This kid is getting so much hype on here lol. I do hope he develops into a fantastic QB for us!
I’m curious as to just what the college football definition of a “blue blood” might be. Because if it’s a perennial top ten team with a great coach, then we seem to be on our way to being one.Agreed. Five star kids think they have to go to a blueblood, usually.
That's a great discussion. Random off top of my head: Bama, LSU, Georgia, Clemson, Notre Dame, Ohio State, OU, Texas(?)I’m curious as to just what the college football definition of a “blue blood” might be. Because if it’s a perennial top ten team with a great coach, then we seem to be on our way to being one.
In which case, I’m okay with five star kids wanting to go to a blue blood.
I’d add the Florida schools, USC and Michigan when they are good.That's a great discussion. Random off top of my head: Bama, LSU, Georgia, Clemson, Notre Dame, Ohio State, OU, Texas(?)
I’m curious as to just what the college football definition of a “blue blood” might be. Because if it’s a perennial top ten team with a great coach, then we seem to be on our way to being one.
In which case, I’m okay with five star kids wanting to go to a blue blood.
To me blue bloods are the ones that are not only perennial top teams, but historically relevant and important in the sport.
So for CFB:
Alabama
Ohio State
Michigan
Notre Dame
Oklahoma
USC
If we're talking recruiting, the "new money" powers like Clemson, Oregon are certainly in the conversation.
I know Michigan and USC have been underwhelming recently, but they have too much history to ignore
Can also make an argument for schools like Florida, LSU, Penn State.
Texas is too streaky for me to put them on there.
20 years ago I might've put Nebraska on there, but they've been so mediocre for so long D) that they've faded fast.
Agree with this although,
kNebraska would kill to be mediocre now.
To me blue bloods are the ones that are not only perennial top teams, but historically relevant and important in the sport.
So for CFB:
Alabama
Ohio State
Michigan
Notre Dame
Oklahoma
USC
If we're talking recruiting, the "new money" powers like Clemson, Oregon are certainly in the conversation.
I know Michigan and USC have been underwhelming recently, but they have too much history to ignore
Can also make an argument for schools like Florida, LSU, Penn State.
Texas is too streaky for me to put them on there.
20 years ago I might've put Nebraska on there, but they've been so mediocre for so long ( ) that they've faded fast.
Michigan has history but they aren't in that top tier anymore. Clemson should be in ahead of them IMO. LSU ahead of USC unless you count Song Girls. Hottest pom squad in college IMO.
If we're talking moment in time, absolutely those two are ahead of UM and USC.
But when you factor in history, money, fanbase, etc. they're still up there in terms of prestige.
If I were a Michigan fan I'd be concerned about how much Ohio St has risen above them.
Purdy
Dekkers
Rocco
Yeah I think this staff knows what it's doing
We need to recruit a fullback named Moose.
10 star recruitsWhat were the rankings of the other qbs at this camp?
Nobody really good at all, just the 6th best qb in the ‘22 class committed to Clemson.What were the rankings of the other qbs at this camp?
"Rivals Underrated Three-Star Challenge" doesn't have the same ring to itSo they need to bump him up a couple stars or rename the camp?
I just can’t pump myself up for Dekkers for some reason. There’s not really any reason for me not to. And I couldn’t tell you why. I just don’t get excited for him like others on this board do. Hopefully that will change after Purdy is gone.Purdy
Dekkers
Rocco
Yeah I think this staff knows what it's doing
Let's just say the talk within the program about Dekkers should get you to change your mind on himI just can’t pump myself up for Dekkers for some reason. There’s not really any reason for me not to. And I couldn’t tell you why. I just don’t get excited for him like others on this board do. Hopefully that will change after Purdy is gone.