That's not going to get rid of this virus though - not even a little bit. At best, it slows it down. How much can be argued, as if people aren't watching/attending a college athletics event, plenty will be attending other things with plenty of people in attendance.
If you're prepared to never see another Cyclone athletic event, surely you're prepared to never attend a job again/never go to a restaurant/never go anywhere to buy anything that's not life or death essential? Even all of that won't get rid of this virus - but if that's your goal, why stop at viewing (not even attending) athletic events?
To hell with all the people who depend on athletics for a living, to put food on the table for their kids. Should be plenty of other jobs for them with unemployment through the roof & hiring freezes all over the place, right? Hospitals have plenty of beds, plenty of ventilators.
Anybody want to figure up the risk of covid-related death for 30k people attending an event (even counting community spread) vs risk of death for 60k+ people driving to/from an athletic event pre-covid? If you can share facts that show the covid chance is higher, I'll change my opinion. If not, you should be advocating for no athletic events/concerts/large forms of entertainment - ever - since entertainment is not worth any amount of possible death (according to your own words).
In the case of SARS-CoV-2, evidence is growing that
superspreading is a hugely significant factor of total transmission.
In our study,
just 20 percent of cases, all of them involving social gatherings, accounted for an astonishing 80 percent of transmissions. (That, along with other things, suggests that the dispersion factor, k, of SARS-CoV-2 is about 0.45).
A study published in The Lancet in late April, based on data from Shenzhen, southern China, about suspected cases among travelers from around Wuhan, concluded that
80 percent of transmissions were caused by 8-9 percent of cases.
A recent preprint (not yet peer-reviewed) about 212 Covid-19 cases in Israel between late February and late April
traced 80 percent of the transmissions back to just 1-10 percent of cases.
With other coronaviruses like SARS and MERS as well, a small group of superspreaders was responsible for a large majority of all transmissions.
It stands to reason, too, that a
highly contagious person is more likely to spread the infection in a crowd (at a wedding, in a bar, during a sporting event) than in a small group (within their household), and when contact is extensive or repeated.
But the record in both places, and elsewhere, points to the same conclusion:
It’s not just that superspreading events are happening with SARS-CoV-2; they appear to be driving much of the pandemic.
The epidemic’s growth can be controlled with tactics far less disruptive, socially and economically, than the extended lockdowns or other extreme forms of social distancing that much of the world has experienced over the past few months.
Forget about maintaining — or, if infections resurge, resuming — sweeping measures designed to stem the virus’s spread in all forms.
Just focus on stopping the superspreading.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/opinion/coronavirus-superspreaders.html