Unless they try the big ten. Are they AAU?All they can do is be pissed off about being pissed on. Or they can quit the sec and cut off their nose to spite their face. I dont think even tamu would actually do it tho.
Unless they try the big ten. Are they AAU?All they can do is be pissed off about being pissed on. Or they can quit the sec and cut off their nose to spite their face. I dont think even tamu would actually do it tho.
I believe in order to get basketball tickets you must also have football tickets. Then you just play some weird accounting games and voila.How the hell did ISU only make 10million more than KU last year in FB?
Texas A&M is a relatively recent addition to the AAU (2001).Unless they try the big ten. Are they AAU?
About the same as Captain KKKirk's record against ISU in his first 5 seasons.Oh, ok. So what is Matt Campbell’s record against a division he is supposed to “obliterate”?
Theres a thought. I wouldnt underestimate tamu desire to gtfo.Unless they try the big ten. Are they AAU?
So not on track to obliterate the division. Thank you, that’s all I was asking.About the same as Captain KKKirk's record against ISU in his first 5 seasons.
They aren't going anywhere. They can cry all they want but everyone down there will call their bluff. They aren't leaving that payday. It is funny listening to them whine.Theres a thought. I wouldnt underestimate tamu desire to gtfo.
Gods, its like a freaking soap opera w aggie and bevo. Or 8th grade love triangle. Ree-diculous.
Sources, supposedly in the know, have stated that UofI will NOT work to keep ISU out of the conference. So add Iowa to the YES vote column. (Consider the Board of Regents - they're not going to stand by and watch one of their two flagship universities go down the ****ter. So no way this happens.)A lot of EIU fans are saying that Iowa will never allow this happen, looking at the bylaws of the Big 10 it looks like they need 60% to pass something. Which means that they would have to be 6 NO votes to stop it from going through.
EIU would be one No vote according to their fan base, but would their be 5 others?
Ok then. Well, bye!So not on track to obliterate the division. Thank you, that’s all I was asking.
I doubt iowa would actually resist it if the others arent. Iowa's administrators would be pressured by local politicians to go along with it, and they also are generally going to act differently than fans (note how Barta was actually pretty good for us on the playoff committee last year)A lot of EIU fans are saying that Iowa will never allow this happen, looking at the bylaws of the Big 10 it looks like they need 60% to pass something. Which means that they would have to be 6 NO votes to stop it from going through.
EIU would be one No vote according to their fan base, but would their be 5 others?
Iowa will do what Ohio State and Michigan tells them to do.A lot of EIU fans are saying that Iowa will never allow this happen, looking at the bylaws of the Big 10 it looks like they need 60% to pass something. Which means that they would have to be 6 NO votes to stop it from going through.
EIU would be one No vote according to their fan base, but would their be 5 others?
Politicians, Board of Regents, People with actual intelligence on the matter and how it is a benefit in many ways and a huge negative for ISU to fall to a lower conference, all would be pressuring the UofI to admit us. This is good for them too, and the state in general, we share a lot of common interests, and Governance.I doubt iowa would actually resist it if the others arent. Iowa's administrators would be pressured by local politicians to go along with it, and they also are generally going to act differently than fans (note how Barta was actually pretty good for us on the playoff committee last year)
At OUR table. JFC you delusional loser. You could swap out ISU for Iowa and it would make zero difference in the Big 10. Nobody would care or notice, other than maybe the conference would have a lot fewer white guys.
It's Ohio State and Michigan's conference. Just like the Big 12 was UT and OUs conference. You're just along for the ride just like ISU was along for the ride with UT and OU. You don't matter, and ISU doesn't matter. Both programs are complete irrelevant afterthoughts in the grand scheme and national conversation of college sports. The difference is a good chunk of our fanbase realizes it while you dim bulbs think Iowa matters.
And let's not confuse wanting in the Big 10 as somehow a change of course. Wanting to get more money to play in what has been one of the 2 weakest power conference division per Sagarin consistently for a decade is pretty rational.
The big 10 west is ******* garbage. Everyone knows it. And I want in.
I think its funny when Hawks brag about how much revenue they have, or make, then every other day another story comes out how they are cutting programs, sports or budgets because they are in the red, cant afford them, or are losing money. Not to mention all the lawsuits for not paying their contractors continually.Talk about delusional….
Iowa is top 15-ish in terms of athletic revenue, and historically a top 25-30 program in both football and basketball. You can pretend that Iowa and Iowa State are equals all you want, but it isn’t even close to being true.
Talk about delusional….
Iowa is top 15-ish in terms of athletic revenue, and historically a top 25-30 program in both football and basketball. You can pretend that Iowa and Iowa State are equals all you want, but it isn’t even close to being true.
I mean the Big 10 west is bad and ISU is on the rise. Seems like one of the easiest routes through the remaining P5’s.Talk about delusional….
Iowa is top 15-ish in terms of athletic revenue, and historically a top 25-30 program in both football and basketball. You can pretend that Iowa and Iowa State are equals all you want, but it isn’t even close to being true.