard
-- Michael is a slightly better free throw shooter and has a higher % from the field
-- Lard has zero range, while Jacobson is shooting 40% from three
-- Jacobson is drawing nearly twice as many fouls
-- Lard does offer much more on the boards, though, and can be a nasty rim-protector if less fundamentally sound on positioning compared to Mike and Solo
-- much better efficiency ratings for Jacobson on both offense and defense
Not saying that Lard cannot do it, and obviously having two dominant big men with contrasting styles on the roster would be really nice, but Jacobson this year is better than Lard last year. Jacobson having an inside-outside game and offering no rim protection while Lard being so good on the offensive glass and lurking for the block makes them viable to play together against bigger lineups when we can do so, though I do not know if I trust either of them guarding a Shayok- or THT-type playing small-ball 4. Cameron is going to have to kill it or one of the guards/wings is going to have to hit a wall in the next few weeks to replace him.