Just a brief summary of Prohm's talent v results

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,005
3,120
113
West Virginia
I know there are a lot of threads piling on Prohm right now, maybe deserved, maybe not. The one thing I am realizing is that there has been a LOT of NBA players on ISU teams under Prohm.

---------------------
2015-2016 roster with NBA experience now: Morris, Niang, Nadler, Matt Thomas, Burton, Naz
Result: 10-8 in Big 12, Sweet 16, lose to Virginia

2016-2017 roster with NBA experience now: Morris, Thomas, Burton, Naz
Result: 12-6 in Big 12, Second round, lose to Purdue

2017-2018 roster with NBA experience now: None (Shayok was out due to transfer)
Result: 4-14 in Big 12

2018-2019 roster with NBA experience now: Shayok, Horton-Tucker, Halliburton
Result: 9-9 in Big 12, Lost NCAA first round to Ohio State

2019-2020 roster with NBA experience now: Halliburton
Result: 5-13 in Big 12
-------------------------

Obviously making 3 tournaments in 5 years is nothing to sneeze at, and winning two Big 12 tournaments in 5 years is also awesome. My point is only that some of these teams were kinda loaded with NBA talent. Not sure how many times ISU has had 7 NBA level players on a team. Many other players from these years are also playing professionally oversees as well.

Just food for thought.
"if you give a man a fish he's hungry in an hour. If you teach him to fish he'll become self sufficient". Meaning our current NBA talent may NOT have been NBA talent when they left, but left with the tools to learn how to become one. Those are kudos only a good mentor can provide.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: CycloneErik

isufbcurt

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2006
27,527
44,485
113
46
Newton
We had left Mad Fran for dead/pointed and laughed at his disaster of a program 2-3 years ago.

Now... he has a legitimate Big Ten and even national title contender.

Stuff can change so fast in basketball.

I agree with you our floor of sustained success, Prohm or not, is not as high as some people think. Even the accomplishments of the Orr, 90s, and Hoiberg eras (outside of the Fizer/Tinsley year) were modest.

You realize they are a one hit wonder right?
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,927
41,629
113
Waukee
You realize they are a one hit wonder right?

I think that supports my point rather than contradicting it.

One stud and everything changes in basketball.

Maybe that is Hunter or somebody we don't even know about yet.

Or maybe we're just going to keep on suckin'.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,489
25,936
113
Well, we’ve had one ignorant person raise their hand. Anyone elsewanba stand up on their chairs?

The tournament champ is the actual conference champion, the one that gets the automatic bid to the NCAA’s. Every conference gets their choice of the regular season or tourney winner was their official champion.

Guess which one the Big XII chose?
Sheesh. And there were people complaining in the football forum because we “only” finished alone atop the regular season standings.

Night-and-day from football. In the football Big 12 Championship you have to play for a right to even get into it. You don't even get to play unless you've established yourself as a top 2 team in the conference.

Basketball, it's 3 days in 3 games. Most teams have an idea whether they are in the NCAA tournament or not. Extreme variance of motivation to win. Nowhere near comparable.

If you want to base success on Big 12 Tournament titles go for it, I guess. Marginal results over the course of a 18 game conference schedule, little if any success in the NCAA tournament, multiple years at the bottom of the Big 12, dozens of 10+ point losses over the last year, but those Big 12 Tournament titles though!
 

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,637
79,944
113
DSM
You realize they are a one hit wonder right?

But what would you rather have (just speculating here:

2 tourney appearances in 5 years with a 2nd exit and an Elite 8...or

3 tourney appearances in 5 with a 1st round upset, a 2nd round exit, and a Sweet 16...or

1 tourney appearance in 5 years and it’s a Final Four
 

boone7247

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 15, 2011
3,018
941
113
Near the City
This is my CSP take.

Negative: Has recurite talent that has left early, ultimately hurting his teams because they are missing talent that was being counted on to solidify the team in the future. There for he underperforms his recruiting.

Positives: he cares about his players and ISU equally. He isn't Fran McCaffery. He can recruit talent.

With those things in mind I am willing to give him a longer leash.

A) This season is ****** because of COVID and would be a really ****** year to fire a coach and have a new coach coming in trying to keep current players (can't meet as much as neede) and recruit future players.

B) CSP has been able to compete when he gets upper classmen developed. They will be fine. This year is gonna suck, but more so because Haliburton turned into a stud (a great thing) than anything else. He should be a junior on this team, and how good would that team if you have him. CSP recruited that kid thinking he had a 4 year guy, who turned out to be a 2 year guy.

C)The cupboard isn't bear, they have some kids that can play this year. They have had small setbacks as far as practice abilities, as well as COVID to deal with a new squad. Let alone one of the better players on the team hasn't played a game yet. They will be better in February than they are now.

Everyone needs to step back and look at reality, Fred started something, in a landscape that was different than today, CSP was able to pick up and equal Fred's results, he has recruited excellent talent to the team. Also, if you fire him who are you hiring that is better?
 

DeereClone

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2009
8,281
9,648
113
This is my CSP take.

Negative: Has recurite talent that has left early, ultimately hurting his teams because they are missing talent that was being counted on to solidify the team in the future. There for he underperforms his recruiting.

Positives: he cares about his players and ISU equally. He isn't Fran McCaffery. He can recruit talent.

With those things in mind I am willing to give him a longer leash.

A) This season is ****** because of COVID and would be a really ****** year to fire a coach and have a new coach coming in trying to keep current players (can't meet as much as neede) and recruit future players.

B) CSP has been able to compete when he gets upper classmen developed. They will be fine. This year is gonna suck, but more so because Haliburton turned into a stud (a great thing) than anything else. He should be a junior on this team, and how good would that team if you have him. CSP recruited that kid thinking he had a 4 year guy, who turned out to be a 2 year guy.

C)The cupboard isn't bear, they have some kids that can play this year. They have had small setbacks as far as practice abilities, as well as COVID to deal with a new squad. Let alone one of the better players on the team hasn't played a game yet. They will be better in February than they are now.

Everyone needs to step back and look at reality, Fred started something, in a landscape that was different than today, CSP was able to pick up and equal Fred's results, he has recruited excellent talent to the team. Also, if you fire him who are you hiring that is better?

Going 10-8 his first year with all kinds of experience on a loaded roster was maybe the worst coach-job he has produced in his time here.
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,331
39,365
113
Going 10-8 his first year with all kinds of experience on a loaded roster was maybe the worst coach-job he has produced in his time here.

I’m not trying to defend him for his results but ******** about year 1 is crazy.

What were they in conference the previous year? 12-6. You’ll also note that a key part of that team was lost when Naz’s season ended.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanbr

coolerifyoudid

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2013
17,318
27,034
113
KC
But what would you rather have (just speculating here:

2 tourney appearances in 5 years with a 2nd exit and an Elite 8...or

3 tourney appearances in 5 with a 1st round upset, a 2nd round exit, and a Sweet 16...or

1 tourney appearance in 5 years and it’s a Final Four

This is actually harder to answer than I first thought. A Final Four or Elite 8 would be fun as hell, but I rarely remember who won the previous years March Madness, much less who made the Final Four (unless it was a big Loyola-type underdog).

I'm not sure if I'd take the trade-off of having one great year, knowing they'd be accompanied by 4 years of missing the tournament, even if that sounds pretty heavenly right now. I like having something to root for in the tournament every year. I pay more attention to other games looking for potential matchups.

Of course, never seeing us in a Final Four makes it easier to make that decision.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,244
7,141
113
My Playhouse
I can't argue with Prohm's recruiting......hell, he's probably had better success with it than Hoiberg did.

But I am really starting to wonder about his coaching. He talks endlessly about wanting to play defense, and yet.....you get what I'm saying.

Problem is when this defense practices against this offense, it actually looks elite.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,489
25,936
113
This is my CSP take.

Negative: Has recurite talent that has left early, ultimately hurting his teams because they are missing talent that was being counted on to solidify the team in the future. There for he underperforms his recruiting.

Positives: he cares about his players and ISU equally. He isn't Fran McCaffery. He can recruit talent.

With those things in mind I am willing to give him a longer leash.

A) This season is ****** because of COVID and would be a really ****** year to fire a coach and have a new coach coming in trying to keep current players (can't meet as much as neede) and recruit future players.

B) CSP has been able to compete when he gets upper classmen developed. They will be fine. This year is gonna suck, but more so because Haliburton turned into a stud (a great thing) than anything else. He should be a junior on this team, and how good would that team if you have him. CSP recruited that kid thinking he had a 4 year guy, who turned out to be a 2 year guy.

C)The cupboard isn't bear, they have some kids that can play this year. They have had small setbacks as far as practice abilities, as well as COVID to deal with a new squad. Let alone one of the better players on the team hasn't played a game yet. They will be better in February than they are now.

Everyone needs to step back and look at reality, Fred started something, in a landscape that was different than today, CSP was able to pick up and equal Fred's results, he has recruited excellent talent to the team. Also, if you fire him who are you hiring that is better?

Good post, but a few thoughts in response:

A) You mention him "being able to compete when he gets upper classmen developed". I guess I don't see any evidence of that. Who has he really developed into a successful upperclassmen? Any successful upperclassmen he's had he inherited. The other successful players have left after year 1 or 2.

B) This year isn't going to suck because Haliburton left. It's going to suck because of an absolute failure to develop talent. In my mind this isn't as much about the guys who left for the pros, it's about the inability to develop good program guys (i.e., Zion, Grill, TLew, Conditt, etc.)
 
Last edited:

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,637
79,944
113
DSM
I can't argue with Prohm's recruiting......hell, he's probably had better success with it than Hoiberg did.

But I am really starting to wonder about his coaching. He talks endlessly about wanting to play defense, and yet.....you get what I'm saying.

Our defense is not anywhere near aggressive enough and it’s way over complicated. Guys seem to be trying to get to where they’re told be rather than get to where they need to be. Playing good man defense is instinctual when it comes to creating turnovers and putting the other team in bad situations. And for this years team, Foster should be starting and patrolling the middle until he fouls out.
 

Halincandenza

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2018
9,434
10,262
113
Well, we’ve had one ignorant person raise their hand. Anyone elsewanba stand up on their chairs?

The tournament champ is the actual conference champion, the one that gets the automatic bid to the NCAA’s. Every conference gets their choice of the regular season or tourney winner was their official champion.

Guess which one the Big XII chose?
Sheesh. And there were people complaining in the football forum because we “only” finished alone atop the regular season standings.

No. On the freakin trophy it says tournament champion. On the regular trophy is says Big 12 Champion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arobb

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,462
19,624
113
I think this board is unbearable during basketball season. Prohm isn't going anywhere anytime soon. You all who want to make a new thread every time you get frustrated are just going to have to deal with it. This **** situation is as much a Jamie and Fred problem as a Steve problem. Controversial, I know.

We are way, way past the statute of limitations on blaming Fred. Prohm has coached here longer than Fred and longer than any coach since Orr.
 

Halincandenza

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2018
9,434
10,262
113
I actually don't think he has brought in much talent. He has had a lot of misses both in HS recruits and transfers. The problem is the talent he did bring in, left early.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron